Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 44 issue 1 (february 2024) : 94-99

Understanding of Gene Action for Nutritional Traits in Elite Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Crosses

N. Lingaiah2,*, Surender Raju1, N. Sarla1, K. Radhika1, V. Venkanna1, D. Vishnu Vardhan Reddy1
1Regional Agricultural Research Station, Warangal-506 007, Telangana, India.
2Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Agricultural College, Warangal-506 007, Telangana, India.
Cite article:- Lingaiah N., Raju Surender, Sarla N., Radhika K., Venkanna V., Reddy Vardhan Vishnu D. (2024). Understanding of Gene Action for Nutritional Traits in Elite Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Crosses . Agricultural Science Digest. 44(1): 94-99. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5330.
Background: The nature of inheritance and type of gene action governing nutritional traits are complex, hence a better understanding of the factors that contribute to the overall grain quality of rice will lay the foundation for developing new breeding and selection strategies for combining high quality with high yield. The present investigation was carried out to understand the gene action and inheritance of yield and nutritional quality traits in rice. 

Methods: Crosses were effected with ten parents in diallel fashion without reciprocals during kharif, 2014, in the next rabi 2014-15 itself, all the 45 F1s without reciprocals along with parents and two check varieties were grown for producing sufficient F2 seed. The data obtained from F1s and parents were analysed as per Method II (F1s + parents) and Model - I (fixed effect) of Griffing (1956) for combining ability.

Result: In the present study, cross combinations viz., WGL-32100 x DRR Dhan-40, Ramappa x RP-Bio-5478-176 for intermediate amylose, WGL-32100 x Ramappa for high protein content, MTU 1010 x RP-Bio-5478-166, WGL-32100 x RP-Bio-5478-166 for iron concentration and RP-Bio-5478-166 x DRR Dhan-40, for zinc concentration were identified as the top ranking ones for further advancement.
Along with yield, grain and nutritional quality has also become a primary consideration in rice breeding programs not only in India but also in various rice growing countries across the world. Grain quality and nutritional characteristics are very important in rice breeding as it is predominantly consumed as a whole grain. Like yield, grain quality is not easily amenable to selection due to its complex nature. Lack of clear cut perception regarding the component traits of good quality rice is one of the important reasons for the tardy progress in breeding for rice varieties with fine grain quality. Genetic variation for micronutrients in rice was studied and reported for iron and zinc (Gregario et al., 2000 and Zhang et al., 2004). The range of iron and zinc concentrations in brown rice was 6.3-4.4 ppm and 13.5-28.4 ppm respectively. Nutritional elements like protein, iron and zinc contents were included as important quality attributes in view of their role in human health maintenance. There is vast genetic potential to increase the concentration of Fe and Zn in rice grains is possible (Gregario, 2002). Incorporation of these nutritional traits into high yielding semi dwarf varieties are essential in this era of quality breeding. Genetic enhancement of key food crops with enhanced nutrients is advocated as the most promising approach to address the problem of malnutrition (Graham et al., 2001; Bouis, 2002) which can be possible with understanding the genetic analysis among quality and nutritional traits in rice.

Diallel analysis helps in the selection of suitable parents for use in hybridization programme as well as in the choice of appropriate breeding procedure for the genetic improvement of various quantitative traits. Combining ability analysis helps in the identification of parents with high general combining ability (gca) effects and cross combinations with high specific combining effects (sca) for commercial exploitation of heterosis and isolation of pure lines among the progenies of the heterotic hybrids. The nature of inheritance and type of gene action governing nutritional traits are many and complex and when genetically manipulated to some extent paved the way for the success in quality improvement through conventional breeding methods. Hence a better understanding of the factors that contribute to the overall grain quality of rice will lay the foundation for developing new breeding and selection strategies for combining high quality with high yield.

World Health Organization estimates that nearly 5.6 billion people are suffering from Iron deficiency and that the problem is severe enough to cause anemica to 2 billion people. An estimated 58% of pregnant women in developing countries are anemic and their infants are more likely to be born with low birth weight and depleted Iron stores. Recently more interest is being devoted to developing nutritious rice enriched with essential micro nutrients such as iron and zinc that are associated with major health problems or “hidden hunger”. These are the most prevalent micro nutrient deficiencies in humans especially in rural area, and increasing the content of these elements in the polished rice grains could considerably benefit human health.

