Effect on weed dry weight
Stale seedbed (SSB) resulted in the lowest weed dry weight of 4.57 and 7.81 g m
-2 at 30 and 60 DAS, respectively (Table 1). The percentage reduction in total weed dry weight due to the adoption of SSB compared to normal seed bed was 64. 98 and 40.15 per cent, respectively at 30 and 60 DAS. Lower weed dry weight observed in SSB might be due to the depletion of weed seed bank in the surface soil owing to the removal of germinated weeds prior to sowing of okra seeds. Depletion of weed seeds in the seedling zone reduced the weed pressure in crop.
Ranjit (2007) also stated that adoption of SSB caused significant reduction in weed count (18.8-34.1%) and dry weight (21.3%) as compared to normal seedbed.
Among the weed management, the lowest weed dry weight was observed in wheel hoe weeding at 15, 30 and 45 DAS (W
4) at 30 DAS and it was on par with W
1 and W
2 (Table 1). At 60 DAS also, the lowest weed dry weight was recorded in W
4 (2.54 gm
-2), which was significantly superior to all other treatments. The treatment W
4 was followed by W
2 and it was statistically on par with W
3 and W
5. At 30 and 60 DAS, weedy check resulted in the highest weed dry weight (23.67 and 33.23 g m
-2, respectively). Wheel hoe weeding at 15, 30 and 45 DAS (W
4) very effectively eliminated the weeds and created a condition congenial for the crops to grow vigorously and smother the weeds and resulted in the lowest weed biomass.
Mynavathi et al., (2008) observed that wheel hoe weeding was effective in lowering the weed density and weed dry weight in maize. Mulching with dried banana leaf mulch alone (W
1) or
fb wheel hoe weeding at 30 and 45 DAS (W
2) also registered lower weed dry weight. This was due to the beneficial effect of dried banana leaf mulch in hindering the weed emergence and the favourable environment provided for the crop to grow and smother the weeds due to the beneficial effects of dried banana leaf as mulch in moisture conservation, regulation of soil temperature and addition of organic matter to the soil. Beneficial effect of dried banana leaf mulch in reducing the weed biomass was reported by
Sinchana (2020).
Interaction between seedbed preparation and weed management had considerable impact on weed dry weight. The treatment combination, S
1W
4 resulted in the lowest weed dry weight at 30 and 60 DAS. This was due to the favourable influence of mulch and wheel hoe weeding in reducing the weed density and biomass. The highest weed dry weight was observed in S
2W
6 at 30 and 60 DAS.
Nutrient uptake by weeds
Stale seedbed recorded significantly lower total N, P and K uptake by weeds (Table 1). Adoption of SSB caused a reduction in N, P and K uptake by weeds to a tune of 63.45, 49.01 and 61.04 per cent respectively at 30 DAS and to a tune of 41.52, 43.17 and 22.98 per cent, respectively at 60 DAS. Significant reduction in the nutrient removal by weeds in SSB at 30 and 60 DAS was due to lower weed biomass recorded in the treatment.
Gaurav et al., (2018) opined that, weeds usually grow faster than the associated crop plants and draw available nutrients in higher amounts leading to the deficiency of nutrients in crop plants. Competition for nutrients was found to be more when the root system of crop and weeds overlap in the soil profile for exploring nutrients.
Wheel hoe weeding at 15, 30 and 45 DAS (W
4) registered the lowest P and K uptake and N uptake in dried banana leaf mulching @ 10 t ha
-1 at 30 DAS (Table 1). However, at 60 DAS, the lowest N and P uptake by weeds was noted in wheel hoe weeding (W
4) and K uptake in W
2 (dried banana leaf mulching
fb wheel hoe weeding at 30 and 45 DAS). This was due to lower dry matter accumulation in weeds and respective nutrient content. Parameswari and Srinivas (2014) reported that nutrient depletion by weeds was found to be lower in cono weeding treatment. Weedy check registered higher amount of nutrient removal by weeds owing to higher weed biomass registered in the treatment. Similar results were also reported by Mahadevaiah and Karunasagar (2014) in baby corn and Sinchana (2020) in bush type vegetable cowpea.
