Moisture content and water absorption capacity of bamboo are important parameters of bamboos which govern its durability/life span. Bamboos with high moisture content are susceptible to fungal and insect attacks. Both moisture content and water absorption percentages decreased from bottom to top along the culms in all the species. Similar observations were reported in other bamboo genera by different workers
(Razak et al., 2006; Kamruzzaman, et al., 2008; Bhonde et al., 2014; Zakikhani et al., 2014). Wakchaure and Kute, 2012 also found that the moisture content percentage and water absorption was not constant along the culm height. They further added that these parameters varied with age and height of bamboos. Among the species, the moisture content was observed maximum in culms of
B.
multiplex (66.88%) whereas
B.
vulgaris showed maximum water absorption (84.60%). Both moisture content and water absorption were observed minimum in
B.
nutans (42.67% and 56.36%). These differences are also dependent on the species, geographical location of the collected bamboo as well as the season of felling. There are variations in anatomical structures of bamboo species which may be the probable reason for maximum and minimum moisture content and water absorption in these species. The culm wall thickness decreased from bottom to top in all bamboo species. Larger vascular bundles with higher percentage of parenchyma are generally present at the bottom and middle positions of culms. This results in the highest moisture content and water absorption at these heights. Water absorption depends on the percentage of porosity and presence of intercellular spaces which is different for every bamboo species.
Specific gravity or basic density of bamboo determines the strength of bamboo. It varies with age, vertical culm height as well as horizontally across the culm wall/
B.
ventricosa (0.65) showed the maximum average specific gravity while the minimum average specific gravity was shown by
B.
vulgaris (0.52). Specific gravity increased from bottom towards the top in all species. The results are similar to the findings of
Falayi and Soyoye, 2014; Sharma et al., 2019 and
Selvan et al., 2017. The reason for the increase of the specific gravity at top height position is due to decrease in the culm wall thickness which results in compactness of highly thick walled sclerenchymatous fibrous tissue with less percentage of parenchyma
(Sharma et al., 2017). Santoshkumar and Bhat, 2014 reported that the increase in specific gravity/basic density along the culm height is indicative of higher proportion of fibrous tissues and higher frequency of vascular bundles at top position of bamboos. The relation of specific gravity with anatomical structure and chemical constituents influence the pattern in specific gravity in different bamboo species. The specific gravity also varies with variation in bamboo species
(Abd. Latif and Jusoh, 1992).
Loss of water molecules bound to cell wall of bamboos results in shrinkage which further determines its dimensional stability
(Aguinsatan et al., 2019). Bamboo, like wood is also an anisotropic material and its properties are different in longitudinal, radial and tangential directions. These variations in result may be due to difference in the size and proportion of xylem elements present at different height positions of these species. Longitudinal shrinkage was lesser than radial and tangential shrinkage in all
Bambusa species (Table 3). Similar observation was reported in
Phyllostachys bambusoides by
Sharma et al., (2019). Longitudinal shrinkage was minimum in all species and ranged from 0.78% (
B.
kingiana) to 2.81% (
B.
binghamii). Radial shrinkage was higher than tangential shrinkage because bamboo is a monocotyledon and rays are absent. There is no specific pattern of variation in longitudinal, radial and tangential shrinkage from bottom to top in culms of
Bambusa species.
B.
binghamii and
B.
tulda showed higher shrinkage towards the bottom and decreased gradually towards the top. Likewise, other workers reported higher shrinkage percentages at the bottom height position
(Kamruzzaman et al., 2008; Sompoh et al., 2013). This may be probably due to the presence and loss of higher initial moisture content at the base portion. While the top portions of
B.
balcooa,
B.
multiplex and
B.
ventricosa exhibited higher shrinkages (radial, longitudinal and tangential) than the middle and bottom. On the contrary,
B.
kingiana and
B.
vulgaris showed that their middle portion had maximum dimensional shrinkages. These variations in result may be due to difference in the size and proportion of xylem elements present at different height positions of these species. The variation in tangential shrinkage can be related to the bamboo’s anatomical structure and density
(Anwar et al., 2005). The dimensional stability in bamboo depends on its volumetric shrinkage and T/R ratio as in wood. Volumetric shrinkage is the sum of radial and tangential shrinkage. T/R is a good indicator of dimensional stability and measures the uniformity of shrinkage in bamboos
(Panshin and de Zeeuw, 1980). Bamboos with good stability have low volumetric shrinkage and low T/R ratio. On the basis of volumetric shrinkage,
Calderon (2012) classified bamboos into three categories namely low shrinkage (VS£11.5%), medium shrinkage (VS 11.5%-14.5%) and high shrinkage (VS³14.0%). According to this classification,
B.
balcooa,
B.
kingiana,
B.
nutans,
B.
ventricosa are low shrinkage bamboo,
B.
multiplex is medium shrinkage bamboo while
B.
binghamii,
B.
tulda and
B.
vulgaris are high shrinkage bamboos. The results given in Table 5 showed that T/R ratio in all
Bambusa species varied from 0.61 (
B.
balcooa) to 1.29 (
B.
nutans). Whereas in case of wood, T/R ratio varies from 1-3. The present study reveals that all
Bambusa species shrink uniformly and are dimensionally stable.
The results for analysis of variance (ANOVA) for all physical properties among eight
Bambusa species tabulated in Table 4 exhibited a significant variations at all height positions.