Keeping in view the above perspectives, the present investigation was carried out to understand the genetics and inheritance of quality and nutritional traits.
The present investigation was carried out at the Regional Agricultural Research Station, Warangal, Telangana state which is located at an altitude of 304 M above MSL, 17.97°N latitude and 79.60°E longitude during 2 years 2014-15 and 2015-16 utilizing both Kharif and Rabi crop seasons in each year. The experimental material for combining ability, heterosis and inbreeding depression studies comprised of 10 parents viz., MTU 1010, WGL-32100, Ramappa, RP-Bio-5478-270, RP-Bio-5478-166, RP-Bio-5478-176, DRR Dhan-40, RP-Bio-5478-185, NH-686, NH-787, their 45 F1 hybrids  (generated from ten parents, crossed in diallel fashion without reciprocals during previous Kharif, 2014) and corresponding F2’s (seed obtained from F1 generation raised during  successive Rabi, 2014-15) and two promising check varieties viz. BPT 5204 and Chittimuthyalu.

After the crosses were effected during kharif, 2014, in the next rabi 2014-15 itself, all the 45 F1s without reciprocals along with parents and two check varieties were grown for producing sufficient F2 seed. The material (Parents, F1s and F2s) was planted in randomized block design replicating thrice during final season Kharif, 2015 in a separate plot for studying combining ability, heterosis and inbreeding depression. Parents, hybrids and check varieties were planted in one row of 3.0 m length adopting a spacing of 20 cm between the row and 15 cm between the plants within a row with single seedling per hill.

Amylose (%) content in the rice sample was estimated as per the procedure given by Jennings et al., (1979). Nitrogen content of the rice grain was estimated by following micro-kjeldahl method (Aoac 1980) to estimate crude protein in rice grains. Grain iron and zinc concentrations were determined by X-Ray fluorescence Spectrometry (XRF) (EDXRF, model-X-supreme8000) at ICAR- Indian Institute of Rice Research (ICAR-IIRR), Hyderabad. The data obtained from F1s and parents were analysed as per Method II (F1s + parents) and Model – I (fixed effect) of Griffing (1956) for combining ability to know the gene action governing the nutritional traits inheritance for better understanding.
The success of any breeding programme depends on selection of parents for hybridization and the choice of crosses to be advanced from the several crosses effected. This indicates that prior information on genetic background of the parents to be combined through crossing is very important. One of the techniques, widely used to extract information about the genetic system governing the inheritance of attributes, is the diallel analysis (Arunachalam, 1976). This design gives an idea about the relative magnitude of additive and non-additive components of heritable variance in expression of a trait. In case of diallel analysis developed by Griffing (1956) the additive and dominance components can be studied precisely in the absence of epistasis.  Super crosses and parents with high SCA effects and GCA effects can be picked up.

Analysis of variance for combining ability for nutritional traits (Table 1) indicated that general combining ability (GCA) mean squares were significant for all the characters. For specific combining ability (SCA), mean squares were significant for all the characters. The results were in accordance with the findings of Lingaiah, et al., (2018). In the present investigation, the magnitude of specific combining ability variances was higher than that of general combining ability for all the traits indicating greater role of non- additive gene action in controlling the traits. (Table 2). 

Table 1: Mean sum of squares of ten parents and forty five F1 s in rice for nutritional traits.



Table 2: Gene action and proportions of GCA and SCA variances for grain quality traits.



In rice, eating quality is chiefly influenced by amylose and amylopectin in the grain. Rice with intermediate (20-25%) or low to intermediate amylose contents (18-20%) cook dry, pluffy and are softy on cooling. The analysis of gene action for amylose revealed the preponderance of non additive gene action. Belhekar et al., (2017) reported similar result of non additive gene action for amylose content.  For amylase content, out of ten parents studied, only three parents WGL-32100 (2.655), Ramappa (1.913) and RP-Bio-5478-270 (1.753) had shown significant positive effects where as all the remaining parents had shown significant negative GCA effects (Table 3). Thirteen hybrids had shown significant positive SCA effects, the highest SCA effect was observed in the cross NH-686 x NH-787 (3.041). The variation ranged from -3.886 (DRR Dhan-40 x NH-787) to 3.041 (NH-686 x NH-787) for amylase content (Table 4).   

