It is believed that the choice of parents is a very crucial step which decides the success or failure of the plant breeding programme. Using the diversity analysis, parents with high diversity can be chosen to generate high magnitude of useful variability. In the present study, 12 quantitative characters were considered for quantifying diversity among 100 blackgram genotypes using Mahalanobis’ generalized distance (D
2).
Analysis of variance
The analysis of variance revealed significant differences among blackgram genotypes for all the characters studied, indicating presence of sufficient genetic variability among genotypes used for assessing the diversity (Table 1). Similar studies were carried out by
Anu et al., (2017) and
Senapati and Misra (2010) in blackgram and identified desirable genotypes for different traits.
Contribution of different characters towards divergence
The relative contribution of each character to the total diversity was different (Table 2). Character days to maturity (66.04%) contributed maximum to the divergence of genotypes followed by reproductive period (15.86 %), days to 50 per cent flowering (9.31 %) and 100-seed weight (4.26%). However, remaining characters had very negligible contributions towards divergence. Plant height, 100-seed weight, days to maturity and reproductive period contributed much for diversity
(Konda et al., 2007); Geetanjali et al., (2015) reported that days to 50 per cent flowering, days to maturity and plant height contributed much for the diversity. While,
Kumar et al., (2018) reported that plant height, days to 50 per cent flowering and single plant yield contributed much for the diversity in blackgram.
Group constellation
The estimates of genetic divergence (D
2) were used to classify genotypes into clusters by Tocher’s method (Table 3). In the present study, the genotypes were grouped into nine clusters indicating the extent of diversity observed was high. The clustering pattern revealed that, cluster II was the largest with 28 genotypes followed by cluster I (26), V (19), III (11), IV (10) and VII (3) and remaining clusters
viz., VI, VIII and IX were solitary clusters. Geographic origin is one of the primary factors which contribute to the level of genetic diversity. The genotypes involved in the present study represented diversified geographic regions of their adaptation. Maximum number of genotypes (28) were grouped in the same cluster even though their area of adaptation was different. The results suggested that the geographic distribution would not exclusively determine cluster compositions which support the earlier observation of
Dasgupta and Das (1991) and
Gantait and Das (2009) in blackgram. The grouping of varieties of different geographic origin in the same cluster could also be expected because of the free exchange of material from one region to another. Another reason attributed for coming together of entries from different geographical regions in the same cluster is unidirectional selection practiced by plant breeders of different locations (Singh and Bains, 1968). Nevertheless, few entries from ARS, Bidar (BDU-11, BDU-12, BDU-18 in cluster VII), few entries from Lam, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh (LBG-465, LBG-645, LBG-757, LBG-685 in cluster II) remained together and entered different clusters, indicating that the geographic distribution continued to play an important role in determining the genetic affinity. Thus, the importance of geographic distribution cannot be over ruled altogether.
Intra-cluster and inter-cluster distances
The intra-cluster and inter-cluster distances are presented in the Table 4. The maximum difference among the genotypes within same cluster was seen in cluster VII as it exhibited maximum intra-cluster D
2 value (47.34) whereas, the minimum intra-cluster distance was observed in cluster I (19.95). The inter-cluster distance ranged from 15.50 to 514.44 and considering the upper limit of the D
2 values, the extent of diversity was high. Similar studies were also carried out in blackgram by
Konda et al., (2007) and
Gantait and Das (2009).
Cluster means
The cluster means generally indicate the characteristic features of the clusters and help in identifying potential clusters for different characters based on the mean values. In the present investigation, the cluster mean values revealed existence of sufficient variation among clusters for all most all traits (Table 5). Cluster VI may be regarded as a good source for earliness as it recorded lowest mean for days to 50 per cent flowering. Plant height is one of the important component traits of yield (
Ram and Singh, 1993 and
Mahto and Mahto 1997) and taller plants are best suited for mechanical harvesting. Cluster VII was regarded as good source for taller plants as it recorded higher mean values. Cluster IV was good source of genotypes having higher mean for reproductive period, an important phenological trait influencing yield through its positive association with main components of yield. Cluster VII was superior with respect to seed yield per plant as well as seed yield (kg/ha) and also recorded high number of clusters, number of pods.