Study on Residue Management Options in Combine Harvested Rice Field in Relation to Yield and Economic Benefits of Succeeding Rice Crop

DOI: 10.18805/ag.D-5138    | Article Id: D-5138 | Page : 85-88
Citation :- Study on Residue Management Options in Combine Harvested Rice Field in Relation to Yield and Economic Benefits of Succeeding Rice Crop.Agricultural Science Digest.2021.(41):85-88
A. Vijayaprabhakar, S. Nalliah Durairaj, M. Hemalatha, M. Joseph apavijip@gmail.com
Address : Department of Agronomy, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Killikulam-628 252, Tamil Nadu, India.
Submitted Date : 25-01-2020
Accepted Date : 3-09-2020

Abstract

Background: Paddy straw is a good source of plant nutrients. In-situ incorporation of paddy straw affects the growth and development of succeeding rice crop by immobilization of soil available nutrients. To overcome this, paddy straw incorporated with additives and its effect on rice growth and development was studied.
Methods: A field experiment was conducted at Agricultural College and Research Institute, Killikulam during October 2014 to February 2015, to study the residue management options in combine harvested rice and its effect on yield and economic benefits of rice crop. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design and replicated thrice. The treatments comprised rice residue without and with additives (25 kg additional N ha-1 as basal, bio-mineralizer (2 kg t-1 rice residue), cow dung slurry (5%). The additives applied individually, combination of two and combination of all additives. 
Result: Different rice residue management practices exerted significant influence on succeeding rice crop. Increased number of productive tillers (409), number of grains per panicle (162), panicle length (23.8 cm), number of filled grains per panicle (132) and spikelet filled percentage (87) was recorded by T8, where straw incorporated with application of 25 kg additional N ha-1 as  basal + bio-mineralizer (2 kg t-1 of rice residue) + cow dung slurry (5%). The same treatment recorded highest grain yield of 7395 kg ha-1 and straw yield of 8440 kg ha-1 and it reflected as maximum value of ₹ 1,13,646 ha-1 , 69,079 ha-1 and 2.55 of gross return, net return and B:C ratio, respectively.

