Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 40 issue 1 (march 2020) : 27-33

COI Gene: A Reliable Tool for Tracing the Phylogeny in Sphingid Moths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae)

Devinder Singh1, Navneet Kaur1,*
1Department of Zoology and Environmental Sciences, Punjabi University, Patiala-147 002, Punjab, India.
Cite article:- Singh Devinder, Kaur Navneet (2020). COI Gene: A Reliable Tool for Tracing the Phylogeny in Sphingid Moths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) . Agricultural Science Digest. 40(1): 27-33. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5021.
In the current study, a partial sequence of 536 bp (approx) of COI gene for seven species belonging to family Sphingidae were analysed. The study was conducted on a collection of moths from northern India, mainly in the states of Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Punjab. The sequences have been added to the database at GenBank NCBI. The analysis showed mean K2P divergence of 0.59% at intraspecific level, 6.3% at interspecific and 12.2% at intergeneric level. The analysis showed a hierarchal increase in K2P mean divergence across different taxonomic levels giving an intraspecific range of 0.0% to 3.6%, interspecific range of 5.8% to 9.3% and intergeneric range of 8.6% to 13.8%.
Extraordinary numerical, morphological and behavioural diversity within insects has made them potent model systems for examining the connection between ecological phenomena and evolutionary history (Dobler and Farrell, 1999; Farrell et al., 2001; Sequeira et al., 2000; Shaw, 1996a, 1996b). The second largest and more diverse order of class Insecta is Lepidoptera (Benton, 1995). Moths and butterflies (Lepidoptera group) were among the last to arrive on the evolutionary scene around 160 million years ago, following the evolution of flowering plants. There are about 25000 known species of butterflies and over 1, 20,000 moths (Kehimkar, 1997). The superfamily Bombycoidea is reperesented by six families namely Saturniidae, Brahmaeidae, Endromidae, Bombycidae, Sphingidae and Lasiocampidae. Sphingidae is an important family of moderately sized to very large moths, which are distributed almost over the whole world. The family is represented by 1450 species globally (Van Nieukerken et al., 2011). The involvement of this family as a study group for evolutionary biology has provided new opportunities to explore the phylogenetic systematics. A partial segment of COI gene known as the barcoding region proved to be a standardised tool for tracing the phylogeny of a group. The DNA sequences comprising about 2300bp derived from the mitochondrial genes COI, COII and tRNA-leucine to elucidate the phylogeny of Hyles was done by Hundsdoerfer et al., (2005).They also gave the whole range of the Hyles euphorbiae complex which revealed that it comprised of six distinct mitochondrial lineages in the Mediterranean region based on sequences of the mitochondrial genes encoding COI, tRNA leucine and COII. In the present study, we analysed a partial 536 bp COI sequence from seven Indian species of family Sphingidae. COI sequences of these species have been added to the existing database. The dataset has been analysed at different hierarchal levels for base composition and sequence divergence.
The specimens were collected from different regions of northern India from June, 2014 to September, 2014; May, 2015 to November, 2015 and June, 2016 to September, 2016. The samples were preserved in ethanol. Specimens were identified using relevant literature and expert guidance of Dr. A.P.S. Kaleka of Department of Zoology and Environmental Sciences, Punjabi University, Patiala. The extraction of DNA was done following Kambhampati and Rai, (1991) with minor modifications. Legs of the freshly killed specimens were used for the extraction purpose. HCO1490 and LCO2198 primers, (Folmer et al., 1994) were used to amplify a region of COI gene. Three way steps were followed to carry out the amplification of the target DNA i.e. denaturation, annealing and extension. The amplification conditions followed were, 1 cycle, 95°C (5 min); 35 cycles, 95°C (1 min), 50°C (1 min), 72°C (90 s); 1cycle, 72°C (7 min). Ethidium bromide stained 1% agarose gel was used to visualize PCR products under UV light. The amplified products were sequenced from Yaazh Genomics, Mumbai. For aligning the sample sequences, the sequences of congeneric species were procured from GenBank submitted by other workers. ClustalW method was used to align all the sequences and divergence at population, species and genus levels was done by using K2P model of base substitution. Phylogenetic analysis was carried out using, Maximum Likelihood (ML, Fig 1) and Neighbour Joining (NJ, Fig 2) approaches in MEGA 7 software (Tamura et al., 2017).
 

fig 1: Maximum likelihood tree based on (K2P). Numbers indicate the percentage of 1000 bootstrap replicate.