Table 3: General combining ability (GCA) effects of parents for nutritional traits in rice.



Table 4: Specific combining ability (sca) effects of crosses for nutritional traits in rice.



The present study indicated that the protein content is under the control of non additive gene action. Similar gene effects were observed by Mohammad Naseer (2016). Three parents viz., RP-Bio-5478-270 (0667), NH-787 (0.494) and WGL-32100 (0.450) have highly positive and significant GCA effect, which are highly desirable and were found as good general combiners for this trait. The parents viz., RP-Bio-5478-166 (-0.436 and DRR Dhan-40 (-0.436) had significant negative GCA effects for protein content.  Thirteen hybrids had shown significant positive SCA effects, among these three hybrids DRR Dhan-40 x NH-787 (2.179), MTU 1010 x RP-Bio-5478-166 (1.978) and WGL-32100 x NH-686 (1.948) recorded highest SCA effects. Eighteen hybrids exhibited significant negative SCA effects for amylase content of which the hybrid, Ramappa x RP-Bio-5478-270 (-2.004) recorded highest significant negative SCA effect for protein (Table 4).

For iron content, the results indicated that RP-Bio-5478-176 and RP-Bio-5478 -185 have highly positive and significant GCA effect, which are highly desirable and were found as good general combiners for this trait. The parents viz., Ramappa and RP-Bio-5478-166 had significant negative GCA effects. Out of forty five crosses studied, fourteen crosses had significant positive SCA effects where as nineteen crosses manifested significant negative SCA effects. Highest positive SCA effect was observed in MTU 1010 x DRR Dhan-40 (2.492) followed by RP-Bio-5478-185 x NH-686 (2.368), while highest significant negative SCA effect was recorded in the cross, RP-Bio-5478-185 x NH-787 (-1.994) for iron content. 

Non-additive gene action was mostly responsible for expression of iron and zinc contents which was in confirmation with the result of Adilakshmi and Upendra (2014). Three parents viz., RP-Bio-5478-176, RP-Bio-5478-185 and DRR Dhan-40 had exhibited significant positive GCA effects, among them RP-Bio-5478-176 had highest value and considered as good general combiner for this trait. Highly significant negative GCA effects were observed in WGL-32100 and MTU 1010 (Table 3). Fourteen crosses showed significant positive SCA effects, among these, the crosses Ramappa x RP-Bio-5478-166 (5.198), MTU 1010x RP-Bio-5478-270 (4.033), MTU 1010 x RP-Bio-5478-166 (3.828), MTU 1010 x Ramappa (3.701), MTU 1010 x RP-Bio-5478-185 (3.603) and RP-Bio-5478-270 x DRR Dhan-40  (3.224) were the top six cross combinations with higher magnitude. The SCA effects for zinc content ranged from -6.085 (Ramappa x RP-Bio-5478-176) to 5.198 (Ramappa x RP-Bio-5478-166). Seventeen crosses showed significant negative SCA effects for this trait of zinc content. 

Apart from various cooking quality parameters, estimation of amylose content is inevitable in rice, because it plays greater role in texture of cooked rice. Rice with higher amylose content (>25%) will cook dry, pluffy but become hard on cooling whereas, those with low amylose content (<18-20%) will be sticky. Hence, rice with intermediate amylose content which cook dry, pluffy and be soft on cooling would be mostly preferred in India. Accordingly, the 7 crosses with per se performance and SCA effects falling in intermediate range viz., WGL-32100 x DRR Dhan - 40  Ramappa x RP-Bio-5478-176, Ramappa x DRR Dhan-40 , Ramappa x RP-Bio-5478-185, RP-Bio-5478-270 x RP-Bio-5478-176, RP-Bio-5478-270 x RP-Bio-5478-185 and RP-Bio-5478-176 x DRR Dhan-40  were rated as top ranking ones. As these F1 hybrids were generated from the parents having high x low GCA effects, instead of direct selection alternative population improvement would be more profitable. The crosses viz., RP-Bio-5478-270 x NH-686 and RP-Bio-5478-270 x NH-787, although, have SCA effects at desirable level are not suggested for further improvement due to possession of very low amylose content.

