Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 41 issue 2 (june 2021) : 324-328

Compatibility of Entomopathogenic Fungi with Neonicotinoids for the Management of Brown Plant Hopper of Rice, Nilaparvata lugens stal. (Delphacidae: Hemiptera)

B. Nagendra Reddy1, V. Jhansi Lakshmi2,*, T. Uma Maheswari3, G.S. Laha4
1Department of Entomology, Cashew Research Station, Dr. YSR Horticultural University, Bapatla-522 101, Andhra Pradesh, India.
2Division of Entomology, Indian Institute of Rice Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500 030, Telangana, India.
3Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, Rajendranagar, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Hyderabad-500 030, Telangana, India.
4Division of Plant Pathology, Indian Institute of Rice Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500 030, Telangana, India.
Cite article:- Reddy Nagendra B., Lakshmi Jhansi V., Maheswari Uma T., Laha G.S. (2021). Compatibility of Entomopathogenic Fungi with Neonicotinoids for the Management of Brown Plant Hopper of Rice, Nilaparvata lugens stal. (Delphacidae: Hemiptera) . Agricultural Science Digest. 41(2): 324-328. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5201.
Background: Rice is the staple food of Indians and it is attacked by more than 100 species of insects. Among all, brown planthopper (BPH), Nilaparvata lugens (Stal) (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) is one of the major sucking insects, which can cause appreciable damage by sucking sap on other hand transmitting viral diseases. Farming community using several insecticides for managing the BPH. However, continuous use of these insecticides causes health hazards and environmental pollution and also leads to development of insecticide resistance. Keeping this view in mind, the present investigation has been planned with combined use of fungal formulations and commonly used neonicotinoid insecticides in rice eco system for managing BPH. 

Methods: This experiment was carried out in two parts, one is studied the compatibility between neonicotinoids (Thiamethoxam 25 SG and Dinotefuran 20 SG) and entomopathogenic fungi (Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae and Lecanicillium lecanii =Verticillium lecanii) by following the standard poison food technique. Second one is after studied the compatibility between neonicotinoids and entomopathogenic fungal agents, inhibitory studies were conducted under glasshouse conditions.

Result: The study revealed that two tested insecticides affected the radial growth of fungi partially at all the three concentrations (0.5RC, RC and 1.5RC). At recommended concentration (RC), dinotefuran 20 SG @0.4 g/l was found to be slightly harmful to all three fungi (20% - 35% reduction of the growth of the fungus) and thiamethoxam 25 SG @ 0.25g/l appeared to be slightly harmful to B. bassiana and M. anisopliae and moderately harmful to L. lecanii (35-50% reduction of the growth of the fungus). Thiamethoxam 25SG alone recorded 65.0% mortality of BPH and when mixed with B. bassiana and M. anisopliae gave 86.25% and 81.25% mortality of BPH respectively under glass house conditions. Similarly, Dinotefuron 20 SG alone could gave 98.75% mortality of BPH. 
Rice is the staple food of Indians and it is cultivated in an area of 43.39 million hectares in India with an annual production of 104.32 million tonnes and with 2.4 tonnes per hectare average yield (MOSPI, 2018). Insect pests are one of the major problems in rice production, wherein more than 100 species of insects attack and damage the crop. Among all, brown planthopper (BPH), Nilaparvatalugens (Stal) (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) is one of the important sucking insects, which can cause appreciable damage by sap sucking and transmitting the viruses such as ragged stunt and grassy stunt (Jena et al., 2006). Due to infestation plants turn yellow and dry up rapidly. At early infestation, round and yellow patches appear, which soon turn brownish due to drying up of the plants which is called as ‘hopper burn’ and could result in yield loss ranging from 10-75% (Park et al., 2008). Insecticides are the major means of managing the BPH. However, continuous use of insecticides causes health hazards and environmental pollution, besides development of insecticide resistance among the populations of BPH (Jhansi Lakshmi et al., 2010). Hence, it is very difficult to manage the insects by insecticides alone, but on the other hand for this for effective management of insects, combined use of chemical pesticides with bio pesticides such as bacteria, fungi and viruses would bring down the incidence of BPH effectively. Keeping this view in mind, the present investigation has been planned with combined use of fungal formulations and commonly used neonicotinoid insecticides like thiamethoxam 25 SG and dinotefuran 20 SG for managing BPH.
Experiment was carried out to evaluate neonicotinoid insecticides and entomopathogenic fungi (Beauveria bassiana, Metarhiziumanisopliae and Lecanicilliumlecanii) both in the laboratory and glasshouse at the Indian Institute of Rice Research, Hyderabad.
 
