In general, the magnitudes of genotypic correlation coefficient were higher than their corresponding phenotypic correlation coefficient for all the characters thereby indicating a strong inherent association between various traits. The association is almost same for all the characters except small variations in values at both genotypic and phenotypic level.
Genotypic and phenotypic correlation in both the environment
i.e. E
1 and E
2: Days to 50 percent flowering was observed highly positive significant for days to maturity (0.463, 0.320 and 0.410, 0.366) and negatively significant for number of branches per plant (-0.523, -0.469 and -0.708 -0.559), number of pods per plant (-0.516, -0.423 and -0.666 -0.588), pod length (-0.476,-0.383and -0.432,-0.374), number of seeds per pod (-0.404,-0.339 and -0.649, -0.508) and seed yield per plant (-0.477,-0.474 and -0.404,-0.410). Days to maturity had highly positive significant for test weight (0.283, 0.266 and 0.277, 0.258) and negatively significant for number of pods per plant (-0.324, -0.320 and -0.354, -0.315). Number of branches per plant was observed highly positive significant with number of pods per plant (0.442, 0.383 and 0.616, 0.533), pod length (0.686, 0.586 and 0.421, 0.338) and seed yield per plant (0.282, 0.268 and 0.313, 0.282). Number of pods per plant had highly positive significant for pod length (0.544, 0.484 and 0.426, 0.374), number of seeds per pod (0.314, 0.272 and 0.482, 0.440) and seed yield per plant (0.765, 0.725 and 0.670, 0.651). Pod length and number of seeds per pod were found highly positive significant with seed yield per plant (0.376, 0.348 and 0.351, 0.327) and (0.705, 0.650 and 0.666, 0.640). Test weight was observed negatively significant with proline content in leaves at 60 DAS and maturity (-0.227,-0.226 and -0.305,-0.304) and (-0.222,-0.220 and -0.311,-0.309). Proline content in leaves at 60 DAS was observed highly positive significant with proline content in leaves at maturity (0.999, 0.989 and 1.000, 0.995) (Table 2). Significant correlation of characters suggested that there is much scope for direct and indirect selection for further improvement which means by improving of these traits we can achieve the improvement with respect to seed yield per plant and positive selection should be employed for these traits to improve seed yield. However, there were generally negative and significant genotypic and phenotypic relationships between seed yield per plant with days to 50 percent flowering. The trait days to 50 per cent flowering can also be used as a selection criterion for increasing yield only when negative selection is practiced. This finding is in agreement with the findings of
Pushpa et al., (2010), Jain et al., (2013), Kole and Saha (2013),
Singh (2014) and
Gurjar et al., (2016).
Path coefficient analysis
In the present investigation path coefficient analysis was carried out for characters under study using genotypic and phenotypic correlation coefficient and taking seed yield per plant as dependable variable, in order to see the causal factor and also to identify the components which are responsible for producing seed yield per plant. The genotypic and phenotypic path coefficient analysis revealed that number of pods per plant (0.693, 0.602 and 1.030, 0.754), number of seeds per pod (0.396, 0.378 and 0.490, 0.421) and test weight (0.338, 0.304 and 0.405, 0.368) gave the highest direct effect on seed yield per plant in both the environments
i.e. normal (E
1) and limited (E
2) irrigation condition (Table 3). This suggests that these traits directly contribute towards seed yield per plant. So, importance is given for these traits during crop improvement programme to improve seed yield per plant. The several studies have shown importance by various scientists reported by
Dashora et al., (2011),
Fikreselassie et al., (2012) and
Yadav et al., (2013). Negligible positive direct effects were exerted by trait like, plant height at maturity in both the environments
i.e. normal (E
1) and limited (E
2) irrigation condition showing that this trait contribute very less to seed yield per plant. This result is in agreement with the findings of
Jain et al., (2013). The value of residual effect (0.086, 0.155 and 0.238, 0.241) in both the environments
i.e. normal (E
1) and limited (E
2) irrigation condition at genotypic and phenotypic levels indicates that there may be some other secondary components that should not be ignored.