Interaction was found to significant at both 30 and 60 DAS (Table 2). The treatment combination in S
1W
1 resulted in the lowest N uptake by weeds and P and K uptake by weeds were recorded the lowest in S
1W
4. At 60 DAS, the treatment combination S
1W
4 resulted in the lowest nutrient uptake/removal by weeds. The result is in conformity with the observations of Sinchana (2020) and
Sannagoudar et al., (2012b).
Nutrient availability
Stale seedbed recorded higher values of N, P and K content in soil than normal seedbed (Table 3). This was due to reduction in the depletion of nutrients by weeds (Table 1).
Similar observations were also reported by
Tehria et al., (2015) and
Sinchana (2020).
Higher nutrient status was recorded in weed control treatments compared to weedy check (Table 3) might be due to the better control of weeds that resulted in reduction in nutrient removal by weeds. The result is in line with the observations of
Kumar et al., (2019) who reported that two manual hoeing registered significantly higher available P and K content in soil.
Gaurav et al., (2018) also reported that weed management treatments recorded higher nutrient availability in soil compared to weedy check. Interaction between seedbed preparation and weed management was not significant for soil available N and P. However, interaction was significant for soil available K. The highest soil available K was recorded in the treatment S
1W
6 and it was statistically on par with S
1W
4, S
1W
2 and S
2W
6.
Nutrient uptake by crop
Adoption of SSB enhanced the total N, P and K uptake by 27.76, 19.56 and 17.11 per cent, respectively over normal seedbed. Nutrient uptake by crop is directly related to nutrient content and dry matter production. Higher uptake of nutrients registered in SSB was due to higher DMP and higher N, P and K content recorded in the treatment. Higher nutrient uptake by crop was also associated with lower total weed density and weed dry weight and higher weed control efficiency
(Sannagoudar et al., 2012b).
Wheel hoe weeding at 15, 30 and 45 DAS (W
4) recorded the highest total uptake of P and K and dried banana leaf mulch
fb mechanical weeding with wheel hoe weeding at 30 and 45 DAS recorded the highest total N uptake. Increase in the uptake of nutrients observed in W
4 was due to increase in the availability of nutrients due to significant reduction in nutrient removal by weeds (Table 1). The result is in line with the observations of
Sharma and Singh (2011) who reported that mechanical weeding twice at 15 and 30 DAS significantly enhanced the uptake of nutrients in grain and straw of wheat due to effective control of weeds and higher DMP. Weedy check recorded the lowest uptake of N, P and K by crop. This might be due to severe crop weed competition as evident from data on dry weight that restricted the crop to draw nutrients from the soil. Reduced availability of nutrients (Table 3) and higher nutrient removal by weeds (Table 1) also attributed to lower nutrient uptake by crop in weedy check
(Sannagoudar et al., 2021b).
Effect on yield
Stale seedbed resulted in the highest fruit yield ha
-1 (3291 kg ha
-1) compared to normal seed bed (2963 kg ha
-1). Higher yield registered in SSB was due to the absence of early crop weed competition. It was also noted that SSB accounted for higher nutrient uptake (Table 5) in okra. Increased nutrient availability and uptake (Table 3 and 4) significantly improved the yield attributes particularly number of fruits per plant (Table 5) which finally contributed to higher yield in okra.
Among the weed management practices, the highest fruit yield ha-1 was recorded in W
4 (4412 kg ha
-1) and it was significantly superior to other treatments. The treatment W
4 was followed by W
2, W
3 and W
5. The treatment W5 was statistically on par with W
1. The lowest fruit yield ha
-1 was recorded in W
6 (1852 kg ha
-1). No interaction was observed between seedbed preparation and weed management practices. Higher yield recorded in W
4 might be due to the fact that wheel hoe weeding effectively uprooted and buried the weeds into the soil resulted in significant reduction in weed biomass (Table 1). Furthermore, it improves soil aeration, root development, availability and uptake of nutrients, (Table 3 and 4) which favours crop growth, photosynthesis and assimilate partitioning from source to sink leading to the production of greater number of fruits per plant with higher fruit yield (Table 5).
Akbar et al., (2011) observed that mechanical hoeing significantly increased the grain yield (25.1%) in rice over control due to enhancement in nutrient availability resulting from soil stirring and weed control. Interaction did not have any significant effect.