The respondents having area below 1.00 ha were categorized as marginal farm, which consists of 27 households. The respondent having area between 1.01 to 2.00 ha were categorized as small farm, consisting of 41 households. The respondent having area between 2.01 to 4.00 ha were categorized as semi-medium farm, which consists of 32 households. In the semi-medium farmer category, among the total of 32 households 8 respondents (25.00 per cent) were male and 24 respondents (75.00 per cent) were female. The involvement of women in rearing silkworm plays a pivotal role compared to that of male, which is relevant to the study conducted by Sharma et al., (2019)
in their paper.
Under marginal farmer, 5 respondents (22.73 per cent) fall into the lower age group of 30-38 years of age, 10 respondents (45.45 per cent) under the medium age group (39-59 years) and 7 respondents (31.82 per cent) fall under the higher age group (60 years and above). Under semi-medium 5 respondents (16.67 per cent) fall under the lower age group i
., 30-38 years, while 15 respondents (50.00 per cent) and 10 respondents (33.33 per cent) were under the medium age group of 39-59 years and higher age group of 60 and above years of age respectively. Similar finding were also reported in the line by Singh and Sharma (2020a)
The educational position of the sample respondents is presented below. It shows the literacy rate of the area under survey and also holds an important function in determining the knowledge and maintaining skills of the rearers of eri silkworm. Under semi-medium farmer, majority of the respondents were illiterate i
., 18 respondents (56.30 per cent), 12 respondents (37.50 per cent) fall under primary level, 1 respondent (3.13 per cent) having high school level of education and 1 respondent (3.13 per cent) having graduate level of education. Similar findings were found by Raju and Sannappa (2018)
in their paper majority of the farmers were illiterate.
The figure depicts that under marginal farmers, 5 respondents (23.80 per cent) were of small size family, 8 respondents (38.10 per cent) were of medium size family and 8 respondents (38.10 per cent) fall under the large family size. Small farmers, 8 respondents (15.40 per cent) fall under small family size, 34 respondents (65.40 per cent) were under medium size family and 10 respondents (19.20 per cent) on large family size. Under small farmer, 52 cows (13.70 per cent), 26 pigs (6.80 per cent), 44 ducks (11.60 per cent) and 255 poultry (67.60 per cent) were reared. Under semi-medium farmer, 49 cows (9.40 per cent), 26 pigs (4.90 per cent), 112 ducks (21.40 per cent) and 337 poultry (64.30 per cent) were reared by the sampled farmers Dewangan (2017)
where respondents were engaged in rearing different livestock.
This holds an important part in the survey in order to determine the primary and secondary source of income of the sample population. From the figure, it can be seen that under marginal farmer, the primary occupation of 17 respondents (63.00 per cent) was agriculture. 9 respondents (33.33 per cent) took sericulture as their primary occupation followed by service 3.70 per cent (1 respondent). Similar reports were found by Dewangan et al., (2011)
in their paper which disclosed that more than half of the total respondents adopted sericulture as secondary occupation. Marketing channel is the alternative ways of transferring goods from producer to consumer. The marketing channel of eri cocoon follows only one channel.
Table 1 reveals the marketing channel involves only a single channel of transferring silk cocoon to consumer through the department of sericulture.
Table 1: Marketing channel of eri.
The total production of each farm category as per 100 dfls was obtained as 80.50 kgs on marginal farmers, 85.50 kgs on small farmers and 90.05 kgs on semi-medium farmers. Marketing cost was computed by estimating the cost acquired in the process of marketing of cocoon. The cost incurred after harvesting till it reached the consumers generally constituted the marketing cost. Similar finding were also by Singh and Sharma (2020a)
Table 2 reveal the total cost incurred for marketing 1 kg of cocoon.
Table 2: Marketing cost, margin and price spread of eri through channel - I (₹/kg).
For marginal farmers, the marketing cost for 1 kg of cocoon was ₹ 5.00, for small farmers, the cost incurred was ₹ 4.50 per kg and for semi-medium farmers, the total cost incurred by the farmer for 1 kg of cocoon was ₹ 4.00, respectively. Similar finding were also by Singh and Sharma, (2020b)
. The price spread as per kg of cocoon was obtained to be ₹ 5.00 on marginal farmer, ₹ 4.50 on small farmer and ₹ 4.00 on semi-medium farmer.
