Agrobacterium-mediated transformation is effected by many physical and chemical factors. In the current study both physical and chemical parameters were evaluated by using
gus as a reporter gene. The transient expression of
gus gene can be easily measured from the transformed explants (
Dundar 2008). Gene delivary by
Agrobacterium tumefaciens EHA-105 can be improved by evaluating both physical and chemical factors which was resulted in producing a suitable method of gene transfer to several plants such as tobacco
(Kutty et al., 2010) and groundnut (
Ashutosh Vadawale et al. 2012).
Bacterial growth phase and infection period
The results obtained after transformation using
Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA 105 at various bacterial concentrations ranged from A600nm 0.17-1.34 and infection periods analysed at 15, 30 and 60 min were shown in Table 1. Of four different bacterial densities, the highest numbers of GUS-positive spots were found at A600nm 0.17, 30 min (mean value1.17±0.09 ). The transformation frequency was decreased with increased bacterial density and infection period.
The percentage of GUS positive explants from bacterial density at A600nm0.17 to 0.88 cultures were increased (48.33%) and decreased at A600nm 1.34 cultures. Transformation frequency decreases as necrotic damage increases from lower bacterial density (A600nm 0.17, ) to higher density (A600nm 1.34). This indicates that explants viability has direct effect on transformation efficiency. Among the three infection periods used, only explants incubated bacterial density at A600nm0.17 for 30 min gave transformants without necrotic damage (Table 1).
Higher bacterial densities of
Agrobacterium were used to transform recalcitrant plants such as rice, Sweet potato (
Gonzalez et al. 2008) and pepper (
Ismail et al. 2006). Low bacterial density was also used to transform plants such as in Brocolli (
Metz et al.1995) and tobacco
(Kutty et al., 2010). But in our study early log phase was found to be the best for transforming
Oxalis corniculata L. Bacterial density at A600nm 0.17 growth phase was found to be most effective in producing high transformation efficiency without necrotic damage. In order to minimise the necrotic damage of explants, culture was diluted to 1:10 before infection of explants. The high transformation efficiency was found at A600nm 0.56, 0.8 and their mean differences were statistically significant. Necrotic damage at A600nm0.17, 30 min was least hence bacterial density at A600nm 0.17 and infection period 30 min minutes was chosen in this study.
Co-cultivation temperature
The effect of temperature during Co-culture on T-DNA delivery was first reported in dicotyledonary plants (
Opabode 2006). The effects of different co-cultivation temperatures on transient GUS expression were studied and the result were shown in Table 2. The explants were co-cultivated at three different temperatures like 22, 25 and 28
oC and the highest GUS positive spots were found at 22
oC with the mean value (33.33 ±2.02 ) and less number of GUS positive spots at 25 and 28
oC (13.33±1.33 ), (12.00±1.0) respectively. This indicates that co-cultivation temperature has direct effect on
Agrobacterium mediated transformation. The mean differences of GUS positive spots at 25 and 28
oC were statistically insignificant.
The percentage of GUS positive explants were found to be approximately 26.66% at temperature 22 and 13.33% at 25 and 28°C After analysing with trinocular microscope, highest number 33.33 (±2.02) spots were found per explant at 22 and lowest number found at 25 and 28°C 13.33 (± 1.33), 12.00 (±1.0) respectively.
Present study involves three different Co-cultivation temperatures. There were several reports on higher transformation efficiency where explants Co-cultivated at 22°C and obtained high number of GUS-positive spots (
Dillen et al. 1997) (
Kutty et al. 2010). Efficient DNA delivery into plant cells at 22°C was also reported in Sweet potato (
Gonzalez et al. 2008) and cauliflower (
Chakrabarty et al. 2002). It was reported in the earlier studies that size of crown gall tumour decreased when Co-cultivation temperature was increased (
Braun 1947).
Based on the results obtained, Co-cultivation temperature either at 22°C was found to be equally effective to get more number of GUS-positive spots as well as more number of GUS-positive explants. Hence we have chosen 22°C as co-cultivation temperature and it was introduced in further experiments. Cocultivation temperature at 25 and 28°C resulted in low transformation efficiency. Hence we have chosen 22 instead of 25 or 28°C. It is also supported by the reports that low temperatures are favourable for efficient T-DNA transfer
(Salas et al., 2001) compare to high temperatures.
Acetosyringone in Cocultivation Medium
The effect of Acetosyringone (AS) on
Agrobacterium mediated transformation was studied using six different concentrations of AS from 50-800 μM. These different concentrations were added seperately to the Cocultivation medium and results were shown in Table 3. Of six different concentrations of AS 400 μM concentration gave highest number of GUS positive spots with the mean value (171.00±1.15). The numbers of GUS positive spots were gradually increased at AS concentration from 50-200μM and decreased from 600-800 μM. The mean differences of the number of blue spots from 50-800 μM were statistically significant (Table 3). The control is without blue sopts (Fig 3A) and the percentages of GUS-positive explants were highest 64.44 at AS concentration 400 μM (Fig 3B). One of the GUS positive explants was shown with magnification (Fig 3C).The number of GUS-positive spots were counted using Trinocular microscope and one of such explant with microscopic view was shown (Fig 3D). It was well documented by
Ismail et al. (2006) that the optimal concentration of AS for higher transient GUS expression differs based on genotype and cultivars of plant. It reveals that
Agrobacterium cells may have been induced to maximum towards virulent stages at 400 μM concentration of AS. The higher concentration was also reported in other plants
(Li et al., 2007 and
Kumar et al., 2010). There was no increase in the number of GUS positive explants after adding AS into the bacterial inoculum (data was not shown).
Therefore it is recommended to consider the cultivar and its responses and sensitivity of AS to achieve high transformation efficiency. This is due to no induction of rapid cellular dedifferentiation. We have not observed the expansion of leaf explants even after incubating on MS medium for two days. Pre-culturing of explants results in rapid cellular dedifferentiation and new cells which are having weakened pathogen recognition ability
(Sangwan et al., 1992).
This reveals that new cells are not formed from the leaf explants (data not shown) as a result susceptibility of
Agrobacterium is highly reduced. Pre-cultured explants prior to infection increases transient GUS expression and it was reported in many plants like Sour Cherry (
Song and Sink 2005), tobacco (
Sunil Kumar et al. 1999) ginger
Suma et al. (2008).
GUS Histo chemical analysis
The method of
Jefferson (1987) was used for a GUS histochemical assay. The GUS positive explants were observed with naked eye and each blue spot was counted using stereomicroscope (Fig 3D). The explants co-cultivated at 22oC and 400µM AS resulted GUS-positive explants were 10 per 15 explants (Fig 3B). The Control (Fig 3A) and a magnified GUS positive explant were shown (Fig 3C) . A close-up image of microscopic view of GUS-positive explants with blue spots were shown (Fig 3D).