Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 43 issue 2 (april 2023) : 164-169

​Development and Performance Evaluation of a Two-row Mechanical Paddy Transplanter

Sapunii Sebastian1,*, E.V. Thomas2
1School of Agro and Rural Technology, Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati-781 039, Assam, India.
2Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur-721 302, West Bengal, India.
Cite article:- Sebastian Sapunii, Thomas E.V. (2023). ​Development and Performance Evaluation of a Two-row Mechanical Paddy Transplanter . Agricultural Science Digest. 43(2): 164-169. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5328.
Background: Paddy is one of the most important staple food in most south-east Asian countries. It is grown either by direct sowing or by transplanting under wetland conditions depending upon the availability of water. India produces 116.48 million tonnes of rice with a productivity of 2659 kg ha-1. Manual transplanting of rice seedlings by hand is generally done in stooping posture which is laborious and drudgery. It also requires a huge amount of labour during peak season. Considering the need and to suit the hilly region, a two-row manually operated paddy transplanter was developed.

Methods: For picking the seedlings, a four-bar mechanism was selected as the basis of design. The machine construction consists of a float, seedling tray, fixed-fork type finger, chain sprocket system and lugged wheel. For operation, the operator has to rotate the crank handle which transmits the motion through the chain sprocket system and four-bar linkage which in turn picks the seedlings and plants them onto the soil.

Result: The machine was tested in the actual field condition and was working satisfactorily. The designed fixed fork-type finger can hold 5 to 8 seedlings at a time. The developed machine was found to be comfortable working at a speed of 0.5 kmph. The actual field capacity of the machine was 0.02 ha/h.
India is the second-largest producer and consumer of rice in the world after China. On average, India produces 2.2 t/ha (Anonymous, 2013). Rice can be grown by transplanting seedlings in flooded field conditions or by direct sowing of sprouted seedlings depending upon the availability of water (Gaikwad et al., 2014). Japan developed the first rice transplanter during industrialization and it was patented in the year 1898 (Chaitanya et al., 2018). The use of mechanical device for paddy transplanting started in 1955 in Taiwan when a gravity-type hand-operated transplanter was developed.

In India, A 4-row machine is first tested at TTC Budhni and CRRI Cuttack in 1966 but was found to have limitations like higher labor requirements (Anonymous, 1979; Dixit et al., 2007).

Most paddy transplanters used planar four-bar linkage mechanisms with the planting finger forming a coupler point (Singh et al., 1981; Thomas, 2002). Transplanting by machine saved 45% cost of operation and 50% labour as compared to manual transplanting (Dixit et al., 2007).

Power-operated machine, although has high field capacity, is not feasible due to terrain conditions and smaller land holdings in hilly areas. The cost of operation and repair and maintenance facilities also restrict the use of the machine in remote hilly village areas. Considering all these shortcomings, a suitable lightweight and cost-effective machine are needed to mechanize in areas where manual transplantation is still followed. This will result in reducing the labour work and time consumption.
The work was carried out in the Agricultural and Food Engineering Department, IIT Kharagpur, West Bengal during the year 2017-2018.

Various instruments used for experimentations and measurements include Vernier calipers-for measuring girth area of seedlings and various dimensions of different components of the machine, stopwatch-for measuring the speed of operation, scales-for measuring height of seedlings etc, load cell with indicator-for measuring the force required to pull the machine and measuring tape.

The following methods were used for determining different parameters.

Procedure for deciding link length 

(a) A four-bar mechanism was selected for movement of various linkages. For deciding link length, Grashoff’s law was primarily introduced which states that the sum of shortest link and longest link should be less than equal to the sum of remaining links. By keeping one link fixed, the other link lengths were decided on a trial and error basis which should follow the different path while picking the seedlings from the tray and while returning. The finger which is the extension of the coupler should follow a path as shown in Fig 1.

Fig 1: Tracing suitable path for finger movement.

b) Determination of base area of seedlings

The picking finger can be designed based on the area of girth of the seedling where the finger should hold before planting into the puddled soil.

