Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 42 issue 5 (october 2022) : 562-567

​Effect of Moisture Regimes, FYM and Levels of Phosphorus Carriers on Growth, Yield Attributes and Yield by Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)

Kashyap N. Patel2,*, F.B. Patel3, B.R. Patel3, V.R. Patel1
1Department of Agricultural chemistry and Soil Science, C.P. College of Agriculture, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar-385 506, Gujarat, India.
2Centre for Research on Integrated Farming System, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar- 385 506, Gujarat, India.
3Centre for Natural Recourses Management, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar-385 506, Gujarat, India.
Cite article:- Patel N. Kashyap, Patel F.B., Patel B.R., Patel V.R. (2022). ​Effect of Moisture Regimes, FYM and Levels of Phosphorus Carriers on Growth, Yield Attributes and Yield by Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) . Agricultural Science Digest. 42(5): 562-567. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5528.
Background: Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) ranks fourth in terms of worldwide production. The states of Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Bihar and Gujarat accounted for more than 80 per cent share in total production; India ranks second, next to China in global production of potato. Potato crop is extremely sensitive to the deficit or surplus moisture and requires an optimum amount of irrigation at frequent intervals for its proper growth. Phosphorus (P) is an element that is potatoes require in large amounts following Nitrogen and Potassium, P application rates influence on the P efficiency for tuber yield and P uptake.

Methods: In field study, total 36 treatment combinations consisting of three moisture regimes as main plot treatment and 12 combinations of two levels of FYM, three levels of P, carriers as sub-plot treatments evaluated in split plot design with three replications using potato variety Kufri pukhraj as test crop. 

Result: Among different moisture regimes tested, the treatment receiving maintenance of moisture between 100 and 75 per cent availability at 0-30 cm soil depth (W1) gave significantly higher plant height (52.24 cm), number of tubers per plant (6.74), total tuber yield (335.74 q/ha) and haulm yield (16.64 q/ha) during pooled results. Combinations of FYM and levels of P carriers tested, the treatment combinations FYM and application of P @ 180 kg P2O5/ha in the form of MAP(P3S1M1) showed significantly higher plant height (50.04 cm), tuber per plant (6.87), total tuber yield (323.98 q/ha) and haulm yield (17.16 q/ha) gave during pooled results.
After maize, wheat and rice, potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) ranks fourth in terms of worldwide production (Bruinsma 2017). The worldwide potato production was appraised at 388,191,000 Mg/ha in 2017 (FAOSTAT, 2019). The globe potato segment is undergoing major changes. Until the early 1990s, most potatoes were grown and consumed in Europe, North America and countries of the former Soviet Union. Since then, there has been a dramatic increase in potato production and demand in Asia, Africa and Latin America, where output rose from less than 30 million tonnes in the early 1960s to more than 165 million tonnes in 2007 (Source: https://www.potatopro.com/world/potato-statistics). Potato has now become one of the most popular crops in India and cultivated in almost all states and under very diverse agro-climate conditions. The states of Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Bihar and Gujarat accounted for more than 80 per cent share in total production; India ranks second, next to China in global production of potato (Source: https://www.potatopro.com/india/potato-statistics). India produces more than 43.77 million tonnes of potatoes from an area of 2.13 million hectares with an average yield of 20515 kg/ha (Anonymous, 2016).
       
Potato crop is extremely sensitive to the deficit or surplus moisture and requires an optimum amount of irrigation at frequent intervals for its proper growth (Kashyap and Panda 2003). In water-scarce areas, frequent irrigation to the crops is difficult due to the stressed water resources and increased demand for other purposes. This necessitates an improvement in the water use efficiency to fulfil the water requirement of the crops (Poddar et al., 2018). Several investigators used the water balance approach to study the crop water requirements, soil moisture dynamics, crop coefficients and irrigation schedules for potato crop (Stalham and Allen 2004).
       
