Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

​Effect of Planting Methods, Plastic Mulches, Training Systems, Soil Temperature and Soil Moisture on Tomato Yield

Shilpa1,*, Priyanka Bijalwan2, Y.R. Shukla3
1Department of Vegetable Science, Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan-173 230, Himachal Pradesh, India.
2Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, Kangra-176 001, Himachal Pradesh, India.
3Defence Research and Development Organisation, Pithoragarh-262 501, Uttarakhand, India.
Background: Tomato is an important vegetable crop of Himachal Pradesh grown during summer and rainy seasons. Although the produce of the tomato fetches lucrative rates in the plains of Northern India, yet, the production is threatened by plethora of factors viz., diseases, insect-pests and weeds which ultimately affects yield and quality of fruits. The planting methods, mulches and training systems played enormous role in maintaining the soil temperature and moisture.

Methods: The present investigation was carried out to study the performance of tomato (var. Solan Lalima) crop under open field conditions with two different planting methods, three types of mulch treatments and two types of training systems. This experiment was conducted at Vegetable Research Farm of DR YSP, UHF, Nauni, Solan during the period from March to September, 2017-18 and similarly for the period from March to September, 2018-19.

Result: The maximum soil temperature was recorded under blackmulch followed by silver/black polythene mulch and control during the standard meteorological week (March to September, 2017-18 and 2019). Soil moisture was found to be maximum those treatments where silver or black mulch was used as compared to black mulch plot under the open field conditions. The maximum fruit yield (140.71 kg/plot) was obtained under the raised bed planting system, black mulch and two stem training system and the corresponding value being 136.16 kg/plot for raised bed planting method, silver/black mulch and two stem training system.
Improving soil moisture conservation is an ongoing goal in agricultural production system, especially in India, where the water resources are scanty and regulated. One reason that there is a push to use less water in agriculture is because of increasing demand generated by the increasing population in India. To feed that much population it becomes necessary to use less water resources and more emphasis should be given to save those natural resources. The water demands of urban populations are essentially fixed and increase, so water availability for agricultural producers is constantly reduced. To address and therefore to encompass both of these issues, farmers are searching for new ways or the techniques to improve rather than soil moisture but overall hydrothermal properties of the soil. Mulching is one cultural practice which can be used to addresses or overcome this problem. Covering the ground with mulch saves water by preventing surface evaporation and therefore maintains the soil temperature. Using certain agricultural byproducts as mulch is a sustainable practice which can reduce water use and provide other benefits as well (Ghosh et al., 2006). Tomato is one of the most important commercial vegetable crops grown in India and throughout the world. The requirement of irrigation waterto tomato crop is moderately high in Indo-Gangetic plains. It is generally about 550-600 mm, while the crop evapo-transpiration demand is about 250-270 mm. The scarcity of the water resources and competition for water in many sectors also reducesthe availability of water for agricultural usage. Considering the water scarcity for more intense in future, the planning and management of this resource for its optimal, economic and judicious use has become very important aspect for making the agriculture a sustainable approach.
       
The advantages of the raised bed-planting system includes water savings (up to 30% along with the furrow irrigation) combined with enhanced water use efûciency, improvement in soil physiochemicalstatus and better nitrogen use efûciency, greater and better utilization of sunlight, less crop-weed competition and increment in yield (Zhang et al., 2007 and Kumar et al., 2015). Polythene mulches or synthetic mulches are widely used in so many horticultural crops to promote the growth of main plants and also suppress the weed growth and to reduce their population, to conserve the soil moisture and to alter temperature in the rhizosphere. One of the main benefits associated with plastic mulching is the modification of the microclimate around the plant. Synthetic mulches (plastic of different colors) are widely used invegetable production due to their highefficacy to maintain the soil hydrothermal regime by altering the water distribution between soil evaporation and plant transpiration, and thus modifying the soil temperature and moisture parameters (Bahadur et al., 2013). Plastic mulches increased the soil temperature generally by about 6-7°C at a depth of 5 cm and by 4°C at 10 cm depth. The present investigation aimed to study the effect of various planting systems used for vegetable production and mulch materials on hydrothermal regime of soil and plant training system on yield in tomato.
 