Fig 2 shows location of the seedling to be held at section AA’ by the transplanter finger. The cross section at AA’ is approximated to an ellipse with major axis ‘a’ and minor axis ‘b’ (Choudhury, 1983). The representation of major and minor axes is shown in Fig 3.

Fig 2: Sketch of a seedling used for transplanting.

Fig 3: Shape of cut sectional view of paddy seedling base showing minor and major axis.

The area of cross section can be calculated by using the relationship:
                                                A = π × a × b

A = Cross sectional area of the seedling.
a = Major axis.
b = Minor axis.

c) Size of finger opening

The size of finger opening is determined by using the relationship

The average number of seedlings per hill can be considered to be 5 (Wang et al., 2010).

Average area of cross section of seedlings = 12.24 mm2 (Table 2).
Packing factor = 0.7 (Assumed)

Therefore, required size of finger opening = 
The area of opening of the finger is approximately square in shape. Therefore, Dimension of square = 9.35 mm ~ 10 mm. Say, a 10 mm × 10 mm area was chosen.
d) Hill to hill spacing
This depends on the skill of operator. The operator should maintain constant speed of crank rotation in order to obtain uniform spacing. Higher speed of crank rotation will decrease hill to hill spacing and vice-versa. However, row to row spacing was fixed at 20 cm apart.

e) Planting mechanism
A 2-dimensional four bar linkage mechanism is used for the planting mechanism. Transplanting finger is attached at the extension of the coupler link. Kinematic diagram of the planting mechanism is shown in Fig 4.

Fig 4: Kinematic diagram of planting mechanism.

f) Seedling tray
The seedling tray was fabricated using GI sheet of size 20×30 cm. A slot of size 20 mm width was opened for easy passage of seedling during picking. A slot of 8 mm width was provided for passage of seedling pusher or star wheel. Design of seedling tray is shown in Fig 5.

Fig 5a: Designed seedling tray.

Fig 5b: Placement of seedlings on the tray.

g) Handle
The handle used was of MS hollow pipe having a diameter 15 mm. The length of handle was 98 cm and was inclined at 63° from horizontal.
h) Frame
Frame was fabricated using MS angle of 20×20×3 mm. All the other elements including float, handle, linkages, seedling tray and cage wheel and star wheel mechanism are attached to frame.
i) Lugged wheel and star-wheel mechanism
A lugged wheel and star-wheel mechanism were designed to act as a seedling pusher. The lugged wheel gets power from the ground contact while traveling. On the same shaft, a star wheel is fixed. Hence when the lugged wheel gets rotated, the star wheel also rotates in the same direction in the direction of travel. Thus, the gap in between the teeth of the star wheel pulls down the seedlings up to the finger reach. A photograph of the lugged wheel is shown in Fig 6.

Fig 6: Photograph showing star wheel and lugged wheel.

j) Power transmission
The power is transferred by the rotation of hand crank as shown in Fig 7. It includes two sprockets connected by a chain. One sprocket with 20 teeth is mounted on the crankshaft of the planting mechanism and other sprocket with 40 teeth is mounted on the handle side. One full rotation of the hand crank provides double planting of seedlings. Centre to center distance between two sprockets was kept at 98 cm. Roller chain having a pitch of 1.27 cm was used for transmitting power between two sprockets.

Fig 7: Designed prototype (using Solid works software).