Phosphorus (P) is an element that is potatoes require in large amounts following nitrogen and potassium, P application rates influence on the P efficiency for tuber yield and P uptake (Jasim et al., 2020). P also plays a fundamental role in crop and vegetable physiology. Energy storage and transfer are the most important functions of P in plants (Bruulsema et al., 2019). The P deficiency suppresses and delays potato growth and maturity (Hopkins and Hansen 2019). The plants that are grown under P stress are generally stunted, with darker green-collared leaves. When the P deficiency is exacerbated, the dark green colour changes to greyish-green or bluish-green (Chalker-Scott 1999). Moreover, incorporation of FYM not only provides almost all nutrients but also helps in providing balanced nutrition to the crop which is reflected in terms of better growth and development and subsequently higher yield (Ibeawuchi et al., 2007). These sources reduce the mining of soil nutrient and improve soil organic carbon, humus and overall soil productivity (Jenssen 1993). It was reported that FYM increased the tuber yield by 43-45.3% (Ilin 1992) by a long residual effect, supporting better growth and development (Abou et al., 2005). It serves as a slow release of nutrients to the crop (Upadhayay et al., 2003).
The experiment was laid out on Plot No. B-10 at Agronomy Instructional Farm, Department of Agronomy, Chimanbhai Patel College of Agriculture, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University (SDAU), Sardarkrushinagar during rabi seasons of the year 2017-18 and 2018-19. Geographically, the SDAU, Sardarkrushinagar situated in the North Gujarat Agro-climatic region (Zone IV). The climate of this region is sub-tropical monsoon type and falls under semi-arid region. In general, monsoons are warm and moderately humid and summer season (March-June) is generally hot and dry. The winter season sets in the middle of October and continues till middle of February the minimum temperature of the both season is observed either in the month of December or January. The overall climatological data indicated that the weather conditions were observed normal and favourable for the satisfactory growth and development of the potato crop during the rabi, 2017-18 and 2018-19.
       
The experimental field has even topography with gentle slope and good drainage. The soil samples were drawn randomly from different places of experimental site up to a depth of 0 to 15 cm before the sowing of crop (Table 1). The soil was low in organic carbon and available nitrogen, medium in available P2O5, K2O and DTPA-extractable Fe and Zn and having sufficient DTPA-extractable Mn and Cu status. The Kufri Pukhraj potato was selected for this investigation because of its heat resistant, early producing and high yielding.
 

Table 1: Initial properties of the experimental plot before sowing of potato crop at 0-15 cm soil depth.


 
Experimental and cultural operations details of field study
 
A. Main plot treatment: 03
 
W1= Maintenance of moisture between 100 and 75% availability at 0-30 cm soil depth.
W2= Maintenance of moisture between 100 and 50% availability at 0-30 cm soil depth.
W3= Maintenance of moisture between 100 and 25% availability at 0-30 cm soil depth.
 
B. Sub-plot treatments: 12
 
1. Levels of P: 03
 
P1= 100 kg P2O5/ha.
P2= 140 kg P2O5/ha.
P3= 180 kg P2O5/ha.
 
2. Sources of P: 02
 
S1= Monoammonium phosphate (MAP).
S2= Diammonium phosphate (DAP).
 
3. FYM: 02
 
M0= 0 t/ha.
M1= 20 t/ha.
 
       
The present experiment was laid out in Split Plot Design (SPD) with three replications, 36 treatment combination and 108 total numbers of experimental plots at 6 × 4.5 m (9 line) gross and 5.2 × 3.5 m (7 line) net plot size as per plan of layout. Potato tubers of variety Kufri Pukhraj were cut in pieces, keeping two to three live eye buds with approximately 30 to 35 g weight. Cut pieces were treated with the mixture of Mancozeb @ 1 kg/ha + Talc powder @ 5 kg/ha before planting to control rotting of cut pieces of potato tubers. The treated cut pieces of potato tubers were planted 20 cm apart in opened furrows with seed rate @ 3000 kg tubers/ha on 18th November and on 20th November during 2017 and 2018, respectively.
       
Two common irrigations were applied i.e. first irrigation was given immediately after planting and second irrigation was on 5th day after first irrigation for facilitating easy germination of the crop. After that according to treatments (moisture regimes), the irrigations were given when the moisture content in the soil was reached to 7.66, 6.60 and 5.54 per cent, which represent the availability of soil moisture at 75, 50 and 25 per cent, respectively. Periodically, the soil samples for moisture were taken up to a depth of 0-30 cm for determining the needs of irrigation. The statistical analysis of the data generated during the course of investigation was carried out through software on computer following the procedure described by Cochran and Cox (1967).
The statistics given in Fig 1 (A) showed that the plant height measured at harvest was significantly influenced due to different treatments it’s diverse from 41.18 to 52.24 cm. Maintenance of moisture between 100 and 75% availability at 0-30 cm soil depth gave significantly higher plant height (50.13, 54.35 and 52.24 cm). Whereas, combination P3S1M1 showed significantly higher plant height as compared to other treatment combinations except P1S2M0, P1S2M1, P2S2M1, P3S2M1 which was at par with P3S1M1, during both of the years and pooled results, respectively. Potato is the water lowing plant therefore under or over supply of irrigation water may affect growth, yield and quality of the crop. Both the productivity and quality of produce largely depend on a proper balance between soil air and soil moisture available in the plant root zone throughout the crop growth period, which can only be achieved by adopting a sound water management practices (Singh et al., 2012). Potato crop is very sensitive to insufficient fertilizer doses and very responsive to higher doses of fertilizers. A perusal of data [Fig 1 (B)] revealed that the maintenance of moisture W1 level recorded significantly more number of tubers per plant over rest of treatments. Among the levels of P carriers with and without application of FYM, combination P3S1M1 showed significantly higher number of tuber per plant (6.40, 7.34, and 6.87) as compared to other treatment combinations.
 