Inhibitory studies in the laboratory (Poison food technique)
 
Standard poison food technique was followed to assess compatibility of the entomopathogenic fungi with various insecticides (Moorhouse et al., 1992). Desired quantity of insecticides (i.e. thiamethoxam 25 SG and Dinotefuran 20 SG) based on field application rate (recommended concentration, half recommended concentration and 1.5 fold of recommended concentration) were added to the PDA medium (200 ml), subsequently it was autoclaved at 121oC (15 Psi) for 15-20 minutes in the conical flask before solidification (at 48oC) to get desired concentration and later they were mixed thoroughly. The medium was then poured equally into the petriplates. Each treatment was replicated four times. Small disc (5 mm dia.) of young fungal mycelium was cut with sterile cork borer and placed aseptically in the centre of plate containing the poisoned medium. Petri plates were incubated at 27±1oC, 80±5% relative humidity. Suitable check without poison was kept for comparison under the same conditions. Diameter of the fungal colony was measured at 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 days after inoculation (DAI) and compared with standard check. The data were expressed as percentage growth inhibition of fungi by insecticide treated PDA (Hokkanen and Kotiluoto, 1992) and calculated by the following formula
 
  
 
Where
X, Y, Z stand for percentage growth inhibition, radial growth of the fungus in untreated check and radial growth of the fungus in poisoned medium, respectively. The pesticides were further classified in evaluation categories of 1- 4 scoring index. 1 = harmless (<20% reduction), 2 = slightly harmful (20-35% reduction), 3 = moderately harmful (35-50% reduction), 4 = harmful (>50% reduction) in toxicity tests in vitro according to Hassan’s classification scheme (Hassan, 1989).
 
Inhibitory studies under glasshouse conditions 
 
The recommended dose of neonicotinoid insecticides were mixed with the recommended dose of effective fungal commercial formulations (5g/l) and sprayed on to the rice plants. Individuals of BPH were released on the sprayed plants and mortality was recorded at 24 hrs interval up to five days after spraying. The results were compared with those of neonicotinoid insecticides and fungal pathogens alone by recording data on % mortality.
Effect of Thiamethoxam 25 SG on growth of entomopatho- -genic fungi

Thiamethoxam showed moderately harmful effect on entomopathogenic fungi where radial growth of fungi was affected with increase in insecticide concentration (Table 1). In the present finding, thiamethoxam caused 19.19 to 39.15% reduction over control. Among the three fungi, L. lecanii was the most affected recording highest reduction of radial growth (39.15%) at 1.5 RC, 24.87% and 35.45% reduction at 0.5 RC and RC, respectively. According to Hassan’s (1989) classification, thiamethoxam was slightly harmful to L. lecanii at 0.5 RC and moderately harmful to L. lecanii at both RC and 1.5 RC. With regard to M. anisopliae, Thiamethoxamwas slightly harmful at all three doses i.e. 0.5 RC, RC and 1.5 RC have significantly inhibited growth of M. anisopliae to an extent of 23.26 to 34.50% over control. Similar results were found with B. bassiana where significant inhibition of the radial growth was observed recording 19.19, 27.78 and 36.36% reduction over control at 0.5 RC, RC and 1.5 RC, respectively indicating thiamethoxam being harmless at 0.5 RC, slightly harmful at RC and moderately harmful at 1.5 RC. Baraiya (2003) also observed B. bassiana as highly compatible with thiamethoxam (0.005%) and imidacloprid (0.005%) recording less than 25% growth inhibition.
 

Table 1: Effect of thiamethoxam 25 SG on growth of entomopathogenic fungi.