Keywords

Additives Bio-mineralizer Cow dung slurry Incorporation Rice straw

References

  1. Arshadullah, M., Ali, A., Hyder, S.I. and Khan, A.M. (2012). Effect of wheat residue incorporation along with N starter dose on rice yield and soil health under saline sodic soil. J. Anim. Pl. Sci. 22 (3): 753-757.
  2. Balasubramaniyan, P. (1980). Nitrogen and herbicide management under different planting systems with carbofuran application in low land rice (IET 1444). M. Sc. (Ag.) Thesis. TNAU, Coimbatore.
  3. Chowdhury, M.A.H., Begum, R., Kabir, M.R. and Zakir, H.M. (2002). Plant and animal residue decomposition and transformation of S and P in soil. Pak. J. Bio. Sci. 5 (7): 736-739.
  4. Dhar, D., Datta, A., Basak, N., Paul, N., Badole, S. and Thomas, T. (2014). Residual effect of crop residues on growth, yield attributes and soil properties of wheat under rice-wheat cropping system. Indian J. of Agrl. Res. 48(5): 373-378.
  5. Dobermann, A. and Fairhurst, T.H. (2002). Rice Straw Management. Better Crops International. 16: 7-9.
  6. Donald, C.M. (1962). In search of yield. J. Aust, Agrl. Sci. 238: 171-178.
  7. Fitriatin, B.N., Simarmata, T. and Tienturmuktini, D. (2014). Straw composting with biological agent inoculation and application bio fertilizer to increase rice production with water management system. University of Padjadjaran and Winayamukti, Indonesia. p.7. 
  8. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical procedures for Agricultural Research. II Ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York. pp.381.
  9. Hemalatha, M. (2001). Management of combine harvested paddy straw for rice nutrition with microbial inoculants and potassium levels. Ph.D. Thesis. TNAU, Coimbatore.
  10. Huang, H.L, Zeng, G.M., Tang, L., Yu, H.Y., Xi, H.M., Chen, Z.M. and Huang, G.H. (2008). Effect of biodelignification of rice straw on humification humus quality by Phanerochaetes chrysosporium and Streptomyces badius. Int. Biodeter. Biodeg. 61: 331-336.
  11. Jayadeva, H.M., Nagaraju, R. and Sannathimmappa, H.G. (2010). Microbial inoculants for in-situ decomposition of paddy straw and its influence on soil microbial activity and crop response. Madras Agric. J. 97(10-12): 356-359.
  12. Joshi, E., Gautam, P., Kumar, M. and Lal, B. (2013). Coir Compost: A Source of Plant Nutrient in Organic Farming. Pop. Kheti, 1(4): 142-145.
  13. Manna, M.C. and Ganguly, T.K. (1998). Recycling of organic waste: Its potential turn over and maintenance in soil-A review. Agric. Rev. 19 (2): 86-104.
  14. Martin, J.P., Branson, R.L. and Jarrell, W.M. (1978). Decomposition of organic material used in planting mixes and some effects on soil properties and plant growth. Agrochemica, 22: 248-261.
  15. Mary, B., Recous, S., Darwis, D. and Robin, D. (1996). Interactions between decomposition of plant residues and nitrogen cycling in Soil. Plant and Soil. 181: 71-82.
  16. Nicolardot, B., Recous, S. and Mary, B. (2001). Simulation of C and N mineralization during crop residue decomposition: A    simple dynamic model based on the C:N ratio of the residues. Plant and Soil. 228: 83-103.
  17. Patnaik, S. and Rao, M.Y. (1979). Source of nitrogen for rice production. In: Nitrogen and Rice. IRRI, Los Banos, Philippines. pp. 25-41.
  18. Polthanee, A., Promkhambut, A. and Kaewrahan, S. (2011). Growth and yield of organic rice as affected by rice straw and organic fertilizer. Int. J. Environ. Rural Dev. 2(1): 93-99.
  19. Prasanthkumar, K. and Kannan, S.V. (2018). Rice residue management for rice based cropping system in Cauvery delta zone-A review. Agricultural Reviews. 39(3): 241-245.
  20. Sangakkara, R., Wijesinghe, D. and Attanayake, K.B. (2014). Soil quality and crop yields as affected by microbial inoculants in nature farming. In: Proceedings of the 4th Isofar Scientific Conference. ‘Building Organic Bridges’, at the Organic World Congress, 13-15 Oct., Istanbul, Turkey.
  21. Sharma, M.P. and Bali, S.V. (1998). Effect of rice (O. sativa) residue management in wheat yield and soil properties in rice-wheat (T. aestivum) cropping system. Indian J. Agri. Sci. 68 (10): 695-696.
  22. Singh, S.K., Varma, S.C., and Singh, R.P. (2002). Integrated nutrient management in rice and its residual effect on lentil. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 36(4): 286-289.
  23. Singh, Y., Singh, B. and Timsina, J. (2005). Crop residue management for nutrient cycling and improving soil productivity in rice-base cropping system in the tropics. Advances in Agron. 85: 269-407.
  24. Singh, Y., Singh, B., Khera, T.S. and Khind, C.S. (2009). Crop residue management for improved soil and crop productivity in rice-wheat cropping system in Indo-gangetic plains of India. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India. pp.1-7.
  25. Sridhar, R. (2003). Studies on the effect of combine harvested rice residue and nutrient management on rice. M.Sc. Thesis. TNAU. Coimbatore.
  26. TNAU. (2015). Online source. http://agritech.tnau.ac.in/org
  27. Udayasooriyan, C., Govindasamy, K.N. and Subbiah, P. (1997). Effect of Trichoderma viride, additional nitrogen and farmyard manure on the productivity and sustainability of rice (Oryza sativa) – rice – groundnut (Arachis hypogea) system. Indian J. Agron. 42 (1): 1-4. 
  28. Vijayakumar, D. (1997). Stubble management in lowland transplanted rice. M. Sc. Thesis. TNAU. Coimbatore.

Global Footprints