Fig 1: Effect of moisture regimes and combinations of FYM and levels of P carriers on plant height.


       
Maintenance of moisture between 100 and 25% availability at 0-30 cm soil depth (W3) produced significantly more small size tuber (< 25 g) yield (14.45, 15.69 and 15.07 q/ha during 2017-18, 2018-19 and in pooled results, respectively) as compared to W1 and W3 moisture regimes [Fig 1(C)]. An adequate water supply is required from tuber initiation till the maturity for higher yield and good tuber quality. Moisture stress, especially at the most critical stages like stolen formation, tuber formation and tuber development, results sharp decline in potato productivity (Saikia, 2011). The data [Fig 1 (C), (D) and (E)] on small size tuber yield of potato after harvest as affected by treatment combination P3S1M1 (180 kg P2O5/ha + MAP + FYM @ 20 t/ha) was recorded significantly highest small (13.24, 15.25 and 14.24 q/ha), medium (34.28, 35.66 and 34.97 q/ha) and large (273.37, 276.15 and 274.76 q/ha) size tuber yield during 2017-18, 2018-19 and pooled result, respectively.
       
Among different treatments tested, maintenance of moisture W1 produced significantly higher total tuber yield of potato as compared to other moisture regimes. An increase in total tuber yield of potato due at W1 moisture regimes was to the tune of 23.37% over W3 moisture regime (Table 2). As far as the effect of different combinations of FYM and levels of P carriers on potato tuber yield was concerned, it was observed that yield of tuber with FYM and application of P @ 180 kg P2O5/ha in the form of MAP (P3S1M1) was significantly higher (320.90, 327.06 and 323.98 q/ha during 2017-18, 2018-19 and pooled result, respectively) over all the treatment combinations except P2S2M1 (310.57 q/ha) and P3S2M1 (317.82 q/ha).
 

Table 2: Effect of moisture regimes and combinations of FYM and levels of P carriers on total tuber yield of potato.


       
Among the regimes of moisture, moisture level W1 and W2 were significantly yielded more hau effect of different combinations of FYM and levels of P carriers on potato haulm yield was concerned [Fig 1 (F)], it was observed that yield of haulm with FYM and application of P @ 180 kg P2O5/ha in the form of MAP (P3S1M1) was significantly higher (16.23, 18.09 and 17.16 q/ha during 2017-18, 2018-19 and pooled basis, respectively) as compare to allover treatment combinations. The similar results were also observed by Singh and Agarwal (2005) with the application of FYM @ 10 and 20 t/ha and observed an increase in grain and straw yield of wheat, Response of FYM majored as kg grain was highest in wheat (Mahapatra et al., 2007). Shahi et al., (2015) also observed the role of P levels and FYM on wheat crop. Application of P levels significantly augmented crop growth and yield of wheat. This might be due to moisture availability for a longer period to the crop along with positive effect of moisture and FYM on P availability in soil. Shahi et al., (2015) and Patel et al., (2020) also revealed in their studies that an application of P at a higher level in the form of MAP showed higher and significant response.
In the loamy sand (Typic ustipsamments) of North Gujarat, maintenance of moisture between 100 and 75 per cent availability at 0-30 cm depth and an application of FYM @ 20 t/ha along with 180 kg P2O5/ha through MAP was found more advantageous in terms of growth, yield attributes and yield.
None.

  1. Abou, M.M., Hoda, M.A. and Fawzy, Z.F. (2005). Relationships, growth, yield of broccoli with increasing N, P and K ratio in a mixture of NPK fertilizers. Annal of Agricultural Sciences. 43(2): 791-805.

  2. Anonymous (2016). Agricultural Statistics at a Glance. Area,  production and yield of horticultural and plantation crops, Government of India.

  3. Bruinsma, J. (2017). World Agriculture: Towards 2015/2030. An FAO Study. Routledge, Abingdon.

  4. Bruulsema, T.W., Peterson, H.M. and Prochnow, L.I. (2019). The science of 4R nutrient stewardship for phosphorus management across latitudes. Journal of Environmental Quality. 48: 1295-1299.

