The success of any breeding programme depends on selection of parents for hybridization and the choice of crosses to be advanced from the several crosses effected. This indicates that prior information on genetic background of the parents to be combined through crossing is very important. One of the techniques, widely used to extract information about the genetic system governing the inheritance of attributes, is the diallel analysis
(Arunachalam, 1976). This design gives an idea about the relative magnitude of additive and non-additive components of heritable variance in expression of a trait. In case of diallel analysis developed by
Griffing (1956) the additive and dominance components can be studied precisely in the absence of epistasis. Super crosses and parents with high
SCA effects and
GCA effects can be picked up.
Analysis of variance for combining ability for nutritional traits (Table 1) indicated that general combining ability (
GCA) mean squares were significant for all the characters. For specific combining ability (
SCA), mean squares were significant for all the characters. The results were in accordance with the findings of
Lingaiah, et al., (2018). In the present investigation, the magnitude of specific combining ability variances was higher than that of general combining ability for all the traits indicating greater role of non- additive gene action in controlling the traits. (Table 2).
In rice, eating quality is chiefly influenced by amylose and amylopectin in the grain. Rice with intermediate (20-25%) or low to intermediate amylose contents (18-20%) cook dry, pluffy and are softy on cooling. The analysis of gene action for amylose revealed the preponderance of non additive gene action.
Belhekar et al., (2017) reported similar result of non additive gene action for amylose content. For amylase content, out of ten parents studied, only three parents WGL-32100 (2.655), Ramappa (1.913) and RP-Bio-5478-270 (1.753) had shown significant positive effects where as all the remaining parents had shown significant negative
GCA effects (Table 3). Thirteen hybrids had shown significant positive
SCA effects, the highest SCA effect was observed in the cross NH-686 x NH-787 (3.041). The variation ranged from -3.886 (DRR Dhan-40 x NH-787) to 3.041 (NH-686 x NH-787) for amylase content (Table 4).
The present study indicated that the protein content is under the control of non additive gene action. Similar gene effects were observed by
Mohammad Naseer (2016). Three parents
viz., RP-Bio-5478-270 (0667), NH-787 (0.494) and WGL-32100 (0.450) have highly positive and significant
GCA effect, which are highly desirable and were found as good general combiners for this trait. The parents
viz., RP-Bio-5478-166 (-0.436 and DRR Dhan-40 (-0.436) had significant negative
GCA effects for protein content. Thirteen hybrids had shown significant positive
SCA effects, among these three hybrids DRR Dhan-40 x NH-787 (2.179), MTU 1010 x RP-Bio-5478-166 (1.978) and WGL-32100 x NH-686 (1.948) recorded highest
SCA effects. Eighteen hybrids exhibited significant negative
SCA effects for amylase content of which the hybrid, Ramappa x RP-Bio-5478-270 (-2.004) recorded highest significant negative
SCA effect for protein (Table 4).
For iron content, the results indicated that RP-Bio-5478-176 and RP-Bio-5478 -185 have highly positive and significant
GCA effect, which are highly desirable and were found as good general combiners for this trait. The parents
viz., Ramappa and RP-Bio-5478-166 had significant negative
GCA effects. Out of forty five crosses studied, fourteen crosses had significant positive
SCA effects where as nineteen crosses manifested significant negative
SCA effects. Highest positive
SCA effect was observed in MTU 1010 x DRR Dhan-40 (2.492) followed by RP-Bio-5478-185 x NH-686 (2.368), while highest significant negative
SCA effect was recorded in the cross, RP-Bio-5478-185 x NH-787 (-1.994) for iron content.
Non-additive gene action was mostly responsible for expression of iron and zinc contents which was in confirmation with the result of
Adilakshmi and Upendra (2014). Three parents
viz., RP-Bio-5478-176, RP-Bio-5478-185 and DRR Dhan-40 had exhibited significant positive
GCA effects, among them RP-Bio-5478-176 had highest value and considered as good general combiner for this trait. Highly significant negative GCA effects were observed in WGL-32100 and MTU 1010 (Table 3). Fourteen crosses showed significant positive
SCA effects, among these, the crosses Ramappa x RP-Bio-5478-166 (5.198), MTU 1010x RP-Bio-5478-270 (4.033), MTU 1010 x RP-Bio-5478-166 (3.828), MTU 1010 x Ramappa (3.701), MTU 1010 x RP-Bio-5478-185 (3.603) and RP-Bio-5478-270 x DRR Dhan-40 (3.224) were the top six cross combinations with higher magnitude. The
SCA effects for zinc content ranged from -6.085 (Ramappa x RP-Bio-5478-176) to 5.198 (Ramappa x RP-Bio-5478-166). Seventeen crosses showed significant negative
SCA effects for this trait of zinc content.
Apart from various cooking quality parameters, estimation of amylose content is inevitable in rice, because it plays greater role in texture of cooked rice. Rice with higher amylose content (>25%) will cook dry, pluffy but become hard on cooling whereas, those with low amylose content (<18-20%) will be sticky. Hence, rice with intermediate amylose content which cook dry, pluffy and be soft on cooling would be mostly preferred in India. Accordingly, the 7 crosses with
per se performance and
SCA effects falling in intermediate range
viz., WGL-32100 x DRR Dhan - 40 Ramappa x RP-Bio-5478-176, Ramappa x DRR Dhan-40 , Ramappa x RP-Bio-5478-185, RP-Bio-5478-270 x RP-Bio-5478-176, RP-Bio-5478-270 x RP-Bio-5478-185 and RP-Bio-5478-176 x DRR Dhan-40 were rated as top ranking ones. As these F1 hybrids were generated from the parents having high x low
GCA effects, instead of direct selection alternative population improvement would be more profitable. The crosses
viz., RP-Bio-5478-270 x NH-686 and RP-Bio-5478-270 x NH-787, although, have
SCA effects at desirable level are not suggested for further improvement due to possession of very low amylose content.