An experiment was conducted for the consecutive two years during Kharif season (2017-2018 and 2018-2019) at two different sites of the Research Farm of Vegetable Science. This experiment was laid out under factorial randomized block design with three replications comprising of twelve treatment combinations of planting methods viz. raised bed and flat bed, mulch materials viz., black polythene mulch and silver/black mulch and training systems viz., two stem training system and three stem training system. The experimental field was ploughed thoroughly with the help of a tractor followed by planking well in advance before transplanting. Tomato variety ‘Solan Lalima’ was grown during the present study. It’s fruit having medium sized, round shaped deep red in colour with TSS 4-5 0Brix. It is a self pollinated indeterminate variety developed by selection. Healthy seedlings were transplanted on 12th April, 2017 andApril, 2018 at a spacing of 90 cm x 30 cm. Black polyethylene mulch and silver/black mulch of 50μ (200 gauge thickness) were applied according to the treatment combinations. Black mulch and grey or black mulch used in the experiment were procured from the open market. The observations were recorded on the parameters regarding the yield per plot (kg), soil moisture content (%) and soil temperature (oC).The data pertaining to the present investigation were statistical analyzed using the standard procedures of the factorial randomized block design (RBD).
 
Soil temperature (°C)
 
Soil temperature was measured throughout the plant growth period using mercuryin-glass soil thermometers in each plot of each treatment and also replication wise. Soil thermometers were installed at 5 cm depth in eachplot within the rows of tomato plants.Soil temperature at 5 cm depth by soil thermometer was recorded daily outside the open field conditions (an open environment) at local standard time and then averaged. The soil temperature was observed at weekly interval from May-August at 7:30 hours and 14:30 hours (local standard time) at 0-5 cm soil depth during the year 2017-2018 and 2018-2019. The observed data enumerated that the mulches played enormous role in maintaining the soil temperature. The data indicated that application of black mulch in raised bed planting method (P1M1T1) along with two stem training system increased the soil temperature by 3.46°C, 4.07°C, 4.06°C and 1.97°C during (Fig 3,4,5 and 6) the 4th week of May, June, July and August, 2017-18 and 3.12°C, 1.73°C, 2.77°C and 2.08°C, during the 4th week of May, June, July and August, 2017-18 respectively over no mulch application in flat beds along with three stem training system (P2M3T2) as recorded during the morning and afternoon hours. The soil temperature was also increased by 3.22°C, 5.78°C, 3.44°C and 6.11°C during the 4th week of May, June, July and August, 2018-19 and 3.10°C, 2.95°C, 1.91°C and 2.52°C during the 4th week of May, June, July and August, 2018-19 with the application of black polythene mulch placed on raised beds (P1M1T1) along with three stem training system, respectively, during morning and afternoon hours over no mulch application in flat beds along with three stem training system (P2M3T2). The same trend was observed during all the weeks of different months during both the years of experimentation. In general, the effect of mulching on the temperature regime of the soil varied depending on capacity of the mulch materials to reflect and transmit solar energy (Lamont, 2005). Black mulch materials have specific optical properties due to which mulches control soil temperature, which can augment or reduce crop yield (Kader et al., 2017). According to Kumar and Lal (2012), Kosterna et al. (2014) and Angmo et al. (2018) in tomato mulching reduces soil temperature in summer and raises it in winter.

Fig 3: Mean weekly soil temperature (o C at 07:30 hrs) at 0-5 cm soil depth under different treatments during 2017-2018.



Fig 4: Mean weekly soil temperature (o C at 14:30 hrs) at 0-5 cm soil depth under different treatments during 2017-2018.



Fig 5: Mean weekly soil temperature (o C at 07:30 hrs) at 0-5 cm soil depth under different treatments during 2018-2019.



Fig 6: Mean weekly soil temperature (o C at 14:30 hrs) at 0-5 cm soil depth under different treatments during 2018-2019.


