Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Assessing the Nutrient Status of Soil and Water Bodies in Palayapatti Areas, Thanjavur District of Tamil Nadu (India)

S. Selvaraj1,*
1RVS Agricultural College, Thanjavur-613 402, Tamil Nadu. India.
Background: Thanjavur is a cauvery delta zone for paddy growing area of Tamil Nadu. The current study aiming with understanding about chemical properties and nutrient status of soils of selected area and assessing quality of water bodies.  

Methods: The study was conducted during 2018-19 at Palayappatti and its surrounding villages in Thanjavur district of Tamil Nadu to find out the nutrient status of soil and water. Fifty representative soil samples and ten water samples collected with the objectives of analyzing chemical properties of soil and assessing water quality in Palayapatti and its surrounding villages of Thanjavur district.

Result: The collected soil and water samples varied with different chemical and physical properties. Soils were slightly acidic to slightly alkaline, normal EC and low organic carbon, low to medium content of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, low to medium content of calcium, magnesium and sulphur. Water samples were slightly acidic to moderately alkaline pH, medium to high salt content, moderate amount of carbonate and bicarbonate content. The soil and water bodies of this land having medium range of nutrients and also improvement is need in water quality. 
Soil is the vital natural resource for the survival of life on the earth and its assessment is the prerequisite for the determination of productivity of soil and the sustainability of the ecosystem. The biggest challenge to the mankind today, is to provide the basic necessities for living, from the ever shrinking and non-renewable soil resource (Lal, 2013). Soils are considered as an integral part of the landscape and thus characteristics are largely governed by the landforms on which they have developed (Sharma et al., 2014). Precise scientific information on characteristics, potentials, limitations and management of different soils are indispensible for planned development of soil resources to maintain their productivity and to meet the demands for the future. 

The quality of ground water plays a key role in judging its suitability for crop production. Declining soil fertility and mismanagement of plant nutrients have made this task more difficult (Yaser and Rahim, 2013). Irrigation has been found to be beneficial in increasing productivity of land, provided all the conditions for irrigation suitability of particular land is optimum but if any one of the parameters is limiting, then irrigation may not be so sustainable. (Mandal et al., 2009). Water resources in Thanjavur district, Tamil Nadu are currently under serious pressure. The ground water usage in the district is in the range of 18 to 160%. The study is having objectives as to estimate the chemical properties and nutrient status of soils and to assessing quality of water bodies in selected areas.
Ten villages are selected and soil and water samples collected in these villages by taking into consideration of geology, climatic conditions, geomorphic characters and other related pedological information pertaining to the study area. The study area of Palayapatti in Budalur taluk co-ordinated with 10o78’ N and 78o98’E. 

Surface (0-15 cm) soil samples were collected and processed for analysis. pH and EC were measured in 1: 2.5 soil water ratio (w/v) suspension using pH meter and EC meter respectively. Soil organic carbon (OC) content was estimated by Walkley and Black (1934) method.

The available nitrogen was estimated by the alkaline potassium permanganate method as described by Subbiah and Asija (1956). The available phosphorus content of soil was extracted by using Olsen’s extractant as described by Olsen et al., (1954). The available potassium in the soils was extracted by employing neutral normal ammonium acetate and determined by aspirating the extract into the flame photometer, Systronics flame photometer 128 (Jackson, 1973). The exchangeable calcium and magnesium were determined by Versenate method. The concentration of exchangeable cations Ca2+ and Mg2+ were expressed in mg kg-1 soil (Chopra and Kanwar, 1991). Available sulphur was determined by spectrophotometrically as described by (Chesnin and Yien, 1951)

The water samples were collected in capped high density PVC bottles, fortified with one mL toluene to arrest any biological activity. The samples were analyzed for EC, pH, CO3-2, HCO3-, TSS, Cl-, Ca2+, Mg2+, K and Na+ by following the procedures outlined in USDA Handbook No. 60 (Piper, 2002). Water samples were also categorized on the basis of criteria adopted by All India Coordinated Research Project (ACRIP) on Management of Salt Affected Soils and Use of Saline Water in Agriculture through the values of EC, SAR and RSC of the samples (Gupta et al., 1994). 
The present study in ten villages of soil and water samples collected in Palayapatti and surrounding villages in Thanjavur district. In soil samples important chemical properties and water quality parameters assessed reported in Table 1 and Table 2.

Table 1: Chemical properties in soil.



Table 2: Water quality parameters.


  
Chemical properties
 
Soils of villages studied were slightly acidic to slightly alkaline. The pH values ranged from 6.18 (South Palayapatti) to 7.50 (Sithambarapatti village). Soil pH values of the studied profiles irrespective of soil depth varied from 4.4 to 7.1 showing strongly acidic to neutral reaction of the soils studied (Upadhayaya et al., 2013).