 
Effect of Dinotefuran 20 SG on growth of entomopatho- -genic fungi
 
Mycelial growth of the fungi was inhibited concomitantly with increase in insecticide concentration. The vegetative growth of fungi was nominally affected by dinotefuran recording 17.99% - 34.72% reduction over control. Among the three fungi, M. anisopliae was most affected with 34.72% reduction in growth over control at 1.5 RC. Present findings (Table 2) clearly indicated that dinotefuran was harmless at 0.5 RC (18.87% reduction) and slightly harmful at RC (24.15% reduction) and 1.5 RC (34.72% reduction) to M. anisopliae. Similarly, dinotefuran was found slightly harmful to B. bassiana at all concentrations by recording 26.32, 27.27 and 27.75% reduction in the radial growth of the fungus over control at 0.5 RC, RC and 1.5 RC, respectively. Among three fungi, L. lecanii was least affected by dinotefuran which inhibited the radial growth of fungus up to 22.75% over control even at 1.5 RC. It indicates its safety at 0.5 RC (17.99% reduction) and RC (19.58% reduction) and slightly harmful effect at 1.5 RC (22.75%). This is further confirming the results of Khan et al., (2012) who stated that neonicotinoids (acetameprid, imidacloprid and thiamethoxam) were compatible and safer to B. bassiana and M. anisopliae.
 

Table 2: Effect of dinotefuran 20SG on growth of entomopathogenic fungi.

 
       
The present results indicated that at recommended concentration of dinotefuran 20 SG, it was recorded 27.27% inhibited the growth of B. bassiana and 24.15% inhibited the growth of M. anisopliae and 19.58% inhibited the growth L. lecanii. Thiamethoxam 25 SG was recorded 27.78% inhibited the growth of B. bassiana, 30.23% inhibited the growth of M. anisopliae and 35.45% inhibited the growth of L. lecanii.
 
Effect of thiamethoxam 25 SG + entomopathogenic fungi on BPH
 
Results presented in the Table 3 indicated that thiamethoxam alone could cause 65.00% mortality of BPH under glasshouse conditions. Mortality by thiamethoxam was enhanced when combined with entomopathogenic fungi including B. bassiana, M. anisopliae and L. lecanii. It was clear from the studies that first two days after spraying, there was no significant difference in the mortality of BPH between thiamethoxam alone and thiamethoxam in combination with entomopathogenic fungi. However, from third day on wards, initiation of mycosis occurred and mortality was observed in entomopathogenic fungi combined treatments and later mycosis was increased. At three days after spraying, fungal mycosis was observed in thiamethoxam + entomopathogenic fungi combination treatments i.e. thiamethoxam + B. bassiana recording 76.25% mortality, followed by thiamethoxam + M. anisopliae recording 73.75% that were on par with each other and significantly superior over other treatments i.e. thiamethoxam and thiamethoxam + L. lecanii that have recorded 60.00% mortality. At 4 DAS, the % mortality increased in combination treatments, where thiamethoxam + B. bassiana resulted in maximum % mortality of 83.75%, thiamethoxam + M. anisopliae recorded 78.75% mortality which were on par with each other followed by thiamethoxam + L. lecanii recording 66.25% mortality that remained on par with thiamethoxam + M. anisopliae (78.75%). Thiamethoxam alone has recorded low 61.25% mortality, which was on par with thiamethoxam + L. lecanii. However, the treatments were significantly superior over control. Similar trend was observed at 5 DAS where thiamethoxam + B. bassiana, thiamethoxam + M. anisopliae, thiamethoxam + L. lecaniiand thiamethoxam alone which resulted in 86.25, 81.25, 68.75 and 65.00 % mortality respectively and were significantly superior over control (2.50% mortality), B. bassianawith 8.75% mortality, M. anisopliaewith 10.00% mortality and L. lecanii with 12.50% mortality (Reddy et al., 2017).
 

Table 3: Effect of thiamethoxam 25 SG in combination with entomopathogenic fungi on BPH.


       
The present results indicated that thiamethoxam at recommended dose was slightly harmful with 20-35% reduction in fungal growth (Table 4), when combined with fungi for management of BPH under glasshouse conditions, it could result in additive effect.
 

Table 4: Effect of dinotefuran 20 SG in combination with entomopathogenic fungi on BPH.