 
Soil moisture (%)
 
The data pertaining to soil moisture content under different treatment combinations, recorded during the growth and development of tomato for both the cropping periods 2017-18 and 2018-19 at 0-15 cm soil depth at fortnightly interval. Both the mulches(black mulch and silver/black mulch) were found effective in conserving the soil moisturecontent. Maximum soil moisture conservation was observed under silver/black mulch followed by black polyethylene mulch placed on flat beds. The per cent increase in soil moisture content during the cropping period of 2017-18 during the fortnight interval of May, June, July and August was calculated as 20.10, 20.15, 21.26, 25.40, 19.90, 21.15, 26.78 and 29.86 per cent, respectively in the treatment combination P2M2T1 as compared to the P1M3T2(Fig 1 and 2). Similarly, during the year 2018-19, the per cent increase in soil moisture content during the fortnight interval of May, June, July and August was 44.52, 38.99, 17.32, 24.13, 21.16, 16.08, 30.00 and 21.98 per cent, respectively in the treatment combination P2M2Tas compared to the P1M3T2. The soil moisture content was higher during the months of July and Augustdue to heavy rains. The higher moisture content in the flat beds was due to less drainage compared to the raised beds. Kumar et al., (2010) also reported low soil moisture under raised bed than flat bed planting method. They attributed that this might be due to the rapid drying of raised bed in comparison to flat bed which resulted into higher soil moisture content in flat beds. The higher moisture recorded in soil mulched with silver polythene sheet could be attributed to its ability to reflect high amount of sunlight, thereby reducing evapo-transpiration and enhancing moisture retention in the soil. As the moisture depletion was least under silver/grey mulch, the moisture recharging-ability was also least because water infiltration was prevented. None of the less, capillary movement of water molecules through the soil pores from the water table has strongly supplied water to the root zone of the crop grown under silver/grey plastic mulch in the present study. Similar results were represented byAwodoyin et al. (2007) in tomato, Diaz-Perez (2010) in bell pepper and Ashrafuzzaman et al. (2011) in chilli.

Fig 1: Soil moisture (%) at 0-15 cm soil depth under different treatments during cropping period of 2017-2018.



Fig 2: Soil moisture (%) at 0-15 cm soil depth under different treatments during cropping period year 2018-2019.


 
Fruit yield per plot (kg)
 