  5. Chalker-Scott, L. (1999). Environmental significance of anthocyanins in plant stress responses. Photochemistry and Photobiology. 70: 1-9.

  6. Cochran, W. G. and Cox, G. M. (1967). Experimental Designs, John Willey and Sons. Inc. New York: 546-568.

  7. FAOSTAT. FAO, R. Food and Agriculture Organization (2019). Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data (accessed on, 7 October 2020).

  8. Hopkins, B.G. and Hansen, N.C. (2019). Phosphorus Management in High-Yield Systems. Journal of Environmental Quality. 48: 1265-1280.

  9. Ibeawuchi, L.L., Opara, F.A., Tom, C.T. and Obiefuna, J.C. (2007). Graded replacement of inorganic fertilizer with organic manure for sustainable maize production in Owerri Imo State. Nigerian Journal of Life Sciences. 4(2): 82-87.

  10. Ilin, Z., Durvra, M., Markovic, V. and Branka, S. (1992). Yield and quality of young potato effected by irrigation and farm manure. Savremena Poljop Rivreda, 40(1–2): 211-215.

  11. Jackson, M.L. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.

  12. Jasim, A., Sharma, L.K., Zaeen, A., Bali, S.K., Buzza, A. and Alyokhin, A. (2020). Potato Phosphorus Response in Soils with High Value of Phosphorus. Agriculture, 10: 264.

  13. Jenssen, B.H. (1993). Integrated Nutrient Management. The Use of Organic and Mineral Fertilizer. In: [Van Reuler H, Prins WH (eds)] The Role of Plant Nutrients for Sustainable Food Crop Production in Sub-Saharan Africa. Leidschendam, Netherlands.pp. 89-105.

  14. Kashyap, P.S. and Panda, R.K. (2003). Effect of irrigation scheduling on potato crop parameters under water stressed conditions. Agricultural Water Management. 59(1): 49-66.

  15. Mahapatra, P., Singh, R.P., Singh, B.P. and Sarkar, A.K. (2007). Long term effects of fertilizer, organic manure and amendments on soil health, crop productivity and sustainability. SSAC (BAU) Technical Bulletin, 4: 1-75.

  16. Patel, K. N., Patel, D. A., Patel, V. K., Patel, F. B., Patel, V. R. and Pavaya, R. P. (2020). Effect of Moisture Regimes, FYM and Levels of P Carriers on Phosphorus Fractions Status of Loamy Sand in Laboratory Condition. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 9(8): 571-588. 

  17. Poddar, A., Kumar, N. and Shankar, V. (2018). Evaluation of two irrigation scheduling methodologies for potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in north-western mid-hills of India. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 1-10.

  18. Saikia, M. (2011). Effect of irrigation and mulching on growth, yield and water-use efficiency of potato in Assam. Potato Journal. 38(1): 81-83.

  19. Shahi, S.H., Kushwaha, I.K. and Sharma, P.K. (2015). Effect of phosphorus levels, Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria (PSB) and Farmyard Manure (FYM) on physico-chemical properties of soil and performance of wheat crop (Triticum aestivum L.). Indian Journal of Agriculture and Allied Sciences. 1(1): 38-44.

  20. Singh, N., Sood, M.C., Trehan, S.P., Lal, S.S. and Singh, S.P. (2012). Influence of irrigation and mulch on growth, yield and economics of potato. Annals of Horticulture. 5(1): 41-46.

  21. Singh, R. and Agrawal, S.K. (2005). Effect of levels of farm yard manure and nitrogen fertilizer on grain yield and use efficiency of nutrients on wheat (Triticum aestivum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Science. 75(7): 408-413.

  22. Stalham, M.A. and Allen, E.J. (2004). Water uptake in the potato (Solanum tuberosum) crop. Journal of Agricultural Science. 142(4): 373-393.

  23. Upadhayay, N.C., Singh, N., Rawal, S. and Kumar, P. (2003). Response of two potato cultivars to vermicompost and inorganic fertilizers. Journal of the Indian Potato Association. 30: 85-86.

  24. Piper, C.S. (1966). Soil and Plant Analysis. Hans Publishers, Bombay.

  25. Subbaish, B.V. and Asija, G.L. (1956). A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Current Science. 25: 259-260.

  26. Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Watanade, F.S. and Dean, L.A. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. U. S. Department of Agriculture. Circular, 939.

  27. Lindsay, W. L. and Norvell, W. A. (1978).Development of a DTPA micronutrient soil for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Science Society and American Journal. 42: 421-442.

Editorial Board

View all (0)