Vegetation analysis
A total of 31 species belonging to 15 families were reported (Table 1). The family
Asteraceae was dominant, with 12 species. This was followed by
Urticaceae, with 3 species. While
Polygonaceae, Lamiaceae and
Commenlinaceae had 2 species each, respectively.
Ageratina riparia (24.1) possessed the highest density, followed by
Ageratina adenophora (11.34),
Ageratum conyzoides (8.90) and
Pneumatopteris penningera (8.82), respectively. The lowest density was recorded in
Phaseolus vulgaris (0.22). The distribution analysis of the herb species also displayed that the maximum IVI was recorded for
Ageratina riparia (38.45). The co-dominating species were
Ageratina adenophora (IVI=22.44),
Ageratum conyzoides (IVI =22.35) and
Pneumatopteris pennigera (IVI=21.44), respectively. High IVI value of a species indicates its dominance and ecological success, power of regeneration and greater ecological amplitude. A higher value of IVI by any individual species indicates that all the available resources are being utilized by that species
(Shameem et al., 2010). The lowest IVI value was observed in
Phaseolus vulgaris (1.74). The lower value of IVI could be due to the damage caused by the high moisture content at the site, which leads to infestations of fungi within the roots. The lower IVI values may also be correlated with anthropogenic pressure (
Mandal and Joshi, 2014). Moreover, vegetation types along the environmental gradient are largely affected by altitude, light, topography, temperature and precipitation, as these factors determine the composition and distribution of the vegetation (
Saolam, 2013). Meanwhile, the lower importance value of species is an index of low grazing pressure by herbivores on the study sites, as vegetation is a reflex of interactions between the plants, animals, soils and climate. Moreover, each species of a community plays a specific role and there is a definite quantitative relationship between abundant and rare species
(Bhandari et al., 1999). Bhatti et al. (2014) in Yusmarg forest also report that the higher value of IVI indicates that all the available resources are being utilized by that species and leftovers are being trapped by other species as the competitors and associates.
Diversity indices
The various diversity indices recorded at the sampling station (Table 2) are as follows: Species diversity (Shannon-Wiener Index) = 2.775, Species richness (Margalef’s Index) = 4.163, Species evenness (Pielou’s Evenness) = 0.808 and Species dominance (Simpson’s Index) = 0.101. The higher values of Shannon-wiener’s diversity Index may indicate the high diversity of species present on the site. It also observed that the low diversity and consequently greater concentration of dominance in vegetation could be due to the lower rate of evolution and diversification of communities in the environment (
Connel and Orias, 1964). More species in a community are ecologically important since diversity increases as the community become more stable.
Ethnobotanical uses
The use of ethnomedicinal plants for various ailments has been recorded extensively
(El-Seedi et al., 2013). From the herbaceous species recorded, 11 herb species were utilized by the indigenous inhabitants (Table 3). Traditional knowledge of medicinal plants is critical as they enable for development of novel drugs (
Fabricant and Farnsworth, 2001). Similar studies on the ethnobotany of riparian vegetation by
Mohanan et al., (2020) report the presence of about 106 medicinal plants belonging to 48 families in the study. One of the biggest threats to such medicinal plants is both over harvesting and destruction of habitats (
Cunningham, 1992). The distribution of medicinal plants in the riparian zone is greatly affected by anthropogenic activities. As urbanization rapidly spreads and modern medicines are implemented, the indigenous tribal knowledge which has not yet been documented is being lost. Therefore conservation strategies of the knowledge and sustainable utilization of the plant species are vital. This can be achieved by selecting the endangered important ethnomedicinal plants and understanding their management by the indigenous inhabitants
(Woldeab et al., 2018).