The data pertaining to the effect of different treatments on fruit yield per plot (Table 1) which revealed significant effects for all the interactions. The plants which were grown on raised bed (P1) planting method produced maximum yield (127.57 kg/plot) and this treatment was significantly superior over flat bed planting method (P2) producing 116.61 kg/plot (pooled data). Similar trend was observed during the years 2017-18 and 2018-19. The influence of different types of mulches on yield per plot was also significant (pooled data as well as during both the years). An examination of the pooled data revealed significant differences of different mulches and maximum value (129.42 kg/plot) was recorded in the plants grown on black mulch (M1) followed by those (126.64 kg/plot) grown on silver/black mulch (M2), while minimum (110.20 kg/plot) yield per plot was recorded in the plots where no mulch (M3) was applied. Regarding the effect of training systems, maximum (125.12 kg/plot) yield was recorded in those plants which were trained to two stem (T1) and minimum yield (119.06 kg/plot) was recorded from the plants trained to three stem (T2). Similar results were followed during both the years of study. The influence of two way interactions on yield per plot was significant in P × M (planting methods and mulching treatments) interaction (pooled data). Maximum value was recorded in the plants grown on raised bed with black mulch (136.45 kg/plot). This treatment combination was significantly superior over P1M2 (raised bed with silver/black mulch) producing 133.20 kg/plot yield, P2M1 (122.40 kg/plot) and P2M2 (120.07 kg/plot). Minimum value of yield (107.36 kg/plot) was recorded in plants which were produced on flat beds without mulch (P2M3). The effect of planting methods and mulches (M × T) was also significant for the year 2018-2019 as well as when the data were pooled data, but non significant during the experimentation year of 2017-2018. Maximum yield per plot (133.23 kg) was recorded in treatment combination M1T(black mulch with two stem training system). This treatment combination was significantly superior over M2T1 (raised bed with silver/black mulch) producing 129.85 kg/plot yield, M1T2 (125.61 kg/plot) and M2T2 (123.42 kg/plot). Minimum yield (108.13 kg/plot) was recorded in M3T2 (no mulch with three stem training system) treatment combination. Similarly P×T (planting methods and training systems) interaction showed non significant effects on yield per plot. Maximum value (130.65 kg) for yield per plot was recorded on those plants which were grown on raised bed and trained to two stem training system (P1T1) and minimum (113.63 kg/plot) in P2T2 (flat bed with three stem training system). Similar results were recorded for P×M, M×T and P×T interactions during both the years of study.The pooled data pertaining to the effect of three way interactions (P×M ×T) have been presented in Table 2. The analysis of variance showed that there was also the significant effect of various interactions on yield per plot during both the years as well as when the data was pooled, however, maximum value (140.71 kg/plot) was recorded in the plants grown on raised bed, black mulch with two stem training system (P1M1T1) which was followed (136.16 kg/plot) by P1M2T1 (raised bed, silver/black mulch with two stem training system) and minimum (105.26 kg/plot) was recorded in those plants grown on flat bed with no mulch and three stem training system (P2M3T2). The pooled data pertaining to the effect of three way interactions (P× M×T) have been presented in Table 3. The analysis of variance showed that there was no effect of various interactions on yield per plot during both the years as well as when the data was pooled, however, maximum value (140.71 kg/plot) was recorded in the plants grown on raised bed, black mulch with two stem training system (P1M1T1) which was followed (136.16 kg/plot) by P1M2T1 (raised bed, silver/black mulch with two stem training system) and minimum (105.26 kg/plot) was recorded in those plants grown on flat bed with no mulch and three stem training system (P2M3T2).

Table 1: Effect of planting methods, plastic mulches and training systems on fruit yield per plot of tomato.



Table 2: Effect of two way interactions P×M, M×T and P×T on fruit yield per plot of tomato.



Table 3: Effect of P × M × T interaction on fruit yield per plot.



The increased yield of tomato fruits on raised beds may be due to higher soil organic matter content along with higher phosphorus and potassium levels (Aykas et al. 2005). Alagoz and Ozer (2019) observed that soil compaction in flat planting system was higher values in raised bed planting system and compaction values increased through the soil profile. Other reasons for increased yield on raised beds could be longer growing period, warming up of the bed, improved drainage, better management of water, fertilizers, mulch and other soil amendments and reduced foot trafficing (Berle and Westerfield, 2013; Bahadur et al. 2013)
       
According to Sarkar and Singh (2007), black mulching enhanced growth and yield of plants, while they also concluded that mulching especially black mulch reduced leaching of nutrients, reduced weed problem, reduced evapotranspiration of soil water and increased water use efficiency. Angmo et al. (2018) were also of opinion that reduced competition with weeds, higher soil temperature, reduced attack of soil pathogens and breakdown of phytotoxic substances are responsible for higher yield in the plants grown on black mulch.
       
The two stem training system noticed significant and maximum fruit yield over other levels of training systems. Increased yield in two stem training system might be attributed to availability of more space for individual plant growth, more leaf area for better photosynthesis, ample sunlight and aeration. These findings are in conformity with the work of Bhattarai et al. (2015) and Singh and Kumar (2005) in cherry tomato. Ara et al. (2007) also recorded higher yield in two stem pruned plants as compared to single stem pruned.
 
 

  1. Alagoz, G. and Ozer, H. (2019).  The effects of planting systems on soil biology and quality attributes of Tomatoes. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 65(3): 421-433.

  2. Angmo, S., Bhatt, R.P., Paljor, E., Dolkar, P., Kumar, B., Chaurasia, O.P. and Stobdan, T. (2018). Black polyethylene mulch doubled tomato yield in a low-input system in arid trans- himalayanladakh region. Defence Life Science Journal. 3(1): 80-84. 