The electrical conductivity of soil varied from 0.51 to 0.85 dSm-1. The EC of the soil water suspension showed lowest value in Thakannur village and highest valued in  Karupupatti village. Sachin et al (2021) explained about the electrical conductivity of the soils ranged from 0.10 to 1.10 dSm-1 Chikkamagalur district of Karnataka. The organic carbon content in different villages ranged from 0.10 to 0.27%. The highest value observed in Thakkanur village and lowest value observed in Aachampatti village. The same type result obtained by Arivoli et al., (2021) said that SOC value ranged between 0.09 to 1.5% in Ranipet district of Tamil Nadu.  

Primary and secondary nutrient analysis
 
The soil available nitrogen ranged from 40.3 kg ha-1 in Chidambarapatti to 49.8 kg ha-1 in Thakannur village. Samal et al., (2010) reported that the content of available nitrogen 272 kg/ha, P2O5 (28.75 to 51.75 kg/ha) and K2O content (135 to 335 kg/ha).

The available phosphorus in soil varied from 2.48 to 5.51 kg ha-1. The highest available phosphorus observed in Kathadipatti village and lowest value of phosphorus in South Palayapatti village. The same type report observed by Trivedi et al., (2010) that the overall P content in the soils of western plain of Rajasthan varied from 173.61-313.94 mg kg-1 with mean value 223.88 mg kg-1.

The available potassium in farm soil ranged between 43.5 and 68.3 kg ha-1. The lowest value observed in Solagampatti soil and highest value observed in Kathadipatti soil. Dhanorkar et al., (2013) explained that the soils with low potassium were distributed in Sadashivpet, Zaheerabad, Sangareddy, Narayankher, Dubbak, Siddipet, Narsapur, Ramayampet divisions and of medium potassium were found in Gajwel, Medak, Siddipet, Narayankher, Ramayampet, Dubbak.

The available calcium varied in the range between 17.4 mg kg-1 and 32.1 mg kg-1. The highest calcium content in Chidambarapatti and lowest value observed in Sellapanpatti village field soil. The same type of result observed in Chandan river system of Banka and Bhagalpur district of south Bihar that the soils of lower and medium were rich in bases (Ca2+ and Mg2+) whereas soils of upper pedons were comparatively poor in bases Panday and Kumar (2014).

The available magnesium content exhibited in the farm blocks ranged in different aspect. The lowest value observed in Aachampatti soil as 8.1 mg kg-1. And highest value observed as 12.8 mg kg-1 in Karupupatti.  These soils have wider exchangeable Ca to Mg ratio indicating the dominance of calcium bearing minerals (Baruah et al., 2011).

The available sulphur ranged between 11.3 mg kg-1 and 19.5 mg kg-1. The highest value observed in Sellappanpatti and lowest value gathered in Karupupatti village. The available sulphur in Vertisols, Inceptisols and Entisols were ranged from 1.50 to 51.25, 1.25 to 57.75 and 1.75 to 49.00 mg kg-1 with a mean value 9.96, 11.00 and 10.34 mg kg-1, respectively. Among Entisols recorded 14 per cent samples in medium category and remaining 86 per cent in low category (Cheke et al., 2015).
   
Water quality parameters
 
The pH value varied in water sample between 6.5 and 8.0. The lowest pH value observed in water sample of Sellappanpatti villlage and highest value observed in Solagampatti village. According to Kaledhonkar et al., (2012) reported that the average pH (1:2) was 8.0 (7.2-9.0) during rabi of 2004-05 while it was observed as 8.26 (7.74-8.72) during 2006-07 in sub-surface drainage in Haryana. 

The EC value was in the range between 0.7 and 1.5 dSm-1. The highest EC observed in Aachampatti water sample and lowest EC depicted in Karupupatti water samples. In Kanina block, electrical conductivity (EC) ranged from 0.35 to 9.29 dS m-1 with a mean of 2.37 dS m-1. Shahid et al., (2008) also reported similar results in Julana block of Jind district.

The carbonates values varied between 12.90 meq/l and 29.24 meq/l. The highest value observed in Karuppupatti water sample and Solagampatti water having lowest carbonate content. The salt composition showed dominance of CO32- (1.5 to 3.0 me L-1) and HCO3- (2.5 to 13.2 me L-1) also present (Mandal, 2012). The bicarbonate content depicted as lowest value (17.32 meq/l) and highest value (43.21 meq/l). The lowest value observed in Avarampatti field and highest value observed in Aachampatti water samples. The similar result observed that in anions dominance of bicarbonate ranges from 0.40 to 24.22 m.e. L-1 bicarbonate followed by 0.05 to 12.04 m.e.L-1 chloride (Singh and Dubey, 2014).

