The number of male buffalo calves farms taken under study in Coimbatore, Theni and Kanyakumari districts of Tamil Nadu (Table 2). The male buffalo calves farms were classified into three groups; small (up to 10 animals), medium (11 to 30 animals) and large (above 30 animals) farms. In all the three districts, a total of 60 farms were selected with 14 small (23.34 per cent), 35 medium (58.33 per cent) and 11 large (18.33 per cent) farms. In Coimbatore district, a total of 6 (30.00 per cent) small, 12 (60.00 per cent) medium and 2 large (10.00 per cent) farms; in Theni district, a sum of 3 small (15.00 per cent), 14 medium (70.00 per cent) and 3 large (15.00 per cent) farms; in Kanyakumari district, there were 5 (25.00 per cent), 9 (45.00 per cent) and 6 (30.00 per cent) for small, medium and large farms, respectively.
It was found that net return per farm was Rs. 4,60,188.00 (large), Rs. 1,08,806.60 (medium) and Rs. 23,548.46 (small). Net return per animal in large farm was Rs. 12,871.73, medium farm for Rs. 11,832.60 and small farm for Rs. 7,563.91. The result explains the fact of economies of scale where net return increases with increase in farm size which optimises the utilization of factors of production. Economics of buffalo meat production
(Kamboj et al., 2007) was compared at veal stage (200 kg body weight) and at beef stage (300 kg body weight) under four feeding planes. For this 32 Nili ravi male buffalo calves of an average age group of seven months and an average body weight of 105 kg were randomly allotted to four treatments. The total cost per kg meat produced was Rs. 33.3, 24.6, 25.6 and 21.6 in T1, T2, T3 and T4, respectively at beef stage of rearing. The buffalo meat production was most profitable (net income Rs. 2180 per animal) under feeding plane T4 at beef stage. Under stall feeding conditions it was more profitable to rear male buffaloes up to 300 kg body weight.
To analyze the demographic and farm related personal factors associated with net return per animal in male buffalo calves farming, multiple linear regression analysis was carried out and the results are presented (Table 3). On perusal of the table, it could be noted that the computed F-value of the function was 18.23 and it statistically significant at 1 per cent level (P<0.01), indicating that a definite statistical relationship exists between the dependent variable and the independent variables. The Durbin-Watson test value was 1.99, suggesting that there is no problem of autocorrelation in the data set. The coefficient determination (adjusted R
2) was 0.79 which indicates that all the explanatory variables explained 79 per cent of the variation in male buffalo calves rearing. The independent variables were education, experience, average sale price at marketing, total variable cost, herd size, quantity of concentrate feed consumed, deworming practices, vaccination and wallowing practices and purchase age of calves. Among the ten demographic and farm related variables taken as explanatory (independent) variables, five variables
viz., sale price of animal, total variable cost, herd size, deworming practices and purchase age of animals were found to be significantly associated with net return per animal in male buffalo calves farming and the other variables such as education, experience, quantity of concentrate feed consumed, vaccination and wallowing practices were statistically non-significant. The independent variables
(Islam et al., 2017) observed that such as education and experience had non significant and farm size as significant in determinants of participation in buffalo development programme and attempted to identify the socioeconomic profile of the buffalo keeping farmers and to estimate the income from buffalo farming. Study revealed that the highest per cent of farmers were in age group 31-45 years and engaged in agriculture as primary occupation. The highest number of farmers had primary level education and had above 15 years of experience of rearing buffalo. The highest return from milk production was BDT 27,189 and the BCR was 1.31 (undiscounted). The value of concentrate feed independent variable has non significant in determinants were used in factors affecting production level in buffaloes
(Hussain et al., 2010). Regression analysis in this study is used to test how big an effect of the usage of factors such as sale price of animal, total variable cost, herd size, deworming practices and purchase age of animals on the net return of animal (Fig 1). The histogram graph presents an even distribution pattern, which means that the distribution data is normal because the ratio value is at intervals of -3 to 3. The normal probability plots (Fig 2), which shows that the dots follow and approach the diagonal line from zero and do not extend too far from it. The probability for a residual standard or standard deviation is 0.911, which means positive. Therefore it can be concluded that the regression model meets the normal assumptions or normally distributed data.
The variable of herd size showed positive sign with net return and was found highly significant (1 per cent level). The coefficient of this variable shows that for every one per cent increase in herd size, there will be 88.611 per cent increase in net return. This behaviour of this variable may be due to decrease in expenses attributed to increase in returns. Similarly, the estimated elasticity of coefficient for deworming practices followed reveals that by increasing number of times deworming by one per cent, the value of net return per animal increases by 192.83 per cent (P<0.01). This may be due to reduction in worm load leads to higher body weight gain, basically sale price fix by weight of the animal. This finding is in accordance with his study on managemental practices and mortality pattern of buffalo calves in Tamil Nadu (
Balusami, 2015). The variable of total variable cost illustrated negative sign and was found significant with five per cent level. The coefficient of this variable shows that for every one per cent increase in total variable cost, there will be 0.98 per cent decrease in net return in male buffalo calves rearing. Similarly, the estimated elasticity coefficient for purchase age of calves shows that increasing purchase age by one per cent the value of net return increase 74.22 per cent (P<0.05). This indicates that the higher age group animal having higher weight and also reduction in rearing period also. The variable sale price of animal is significant at 5 per cent level. In the every one per cent increase in selling price leads to 10.06 per cent increase in net return of male buffalo calves rearing. This is the common factor, when increase in selling price leads to increase in net return in farm.