Rice varieties with higher protein content (more than 9-10%) are highly desirable from the point of nutritional quality. In the material studied, out of 13 crosses with significant SCA effects, three crosses (WGL-32100 x Ramappa, Ramappa x RP-Bio-5478-166 and RP-Bio-5478-176 x NH-686) were considered as most promising ones, when the magnitudes of both SCA effects and per se performance were taken into consideration. For improvement of protein content, simple direct selection (pedigree method) would be highly useful with respect to one best specific cross viz., WGL-32100 x Ramappa in which parents were of high x high GCA effects and prevalence of additive main and interaction effects were noticed. Anyanwu and  Obi (2015) reported transgressive segregants with high protein content than the parents in certain hybrids (WATA 4 x IR57689-73, WTA 4 x Max). For such crosses, Manuel and Palaniswamy (1989) were of the opinion that there could be interaction between positive alleles in a cross involving high x high combiners which can be fixed in subsequent generations if no repulsion phase linkage are involved, as in the case of present findings. In remaining two superior crosses (Ramappa x RP-Bio-5478-166 and RP-Bio-5478-176 x NH-787) with SCA effects, other methods would be profitable. In general, the per se performance of the F1 hybrids has no relation to the SCA effects as per the present study.

In the material studied, although 10 cross combinations registered significant SCA effects, three were (MTU 1010 x RP-Bio-5478-166, WGL-32100 x RP-Bio-5478-166 and RP-Bio-5478-185 x NH-686) were designated as superior ones in terms of SCA effects as well as mean performance for iron content. Direct selection in one specific cross viz., RP-Bio-5478-185 x NH-686 would be highly fetching as the parents possessed high x high GCA effects. Fortunately, highest mean (15.34) was also associated with this cross which is next to DRR Dhan-40 x NH-686 hybrid combination and more than that of best check variety Chittimuthyalu (13.51). In other crosses, where either low x low or low x medium or high x low GCA parents were involved, population improvement or hybrid breeding is recommended depending on the cross.

In the study conducted by Adilakshmii and Upendra (2014), superior crosses resulted from high x low, high x high and low x low GCA parents and GCA/SCA variance less than 1, which is in support of present findings.

Another important micro nutrient after iron is zinc, for which a total of 14 crosses exhibited significant SCA effects (Table 4). A perusal of these crosses indicated that high per se performance coupled with high SCA effects was exhibited by 5 crosses, interestingly, three F1 hybrids (RP-Bio-5478-166 x DRR Dhan-40, RP-Bio-5478-176 x DRR Dhan-40 and RP-Bio-5478-176 x NH-787) which were generated from high x high GCA combinations, suggested that improvement for zinc content would be simple through the common pedigree method.

From the foregoing discussion, the best specific crosses for cooking quality traits including amylase content are WGL-32100 x RP-Bio-5478 -185 (high x low), Ramappa x RP-Bio-5478-176 (high x low), and Ramappa x RP-Bio-5478 -185 (high x low) and interestingly the crosses were highly promosing for cooking quality traits wherever the parent Ramappa was involved.

A total of six specific crosses viz., MTU 1010 x RP-Bio-5478-166 (low x low), WGL-32100 x RP-Bio-5478-166 (low x low) and RP-Bio-5478-185 x NH-686 (high x high) for iron content improvement and for zinc enrichment RP-Bio-5478-166 x DRR Dhan-40  (high x high), RP-Bio-5478-176 x DRR Dhan-40  (high x high) and RP-Bio-5478-176 x NH-787 (high x high) were found to be useful. Among the parents WGL-32100 and Ramappa were graded as top ranking parents because high SCA effects, high per se performance in desirable direction was noticed in the crosses where these parents were included (Table 5).

Table 5: Top ranking crosses with high SCA and mean for grain nutritional traits.