The calcium content varied between 5.1 meq/l and 19.4 meq/l. The highest value observed in Kathadipatti field water and lowest value observed in Aavarampatti field water. The same observed by Arora et al., 2012 that Irrigation with NTW resulted in significant decrease in divalent cations (Ca2++ and Mg2+) content specifically for saline soil; all level of Ca2++ Mg2+ content was unaffected for normal and alkali soil when compared with initial soil. The magnesium content ranged from 16.2 meq/l to 42.50 meq/l. The highest value observed in Chidabarapatti field water and lowest value observed in Karupupatti field water.

The chloride content varied between 2.3 meq/l and 8.9 meq/l. The highest value observed in Sellappanpatti field water and lowest value observed in Aachampatti field water. Arora et al., 2012 explained that these quality waters were synthesized freshly every time using bicarbonate, chloride and sulphate of calcium, magnesium and sodium in the syntax water tanks in Karnal. 

The sodium content ranged from 23.4 meq/l in Aachampatti field and 54.5 in North Palayapatti field water. Dominating cations in these waters of this PS area were sodium which ranged from 0.16 to 59.69 m.e. L-1 followed by calcium from 0.20 to 16.22 m.e. L-1 (Singh and Dubey 2012).  

The potassium content ranged between 12.9 meq/l and 27.2 meq/l. The highest potassium content observed in Thakannur field water and lowest potassium content observed in Kathadipatti field water.  In case of cations, sodium was the dominant ion which ranged from 2.90 to 60.20 me L-1 followed by magnesium (0.45 to 19.50 me L-1), calcium (0.15 to 6.10 me L-1) and potassium (0.10 to 2.10 me L-1) in Haryana by Ramprakash et al., 2013.
 
Water quality
 
The sodium hazard value observed more in 16.97 (tamarind field water) and lowest value (8.21) observed in North Palayapatti field water. The similar results showed by  Shahid et al., 2008 that the lowest SAR value was observed in village Bamanwas and the highest value was observed in village Desh Khera, Haryana.  The magnitude of Na+ in soil is quantified by the exchangeable sodium percentage or by its estimator, the sodium adsorption ratio SAR (Muneer et al., 2012). 

The RSC value ranged between 1.22 meq/l and 5.65 meq/l. The highest RSC content observed in Karupupatti field water and lowest in Aachampatti field water.  High RSC water is characterized by low total salts concentration. The relative proportion of calcium and magnesium is much smaller as compared to sodium. Such waters have carbonates and bicarbonates predominant anions (Sharma et al., 2014).
Soils were slightly acidic to slightly alkaline, normal EC and low organic carbon, low to medium content of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, low to medium content of calcium, magnesium and sulphur. Water samples were slightly acidic to moderately alkaline pH, medium to high salt content, moderate amount of carbonate and bicarbonate content, Low to Medium content of TSS, normal to problematic Ca and Mg, Normal Na and K, Low to medium of SAR and good to fair RSC. Good quality and marginally saline waters can be successfully used for crop production without any hazardous effect on soil and plants. But in contingency, these waters can be used with special management practices depending upon the rainfall, crop to be grown and soil type.
None

  1. Arivoli, S., Vassou, M., Tennyson, S., Meeran, M., Ramanan, A., Divya, S., Kamatchi, P. (2021). Analysis of soil and water quality in selected villages of Ranpet district of Tamil Nadu. Current World Environment. 16 (2): 477-491.    

  2. Arora, N.K., Chaudhari, S.K., Farooq, J.A. and Basak, N. (2012). Effect of poor quality water on the chemical properties of the salt affected soils and performance of rice. Journal of Soil Salinity and Water Quality. 4(2): 114-121.   

  3. Baruah, B.K., Das, B., Haque, A., Medhi, C. and Misra, A.K. (2011). Sequential extraction of common metals (Na, K, Ca and Mg) from surface soil. Chemistry on Pharmacy Research 3(5): 565-573.

  4. Cheke, R., Sehnu, B.M., J.M. Jibrin and A.M. Samndi. (2015). Fertility Status of Selected Soils in the Sudan Savanna Biome of Northern Nigeria. Internal Journal of Soil Science 10 (2): 74-83. 

  5. Chesnin, L. and Yien, C.H. (1951) Turbidimetric Determination of Available Sulphur. Proceedings of Soil Science Society of America. 15: 149-151. 

  6. Chopra, S.L. and Kanwar, J.S. (1991). Analytical Agricultural Chemistry. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi pp: 279.  

  7. Dhanorkar, B.A. Arti Koyal, Mohekar, D.S, Naidu L.G.K. Reddy, R.S. and Dipak Sarkar. (2013). Soil resources assessment for crop planning in Medak district andhra Pradesh. Agropedology. 23(1): 23-29. 