 
Effect of dinotefuran 20 SG with entomopathogenic fungi on BPH
 
Dinotefuran is a neonicotinyl insecticide belonging to neonicotinoid group and was evaluated for its efficacy against BPH alone as well as in combination with entomopathogenic fungi under glasshouse conditions. The findings indicated that (Table 4) dinotefuran alone caused complete mortality of BPH at three days after spraying. Dinotefuran was proved safe for entomopathogenic fungi like B. bassiana, M. anisopliae, L. lecanii without affecting growth and sporulation under laboratory conditions (Table 2). Even though complete mortality of BPH was observed with dinotefuran alone, mycosis was observed in combination treatments which means dinotefuran could not adversely affect the growth and sporulation of the fungi. Results indicated that there was no significant difference in mortality among dinotefuran alone and combination with entomopathogenic fungi. At 4 days after spraying and 5 days after spraying there was 98.75% mortality with dinotefuran alone and in combination with entomopathogenic fungi. All these treatments were on par with each other and significantly superior over control which has recorded 11.25% mortality at 5 days after spraying.
       
Present studies revealed that there is no need of mixing of any entomopathogenic fungi with dinotefuran as the insecticide itself could cause maximum (98.75%) mortality of BPH. However, if BPH develop resistance to dinotefuran in future, it can be used in combination with entomopathogenic fungi like L. lecanii, B. bassiana and M. anisopliae.
 
The first author expresses his gratitude to Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India, for providing INSPIRE fellowship. The authors thank the Director, Indian Institute of Rice Research for providing facilities to take up the present investigation.

  1. Baraiya, K.P. (2003). Bio-efficacy of Beauveriabassiana against Helicoverpaarmigera infesting cotton. Ph.D. thesis submitted to Gujarat Agricultural University, S.K. Nager.

  2. Hassan, S.A. (1989). Testing Methodology and the Concept of the IOBC/WPRS Working Group. In: Pesticides and Non-target invertebrates. [Jepson, P.C. (Ed.)]. Intercept, Wimborne, Dorset. Pp. 1-8.

  3. Hokkanen, H.M.T. and Kotiluoto, R. (1992). Bioassay of the side effects of pesticides on Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae: standardized sequential testing procedure. IOBC/WPRS Bull. 11(3):148-151.

  4. Jena, K.K., Jeung, J.U., Lee, J.H., Choi, H.C. and Brar, D.S. (2006). High resolution mapping of a new brown planthopper (BPH) reistance gene, Bph 18 (t) and marker-assisted selection for BPH resistance in rice (Oryza sativa L). Theor. Appl. Genet.112: 288-297.

  5. Jhansi Lakshmi, V., Krishnaiah, N.V., Katti, G.R., Pasalu, I.C and Chirutkar, P.M. (2010). Screening of insecticides for toxicity to rice hoppers and their predators. Oryza. 47(4): 295-301.

  6. Khan, S., Bagwan, N.B., Fatima, S and Iqbal, M.A. (2012). In vitro compatibility of two entomopathogenic fungi with selected insecticides, fungicides and plant growth regulators. Libyan Agriculture Research Center Journal International. 3(1): 36-41.

  7. Moorhouse, E.R., Gillsepie, A.T., Sellers, E.K and Charnley, A.K. (1992). Influence of fungicides and insecticides on the entomogenous fungus,  Metarhiziumanisopliae, a pathogen of the vine weevil, Otiorhynchus sulcatus. Biocontrol Science and Technolnology. 82: 404-407.

  8. MOSPI, (2018). Executive Summary- Agricultural Production, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India.

  9. Park, D.S., Song, M.Y., Park, K., Lee, S.K., Lee, J.H. (2008). Molecular tagging of the Bph 1 locus for resistance to brown plant hopper (Nilaparvata lugens Stal.) through representational divergence analysis. Mol. Genet. Genomics. 280: 163-172.

  10. Reddy, B.N., Lakshmi, V.J., Laha, G.S., Uma Maheswari, T and Katti, G.R. (2017). Efficacy of entomopathogenic fungi against brown plant hopper, Nilaparvata lugens Stal. (Delphacidae: Hemiptea) on rice. The Andhra Agric. J. 64(1): 158-162.

Editorial Board

View all (0)