Rice varieties with higher protein content (more than 9-10%) are highly desirable from the point of nutritional quality. In the material studied, out of 13 crosses with significant
SCA effects, three crosses (WGL-32100 x Ramappa, Ramappa x RP-Bio-5478-166 and RP-Bio-5478-176 x NH-686) were considered as most promising ones, when the magnitudes of both
SCA effects and
per se performance were taken into consideration. For improvement of protein content, simple direct selection (pedigree method) would be highly useful with respect to one best specific cross
viz., WGL-32100 x Ramappa in which parents were of high x high
GCA effects and prevalence of additive main and interaction effects were noticed.
Anyanwu and Obi (2015) reported transgressive segregants with high protein content than the parents in certain hybrids (WATA 4 x IR57689-73, WTA 4 x Max). For such crosses,
Manuel and Palaniswamy (1989) were of the opinion that there could be interaction between positive alleles in a cross involving high x high combiners which can be fixed in subsequent generations if no repulsion phase linkage are involved, as in the case of present findings. In remaining two superior crosses (Ramappa x RP-Bio-5478-166 and RP-Bio-5478-176 x NH-787) with
SCA effects, other methods would be profitable. In general, the
per se performance of the F1 hybrids has no relation to the
SCA effects as per the present study.
In the material studied, although 10 cross combinations registered significant
SCA effects, three were (MTU 1010 x RP-Bio-5478-166, WGL-32100 x RP-Bio-5478-166 and RP-Bio-5478-185 x NH-686) were designated as superior ones in terms of
SCA effects as well as mean performance for iron content. Direct selection in one specific cross
viz., RP-Bio-5478-185 x NH-686 would be highly fetching as the parents possessed high x high
GCA effects. Fortunately, highest mean (15.34) was also associated with this cross which is next to DRR Dhan-40 x NH-686 hybrid combination and more than that of best check variety Chittimuthyalu (13.51). In other crosses, where either low x low or low x medium or high x low
GCA parents were involved, population improvement or hybrid breeding is recommended depending on the cross.
In the study conducted by
Adilakshmii and Upendra (2014), superior crosses resulted from high x low, high x high and low x low
GCA parents and
GCA/SCA variance less than 1, which is in support of present findings.
Another important micro nutrient after iron is zinc, for which a total of 14 crosses exhibited significant
SCA effects (Table 4). A perusal of these crosses indicated that high
per se performance coupled with high
SCA effects was exhibited by 5 crosses, interestingly, three F
1 hybrids (RP-Bio-5478-166 x DRR Dhan-40, RP-Bio-5478-176 x DRR Dhan-40 and RP-Bio-5478-176 x NH-787) which were generated from high x high
GCA combinations, suggested that improvement for zinc content would be simple through the common pedigree method.
From the foregoing discussion, the best specific crosses for cooking quality traits including amylase content are WGL-32100 x RP-Bio-5478 -185 (high x low), Ramappa x RP-Bio-5478-176 (high x low), and Ramappa x RP-Bio-5478 -185 (high x low) and interestingly the crosses were highly promosing for cooking quality traits wherever the parent Ramappa was involved.
A total of six specific crosses
viz., MTU 1010 x RP-Bio-5478-166 (low x low), WGL-32100 x RP-Bio-5478-166 (low x low) and RP-Bio-5478-185 x NH-686 (high x high) for iron content improvement and for zinc enrichment RP-Bio-5478-166 x DRR Dhan-40 (high x high), RP-Bio-5478-176 x DRR Dhan-40 (high x high) and RP-Bio-5478-176 x NH-787 (high x high) were found to be useful. Among the parents WGL-32100 and Ramappa were graded as top ranking parents because high
SCA effects, high
per se performance in desirable direction was noticed in the crosses where these parents were included (Table 5).
Overall, for amylose content, crosses falling in intermediate range
viz., WGL-32100 x DRR Dhan– 40,Ramappa x RP-Bio-5478-176, Ramappa x DRR Dhan-40 , Ramappa x RP-Bio-5478-185, RP-Bio-5478-270 x RP-Bio-5478-176, RP-Bio-5478-270 x RP-Bio-5478-185 and RP-Bio-5478-176 x DRR Dhan-40 were rated as top ranking ones (Table 5). As these F
1 hybrids were generated from the parents having high x low
GCA effects, instead of direct selection alternative population improvement would be more profitable. Out of three best crosses (WGL-32100 x Ramappa, Ramappa x RP-Bio-5478-166 and RP-Bio-5478-176 x NH-686), for improvement of protein content, simple direct selection (pedigree method) would be highly useful with respect to one best specific cross
viz., WGL-32100 x Ramappa in which parents were of high x high
GCA effects were involved. Although 10 cross combinations registered significant
SCA effects, three were (MTU 1010 x RP-Bio-5478-166, WGL-32100 x RP-Bio-5478-166 and RP-Bio-5478-185 x NH-686) were designated as superior ones for iron content. Direct selection in one specific cross
viz., RP-Bio-5478-185 x NH-686 would be highly fetching as the parents possessed high x high
GCA effects. Highest mean (15.34 ppm) was also associated with this cross which is next to DRR Dhan-40 x NH-686 hybrid combination and more than that of best check variety Chittimuthyalu (13.51 ppm) (Table 5). Three F1 hybrids (RP-Bio-5478-166 x DRR Dhan-40, RP-Bio-5478-176 x DRR Dhan-40 and RP-Bio-5478-176 x NH-787) which were generated from high x high
GCA combinations, were recommended for improvement for zinc content through the common pedigree method.