  8. Gupta, G.P, Tembhare, B.B. and Mishra, S.R. (1994). Characterisation and classification of soils of granitic terrain in Jabalpur district of Madhya Pradesh. Agropedology. 9: 77-81.

  9. Kaledhonkar, K.M. Oyem, H.H., Oyem, I.M. and Ezeweali, D. (2012). Temperature, pH, Electrical conductivity, Total Dissolved Solids and Chemical Oxygen Demand of Groundwater in Boji-Boji Agbor area and immediate suburbs. Research Journal of Environmental Science 8(8): 444-450.   

  10. Lal, R. (2013). Soil and Sanskriti. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science. 61: 267-274. 

  11. Mandal, A.K., Sharma, R.C. and Singh, G. (2009). Assessment of salt affected soils in India using GIS. Geocarto International. 24: 437-456. 

  12. Mandal, A.K. (2012). Delineation and characterization of salt affected and waterlogged areas in the Indo-gangetic Plain of Central Haryana (District Kurukshetra) for reclamation and management. Journal of the Soil Salinity and Water Quality. 4(1): 21-25.    

  13. Muneer, Al-Falahi, N.A., Basak, N., Chaudhari, S.K. and Sharma, D.K. (2012). Effect of saline and alkali water irrigation on physical and chemical properties of Sodic clay loam soil. Journal of the Soil Salinity and Water Quality. 4(1): 26-33.  

  14. Olsen, S.R, Cole, C.V, Watanbe, F.S and Dean, L.A (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction of sodium bicarbonate. United States Department of Agriculture pp: 939. 

  15. Pandey, A.K. and Kumar, V. (2014). Soil Morphological, Physical and chemical characteristics of chandan river system. Agropedology. 24(1): 29-40.   

  16. Piper, C.S., (2002).  Soil and Plant Analysis. Surabhi Publications., New Delhi.

  17. Ramprakash, Sanjay Kumar, Rajpaul, Sharma, S.K. and Satyavan. (2013). Mapping of groudwater quality of beri block of Jhajjar district in Haryana. Journal of Soil Salinity and Water Quality. 5 (1): 27-33.

  18. Samal, P.K, Dhyaani, P.P. and Dollo M. (2010). Indigenous medicinal practices of Bhotia tribal community in Indian Central Himalaya. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge. 9(1): 140-144.

  19. Sachin, H.E., Singh, Y.V., Bindu, K.R., Pavan D. Sai and Meena, R.N. (2021). Groundwater quality assessment of different villages of chikkamagalur block in chikkamagalur district of Karnataka. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science. 69 (2): 142-146.

  20. Shahid, M., Singh, A.P., Bhandari, D.K. and Ahmad, I. (2008). Groundwater quality appraisal and categorization in Julana block of Jind district, Haryana. Journal of the Indian Society of  Soil Science 56 (1): 123-125.  

  21. Sharma, N., Sawant, C., Adarsh kumar, Indra mani and Singh., J.K. (1999). Soil bin studies on the selection of furrow opener for conservation agriculture. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 15 (2): 107-120. 

  22. Sharma, K.L., Grace, G.K., Chandrika, S.K., Vittal, K.P.R, Singh, S.P., Nema, A.K. and Usha Rani, K. (2014). Effects of soil management practices on key soil quality indicators and indices in pearl millet [Pennisetum americanum (L.) Leeke]-Based system in hot semiarid inceptisols. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 45: 785-809. 

  23. Singh, Y.P and Dubey, S.K (2014). Quality of underground irrigation water and their effects on soil properties of Tonk district of Rajasthan. J. Soil Sal.Water Qual. 4(2): 68-71. 

  24. Subbiah, B.V. and Asija, G.E. (1956). A rapid procedure for the determination of available nitrogen in soils. Current Science. 25(8): 259-260.  

  25. Trivedi, S.K., Tomar, R.A.S., Tomar P.S. and Gupta Naresh. (2010). Vertical distribution of different forms of phosphorus in alluvial soils of gird region of Madhya pradesh. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science. 58: 86-90.  

  26. Upadhayaya, V.K, Gupta, R.D. and Sanjay Arora. (2013). Land capability classification in relation to soil properties repsenting bio-sequences in foothills of North India. Journal of Soil and Water Cons. 12 (1). 3-9.   

  27. Walkley and Black C.A, (1934). An examination of Degitijaroff method for determining soil organic matter and proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37: 29-34.  

  28. Yaser, J and Rahim. (2013). Variations in some soil physical properties, micronutrient distribution and its stock under high density guava orchard ecosystem. Journal Soil and Water Conservation 15 (2): 107-120. 

Editorial Board

View all (0)