Socio-economic profile of sample apple growers
The analysis of the occupational pattern in (Table 1). revealed that 67.22 per cent of the sample apple growers practiced agriculture as main occupation whereas; only 32.78 percent practiced agriculture as subsidiary occupation. The average annual income of the sample apple farmers was found to be ₹48077.46, ₹75542.86, ₹408333.3 for marginal, small and medium farmers from all sources, respectively. Farm land is scarce in Chenab valley highlands. Unlike cereal crop production which requires large farmland, cultivation of apple requires small plot of land and can be grown around homestead. Therefore, it is wise strategy to promote apple production in such starved farm plots. Apple was also the major cash crop in the highlands of study area. The land holding size of the farm households is highly fragmented and very small averaging. The average area under apple crop for marginal farmers was 0.19 acres, for small farmers 2.55 acres and 5.66 acres for medium farmers. Majority of the farmers ploughed their starved plot of land manually via hand farm tools. Apple production was impacting the livelihood of farming community in a better way. Moreover, the high demand of apple fruit made the apple production an interesting business for rural dwellers.
Age plays a prominent role in the farming activities as it determines the effectiveness and competence of labor availability for apple production. The results in Table 1.1 also showed that majority (32.78 per cent) of the apple growers were in the age group of 41-50 years, followed by 31.67 per cent in the age group of 31-40 years, 21.67 per cent below 30 years of age and above 50 were only 13.89 per cent of the sample apple growers. This indicated that apple cultivation was mainly done by the young adult farmers within the age group of 20-50 years. This agrees with the findings of
Adeola et al (2008),
Sani et al (2010) and
Dauda et al (2014) who said 76.67 per cent are within the age group of 30- 49 years of age. This is because these categories of farmers are still strong and have the ability to supply the required labor in agriculture activities to boost production and also increase resource use efficiency. Among the respondents, 33.89 per cent were illiterate, 19.44 per cent received primary education, 17.22 per cent received intermediate education, 15 per cent received middle education and 14.44 per cent were Graduate or above. About 66.67 per cent of the sample farmers were having nucleus family and 33.33 per cent were having joint family. The proportion of male members in the family was more than their female counterparts. The average family size of sample apple growers was found to be 8.40 for marginal farmers, 7.97 for small farmers and 10.33 for medium farmers.
Constraints in production of apple
It could be observed from (Table 2) that prevalence of apple disease such as Stem Black, Powdery Mildew, Scab, Nectaria Twig Blight, Alternative Twig Blight, Peppery Dark / Pink Disease. Similarly, some of the common pests reported are: Woolly Aphids, San Jose Scale, Stem Borer, Root Borer, Bark Borer had been the major problem faced by the Growers with a mean score of 83.00. During peak agricultural seasons, the wage rate was around ₹350-500 per man-day. However the actual wages varied from location to location depending upon prevailing wage levels for skilled and unskilled labor. Only small and medium farmers had been employing wage laborers, rest of the farmers mostly employed family labor for apple cultivation.
The high labor cost had been the second important problem with a mean score of 72.00. The farmers in the study area did not have knowledge on improved technologies of apple growing and post harvest management. Therefore, the third important problem recognized by the sample apple growers had been the lack of latest technical knowledge with a mean score of 65.00. Farmers paid higher price for pesticides because of the presence of a number of intermediaries in the channel. The marketing efficiency has been relatively low in the channel where farmers purchase pesticides from the traders. Farmers applied pesticides indiscriminately in violation of the scientific recommendations. About one-third of the pesticides available in the market were reported to be either sub-standard or spurious. The existence of unlicensed dealers/ traders has further accentuated the magnitude of malpractices in the pesticide delivery system, similar findings has been shown by
Baba et al, (2012) and
Naqash et al., (2017). Inadequate / expensive / no irrigation facilities, High Cost of pesticides / fungicides, non-availability of quality farmyard manure, lack of timely availability of credit facilities and non-availability of labor during peak period had been the fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth important problems with mean score of 63.50, 60.00, 50.00, 45.00 and 41.00, respectively. No special provisions from government regarding monitoring, finance, precautions, standard pesticides and fungicides and fertilizers had stalled the growth of apple production in the study area.
Moreover, educated members go outside / outmigration of labor and lack of good quality seedlings / saplings in sufficient quantity had been the ninth and tenth problems with mean score of 35.29 and 19.82, respectively. Furthermore, apple production in the study area is characterized by poor agronomic practices resulting in poor yields and quality. The yield can be improved both in quality and quantity through the technological use of clonal rootstocks as reported in the findings of
Earles et al., (1999) and
Reshi et al., (2010). The survey also verified whether farmers apply important agronomic practices or not. Agronomic practices were necessary steps farmers incorporated into their farm management system to improve soil quality, enhance water use, manage crop residual and improve the farming system through optimum application and management of agricultural inputs and technologies. The common agronomic practices on apple production are application of organic fertilizers and farm yard manures, grafting and pruning using appropriate equipment, spacing, intercropping and disease control. In view of that, the study showed that all producers intercrop vegetables, pulses and maize. Similarly, all of them apply organic fertilizer (manure) besides other artificial fertilizers and manures without recommended dosage and also use traditional treatment to control apple disease like apple scab and powdery mildew. Apple production in some areas is organic and hence livestock ownership which is the main source of organic fertilizer in the area is important. Pruning enhances apple fruit production and quality through increased efficiency of light utilization, ease of air circulation through the canopy and decrease incidence of fungal disease. In light with this, the study revealed that majority of the producers mostly marginal farmers did not prune and graft their apple tree for they had no appropriate pruning and grafting equipment. The sampled farmers responded that absence of the pruning and grafting materials at local market and the lack of technical knowledge made them not to do it.
Constraints in marketing of apple
It could be observed from (Table 3) that high cost of transportation had been the major marketing problem faced by the growers with a mean score of 85.59. Lack of transportation facilities had been the second important problem with a mean score of 75.00. The third important problem had been the costly packing material with a mean score of 69.00. Lack of processing units and cooperative society, high commission charges, unorganized marketing and low price paid to farmer, lack of market information and non-availability of market had been the fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth important problems with mean score of 63.00, 59.00, 56.00, 52.00 and 49.00, respectively. The fundamental cause of marketing problems was that growers not being organized either producers or traders. Apple producers must be organized in the study area in order to create significant portion for apple export to distant markets. Moreover, exploitation by middlemen, high perishability of the fruits, not getting remunerative price and non-receipt of payment in time had been the ninth, tenth, eleventh and twelfth problems with mean score of 45.00, 41.00, 37.00 and 32.00, respectively.
In the light of given marketing problems no provisions have been made so far to process the fruit so that income of growers and other intermediaries could be increased manifold. In addition to these marketing problems, less demand of fruit was due to competition of other alternatives and packages not returned to growers had been ranked Thirteenth and Fourteenth with mean score of 14.00 and 0.15, respectively.
In consequence, to solve the marketing problems in the study area apple producers should be organized as federation, cooperative, and union. Off course, unorganized producers are always been alone and are often being exploited by the middlemen. The result of that they do not fix price as they want, dealer and middleman take the considerable share of value added and consumers have to pay more for the goods all this problems will be solved by only establishing legitimately producer organization such as farmers union, producer export union and Research Progressive. The results of the study correspond to that of
Oguz et al (2006) and
Oguz et al (2009).