  3. Ara, N., Bashar, M.K., Begum, S. and Kakon, S.S. (2007). Effect of spacing and stem pruning on the growth and yield of tomato. International Journal of Sustainable Crop Production. 2: 35-39.

  4. Ashrafuzzaman, M., Abdul Halim, M., Mohd Razi, Ismail, Shahidullah, S.M. and Alamgir, Hossain, M. (2011). Effect of plastic mulch on growth and yield of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology. 54(2): 321-330.

  5. Awodoyin, R.O., Ogbeide, F.I. and Olufemi, Oluwole. (2007). Effects of three mulch types on the growth and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum mill.) and weed suppression in Ibadan, Rainforest-Savanna transition zone of Nigeria. Tropical Agricultural Research and Extension. 10: 53-60.

  6. Aykas, E., Yalcýn, H. and Çakr, E. (2005). Conservation tillage methods and direct seeding. Journal of Agriculture. Faculty Ege University. 42(3): 195-205.

  7. Bahadur, A., Singh, A.K. and Singh, K.P. (2013). Effect of planting systems and mulching on soil hydrothermal regime, plant physiology, yield and water use efficiency in tomato. Indian Journal of Horticulture. 70: 48-53.

  8. Berle, D. and Westerfield, R. (2013). Raised beds vs. in-ground gardens. The university of Georgia. In: Cooperative Extension.

  9. Bhattarai, P., Kaushik, R.A., Ameta, K.D., Jain, H.K., Kaushik, M.K. and Sharma, F.L. (2015). Effect of plant geometry and fertigation on growth and yield of cherry tomato (Solanum lycopersicon var. cerasiforme) under zero energy poly house conditions. Indian Journal of Horticulture. 72(2): 297-301.

  10. Diaz-Perez, J.C. (2010). Bell pepper (Capsicum annum L.) grown on plastic film mulches: effects on crop microenvironment, physiological attributes and fruit yield. Horticulture Science. 45: 1196-1204.

  11. Ghosh, P.K., Dayal, D., Bandyopadhyay, K.K., and Mohanty, M. (2006). Evaluation of straw and polythene mulch for enhancing productivity of irrigated summer groundnut. Field Crops Research. 99(2): 76-86.

  12. Kader, M.A., Senge, M., Mojid, M.A. and Ito, K. (2017). Recent advances in mulching materials and methods for modifying soil environment. Soil and Tillage Research. 168: 155-166.

  13. Kosterna, E. (2014). The effect of covering and mulching on the soil temperature, growth and yield of tomato. Folia Horticulturae. 26(2): 91-101.

  14. Kumar Deepak, S. and Lal Raju, B. (2012). Effect of mulching on crop production under rainfed condition: A review. International Journal of Research in Chemistry and Environment. 2(2): 8-20.

  15. Kumar, A., Sharma, K.D. and Yadav, A. (2010). Enhancing yield and water productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum) through furrow irrigated raised bed system in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 80(3): 198-202.

  16. Kumar, A., Singh, B., Kumar, S. and Kumar, P. (2015). Furrow irrigated raised bed (FIRB) planting technique for improving yield and profitability of garlic crop. Annals of Horticulture. 8(1): 61-64.

  17. Lamont Jr, W.J. (2005). Plastics: Modifying the microclimate for the production of vegetable crops. Horticulture Technology. 477-481.

  18. Sarkar, S. and Singh, S.R. (2007). Interactive effect of tillage depth and mulch on soil temperature, productivity and water use pattern of rainfed barley (Hordium vulgare L). Soil and Tillage Research. 92(1-2): 79-86.

  19. Singh, B. and Kumar, M. (2005). Effect of plant spacing and stem pruning on growth and yield of cherry tomato in greenhouse. Haryana Journal of Horticultural Sciences. 34(1-2): 179- 180.

  20. Zhang, J., Sun, J., Duan, A., Wang, J., Shen, X. and Liu, X. (2007). Effects of different planting patterns on water use and yield performance of winter wheat in the Huang-Huai- Hai plain of China. Agriculture Water Management. 92: 41-47.

Editorial Board

View all (0)