k) Steps for operating the machine
The machine should be operated in the following steps:
1.   The machine should travel by pulling it in the backward direction.
2.   One hand (left hand) should pull the handle and the other hand (right hand) should rotate the crank.
3.   Make sure the seedlings are placed properly and horizontally on the tray.
4.   The level of water should be at least 3-5 cm above the soil surface. Less water increases the pull resistance.
5.   The machine can be pulled and plant the seedling continuously or it can be pulled, stopped at a desired distance and plant the seedlings and repeat the same process.
l) Performance evaluation of the developed transplanter
The developed prototype was tested in the agricultural field at IIT Kharagpur. The field was plowed to a depth of 15 cm and then puddled. The puddle soil was then leveled and was kept undisturbed for one day before testing. The machine was checked and tested in the laboratory to make sure that all the links and parts are working properly as required. The laboratory test mainly deals with the proper picking of seedlings from the tray and the number of seedlings picks per stroke of the finger. The machine was then put in the field condition. Before operating the machine, necessary adjustments like arrangements of seedlings and placement of seedlings on the tray were made and hence no time was wasted during the experiment. The speed of operation of the machine at 0.5 kmph was found to be suitable. However, it depends on the skill of the workers. Plant to plant spacing is to be maintained by the operator. Increasing the speed of operation likely to increase plant to plant spacing and vice-versa.
The two-row manually operated paddy transplanter was developed and fabricated in the workshop of the Agricultural and Food Engineering Department of IIT Kharagpur, West Bengal as shown in Fig 8. The specifications of the machine are given in Table 1. The transplanter was tested in the laboratory as well as on the actual field condition. The various characteristics of paddy seedlings that were used for testings were given in Table 2. Laboratory test result (Table 4) shows that the transplanting mechanism functions properly and it shows that the finger can pick on an average of 5 seedlings per stroke. There were high values of standard deviation in the lab test. This may be due to the reason that during the test, the machine was kept above the ground and that the lugged wheel and star wheel were not involved in delivering the seedlings to the finger. However, this was not the problem during the field tests as given in Table 3. The lab test was done to check if the finger can pick the seedlings properly. The average plant to plant spacing was 17.18 cm. Constant row spacing of 20 cm was maintained as per the design. The number of seedlings per hill was 4.44. The angle of the standing of seedlings per hill was 82.25°. The depth of planting was 3.88 cm. Missing hills per square meter was 3.2. The average force required to pull the machine was found to be 8.856 kg with the corresponding average draft of 4.02 kg as calculated in Table 5.

Fig 8: Photograph showing the developed prototype.

Table 1: Detail specifications of the machine.

Table 2: Various characteristics of paddy seedlings.

Table 3: Different parameters of readings from field tests.

Table 4: Observations of the number of seedlings pick by transplanter fingers in laboratory tests.

Table 5: Force required to pull the machine.

The performance of the developed prototype was satisfactory. The fixed fork finger traversed the path in the form of a loop as per the theoretical design. The designed fixed fork finger type can hold 5 to 8 seedlings at a time. However, the number of seedlings to be held by the finger depends on the size and density of seedlings too. The forward speed of operation at 0.5 kmph was found to be comfortable. The actual field capacity of the two-row machine was 0.02 ha/h.

  1. Anonymous (1979). Rice Transplanter Regional Network for Agricultural Machinery. RNAM Digest 1 Los Banos, Philippines pp 1-24.

  2. Anonymous, (2013). Area, Production and Yield of Rice in India.

  3. Choudhury, A.K. (1983). Design and Development of a Six-Row Manually Operated Paddy Transplanter. Unpublished Thesis, IIT Kharagpur.

  4. Chaitanya, D.N.V., Arunkumar, S., Akhilesh, G.B., Kumara, G.S., Babua, K.N.V.S.A. (2018). Design of Rice Transplanter. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 377(2018) 012037 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/377/1/012037.

  5. Dixit, A., Khurana, R., Singh J. and Singh, G. (2007). Comparative performance of different paddy transplanters developed in India- A review. Agric. Rev. 28(4): 262-269.

  6. Gaikwad, P.B., Shahare, P.U., Pathak, S.V. and Aware, V.V. (2014). Development and performance evaluation of four row self-propelled paddy transplanter. International Journal of Agricultural Engineering. 8(1): 9-14.

  7. Singh, G., Sharma, T.R., Bockhop, C.W., (1985). Field performance evaluation of a manual rice transplanter. J. Agric. Engg. Res. 32: 259-268.

  8. Thomas, E.V. (2002). Development of a mechanism for transplanting rice seedlings. Mechanism and Machine Theory. 37: 395- 410.

  9. Wang, W., Liang, Z., Yang, F., Ma, H., Huang, L. and Liu, M. (2010). Effects of number of seedlings per hill on rice biomass partitioning and yield in a saline-sodic soil. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment. 8(2): 628-633.

Editorial Board

View all (0)