Overall, for amylose content, crosses falling  in intermediate range viz., WGL-32100 x DRR Dhan– 40,Ramappa x RP-Bio-5478-176, Ramappa x DRR Dhan-40 , Ramappa x RP-Bio-5478-185, RP-Bio-5478-270 x RP-Bio-5478-176, RP-Bio-5478-270 x RP-Bio-5478-185 and RP-Bio-5478-176 x DRR Dhan-40  were rated as top ranking ones (Table 5). As these F1 hybrids were generated from the parents having high x low GCA effects, instead of direct selection alternative population improvement would be more profitable. Out of three best crosses (WGL-32100 x Ramappa, Ramappa x RP-Bio-5478-166 and RP-Bio-5478-176 x NH-686), for improvement of protein content, simple direct selection (pedigree method) would be highly useful with respect to one best specific cross viz., WGL-32100 x Ramappa in which parents were of high x high GCA effects were involved. Although 10 cross combinations registered significant SCA effects, three were (MTU 1010 x RP-Bio-5478-166, WGL-32100 x RP-Bio-5478-166 and RP-Bio-5478-185 x NH-686) were designated as superior ones for iron content. Direct selection in one specific cross viz., RP-Bio-5478-185 x NH-686 would be highly fetching as the parents possessed high x high GCA effects. Highest mean (15.34 ppm) was also associated with this cross which is next to DRR Dhan-40 x NH-686 hybrid combination and more than that of best check variety Chittimuthyalu (13.51 ppm) (Table 5).  Three F1 hybrids (RP-Bio-5478-166 x DRR Dhan-40, RP-Bio-5478-176 x DRR Dhan-40 and RP-Bio-5478-176 x NH-787) which were generated from high x high GCA combinations, were recommended for improvement for zinc content through the common pedigree method.
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  1. Adilakshmii, D. and Upendra, A. (2014). Combining ability analysis for quality and nutritional traits in rice. International Journal of Farm Sciences. 4: 15-23. 

  2. Anyanwu, C.P. and Obi, I.U. (2015). Heterosis and combining ability effects of protein content on rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes. Journal of Plant breeding and Crop Science. 7: 256-261. 

  3. A.O.A.C. (1980). Official methods of analysis, 13th ed. Association of official analytical chemists. Washington, D.C. 376-384.

  4. Arunachalam, V. (1976). Evaluation of diallel crosses by graphical and combining ability methods, Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding. 36: 358-366. 

  5. Belhekar, P.S., Meheta, H.D., Patil, H.M., Bhor T.J., Patil, Y.J and Lende, N.S. (2017). Heterosis and combining ability in aromatic hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L.) International Journal of Chemical Studies. 5: 1341-1345.

  6. Bouis, H.E. (2002). Plant breeding: A new tool for fighting micronutrient malnutrition. J. Nutr. 132: 491-494. 

  7. Graham, R.D., Welch, R.M., Bouis, H.F. (2001). Addressing micronutrient malnutrition through enhancing the nutritional quality of staple foods: principles, perspectives and knowledge gaps. Adv. Agron. 70: 77-142.

  8. Gregario, G.B., Senadhira, D., Htut, H and graham, R.D. 2000. Breeding for trace mineral density in rice. Food Nutrition. Bulletin. 21: 382-386. 

  9. Gregario, G.B. (2002). Progress in breeding for trace minerals in staple crops. Journal of Nutrition. 132: 500-502. 

  10. Griffing, B. (1956). A generilsed treatment of the use of diallel crosses in quantitative inheritance. Heredity. 10: 31-50.

  11. Jennings, P.R., Coffman, W.R., Kaufman, M.H.E. (1979). Grain quality: Rice improvement. International Rice Research institute, Philippines. Chapter. 6: 101-120. 

  12. Lingaiah, N., Sarla, N., Venkanna, V., Surender Raju Ch., Radhika, K and Vishnu Vardhan Reddy, D. (2018). Combining ability analysis in Iron and Zinc Rich Rice Genotypes. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 7: 3745-3751. 

  13. Manuel, W and Palaniswamy, S. (1989). Line x tester analysis of cobining ability in rice. Oryza. 26: 27-32.

  14. Mohammad Naseer, Singh., Surendra, Ahmad., Ekhlaque., Tewari, Salil. (2016). Assessment of combining ability for productivity and quality traits in aromatic rice (Oryza sativa L.). International Journal of Bio Resource and Stress Management. 7: 525-532. 

  15. Zhang, M.W., Guo, B.J and Peng, Z.M. (2004). Genetic effects of Fe, Zn, Mn and P content in Indica black pericarp rice and their genetic correlations with grain characteristics. Euphytica. 135: 315-323. 

     

Editorial Board

View all (0)