Table 3 reveals the detailed about the cost incurred as well as return perceived from cocoon production per 100 dfls.
Table 3: Breakup cost of cultivation of eri across various farm categories (₹/100 dfls).
The total cost for production of silk cocoon was accounted to be ₹ 7,950 on marginal, ₹ 8,240 on small and ₹ 8,530 on semi-medium farmers, respectively. The break-up of total cost into fixed cost and variable costs indicated that the fixed cost were ₹ 1,500 (18.90 per cent) on marginal, ₹ 1,670 (20.30 per cent) on small and ₹ 1,840 (21.60 per cent) on semi-medium farms, while the variable costs were ₹ 6,450 (81.10 per cent) on marginal, ₹ 6,570 (79.70 per cent) on small and ₹ 6,690 (78.40 per cent) on semi-medium farms, respectively. Among the total cost, the imputed value of human labor bore the highest which amounted to ₹ 4,500; ₹ 4,500 and ₹ 4,500 on marginal, small and semi-medium farms, contributing 69.80 per cent, 68.50 per cent and 67.30 per cent, respectively.
Table 4 reveals that the second major cost factor was cost of castor leaf which accounted ₹ 1,200, ₹ 1,250 and ₹ 1,290 on marginal, small and semi-medium farmers with 18.60 per cent, 19.10 per cent and 19.30 per cent, respectively; which is then followed by marketing cost accounted ₹ 300 (4.70 per cent) on marginal, ₹ 320 (4.90 per cent) on small and ₹ 350 (5.20 per cent) on semi-medium farmers. The cost of disease free laying (dfls) amounted to ₹ 200 (3.10 per cent), ₹ 200 (3.00 per cent) and ₹ 200 (3.00 per cent) on marginal small and semi-medium farmers, respectively.
Table 4: Farm profit Measures on Sample farms (₹/100 dfls).
The cost incurred on disinfectants accounted to ₹ 150 (2.30 per cent) on marginal, ₹ 180 (2.70 per cent) on small and ₹ 200 (3.00 per cent) on semi-medium farmers, respectively. Other cost components contributed to less than 5 per cent to the overall cost similar study by Singh and Sharma (2012)
Among the fixed cost, the highest cost is borne by rental value on own land accounting ₹ 700 (46.70 per cent) on marginal farms, ₹ 750 (44.90 per cent) on small farms and ₹ 800 (43.50 per cent) on semi-medium farms, which is followed by depreciation on building and equipment cost which accounted to ₹ 450 (30.0 per cent) on marginal farmer, ₹ 550 (32.90 per cent) on small farmer and ₹ 650 (35.30 per cent) on semi-medium farmers. The cost of interest value on fixed capital was ₹ 350 (23.30 per cent) on marginal farms, ₹ 370 (22.20 per cent) on small farms and ₹ 390 (21.20 per cent) on semi-medium farmers. From the above discussion, it indicates that higher costs were incurred on large farmers which were followed by small farmers and the least was incurred on marginal farmers. The above study is pertinent to the research conducted by Roopa (2014)
Table 5 reveals with regards to the constraints faced during production and marketing, lack of knowledge among the growers about training and rearing of cocoon were ranked as I followed by non-availability of market in the locality; as a result the farmers had to supply their final products to the state department directly without the involvement of middlemen.
Table 5: Constraints in production and marketing of eri silkworm.
The next constraint which caused problematic to the respondents were lack of organization, so the farmers themselves are involved directly with the people of the department of sericulture leading to the absence of market information which is the next constraint, followed by inadequate transport facility. The next constraint is non-availability of capital facility in the initial stage from any financial institution. Similar studies by Singh and Sharma (2020b)
. Thus, the last constraint faced in production and marketing of eri silkworm was low marketable surplus, as the entire yield obtained from 100 dfls was directly sold to the traders. Hadimani et al. (2019)
had mentioned similar results.