Growth parameters
Growth parameters such as plant height and number of branches per plant were significantly affected by the land configuration and nutrient management. Higher plant height and number of branches/plant was recorded under broad bed (51 cm, 6.5) as compared to flat bed (48 cm, 5.5) and broadcasting seeds and forming ridges (46.7 cm, 3.5) respectively. It might be due to better availability of nutrients to crops in broad bed as evident from the beneficial effects on the crop growth. The results were in conformity with the findings of
Tomar et al., (2016). Among the nutrient management practices, 100% RDF + bio fertilizer (rhizobium + phosphobacteria) produced taller plants and more number of branches /plant (49.9 cm, 6.5) which was significantly higher than the rest of the treatments. Lower plant height (23.5 cm) with minimum number of branches/plant (3.0) was recorded in control plot which was significantly lower than other treatments (Table 1). The overall improvement in the growth and yield of blackgram in broad bed with the addition of both inorganic fertilizers and biofertilizers could attributed to their major role in several physiological and biochemical process,
viz., root development, photosynthesis and biological N fixation process. These findings are supported by
Tomar et al., (2016).
Yield and yield attributes
Grain yield of blackgram varied significantly due to different land configuration and nutrient management methods. Highest grain yield of 1006 kg/ha was recorded under broad bed methodwhich was significantly superior over flat bed (832 kg/ha) and broadcasting seeds and forming ridges (816 kg/ha). The highest grain yield under broad bed was mainly due to higher growth and yield attributes. Similar trend was also recorded in haulm yield in which broad bed (1854 kg/ha) recorded significantly higher over the rest of the treatments flat bed (1751 kg/ha) and broadcasting seeds and forming ridges (1693 kg/ha). Harvest index also followed the same trend, Higher HI of 0.35 was recorded in broad bed and RDF + biofertilizer (0.37) due to higher biological yield (Table 1). The highest grain and haulm yield of blackgram in broad bed is due to favourable soil and moisture conditions, the plant accumulates and translocate of photosynthates from source to the sink more efficiently which in turn increased all the growth and yield attributes. Similar results were also reported by
Jadhav et al., (2008).
Application of 100% RDF + biofertilizers recorded the highest grain (1149 kg/ha) and haulm (1984 kg/ha) yields. This was followed by 100% RDF with a grain (1059 kg/ha) and haulm (1891 kg/ha). The control plot without the application of fertilizers recorded significantly lower yield (445 kg/ha). Similar results was reported by
Singh (2017).
Water use efficiency
Among the land configuration methods broad bed recorded highest WUE of 2.87 kg/ha mm followed by broadcasting seeds and forming ridges (2.33 kg/ha mm) and flat bed (2.08 kg/ha mm). Application of recommended dose of fertilizer along with biofertilizers recorded higher WUE of 3.28 kg/ha mm followed by recommended dose of fertilizers alone (2.87 kg/ha mm). This may be due to higher grain yield and less water consumption. Control plot recorded lowest water use efficiency due to lesser yield.
Economics
Higher cost of cultivation (22500 Rs./ha), gross return (65387 Rs./ha), net return (42887 Rs./ha) and benefit cost ratio (2.91) was recorded under broad bed method. Lower cost of cultivation (18920 Rs./ha), gross return (53014 Rs./ha), net return (34094 Rs./ha) and benefit cost ratio (2.80) was observed in broadcasting seeds and forming ridges. Flat bed method recorded cost of cultivation (21900 Rs./ha), gross return (54048 Rs./ha), net return (32148 Rs./ha) and benefit cost ratio (2.47). Similar result was reported by
Pal et al., (2015). Among the nutrient management, higher cost of cultivation (24000 Rs./ha), gross return (74682 Rs./ha), net return (50682 Rs./ha) and benefit cost ratio (3.11) was recorded under 100% RDF + biofertilizers. The minimum value of cost of cultivation (17200 Rs./ha), gross return (28922 Rs./ha), net return (11722 Rs./ha) and benefit cost ratio (1.68) was recorded under control, which may be attributed to low yield of the crop (Table 2).