 

Fig 2: Neighbour-Joining tree based on (K2P). Numbers indicate the percentage of 1000 bootstrap replicate.

Fifteen COI sequences representing seven species under six different genera belonging to 3 subfamilies namely Sphinginae, Smerinthinae and Macroglossinae were obtained. Sequences were submitted to GenBank database (Table 1).
 

Table 1: List of species whose sequences were generated.


        
No stop codons or frame shifts were detected, indicating that sequences were not pseudogenes (NUMTs). Fourteen sequences of the same number of species under seven genera submitted by other workers were procured directly from GenBank (Table 2). The final aligned data belonged to 29 COI sequences of 536 bp representing 14 species and 7 genera. COI sequence of Spodoptera litura (Fabricius, 1775) belonging to family Noctuidae was taken as outgroup. The alignment showed 378 conserved sites, 158 variable sites and 135 parsimony informative sites. The average A+T content was 71% (Tables 3, 5). The nucleotide composition at three positions of codons was calculated. It was observed that third position showed highest AT content (91% of all nucleotides) followed by first position (62%) and the second (59%). It also showed a strong bias against G with only 0.4% representation at the third position (Table 4).
        

Table 2: List of taxa whose sequences were downloaded from NCBI for alignment.


 

Table 3: Percent base composition of the COI segment studied.


 

Table 4: Percent base composition at the three positions of the codon.


 

Table 5: Base composition of different taxa.


 
The data were analysed for sequence divergence at different taxonomic levels. Intraspecific divergence ranged from 0.0% to 3.6% with an average of 0.48% (S.D. 0.98), interspecific divergence ranged from 5.8% to 9.3% with an average of 7.3% (S.D. 1.04) while intergeneric divergence ranged from 8.6% to 13.8% with  an average of 11.8%  (S.D. 1.57).
        
The samples studied showed distinct barcodes with no case of barcode sharing. During the BLAST search sequences matched with sequences of congeneric species of family Sphingidae from GenBank proving COI marker to be useful for the diagnosis of the family. An average composition of 73.7% showing the typical A+T bias of insect mitochondrial DNA and cytochrome oxidase genes in particular was given by Clary and Wolstenholme (1985). Brown et al., (1994) also showed a bias towards A+T content of 77% nucleotide composition. Similarly, the nucleotide composition bias of 81.79% was given by Cameron and Whiting (2007).
        
Average K2P intraspecific divergence was found to be 0.48%±0.98 with minimum of 0.0% in Agrius convolvuli (Linnaeus, 1758), Clanis deucalion (Walker, 1856) and Theretra nessus (Drury, 1773) to a maximum of 3.6% in Clanis phalaris (Cramer, 1777) (Table 4). The K2P value was 0.6% for Macroglossum corythus Walker, 1856, 0.4% for Cechenena lineosa (Walker, 1856) and Hippotion boerhaviae (Fabricius, 1775) (Table 6).
 

Table 6: Pairwise K2P intraspecific divergence.


        
A mean of 0.73% (SE=0.033) intraspecific divergence in family Geometridae was observed by Hausmann et al., (2011). Rougerie et al.,(2014) gave the intraspecific distance in Australian Sphingids ranging from 0.0% to 2.19% (mean=0.3%, SE=0.007) (Table 9). In the family Gelechiinae the intraspecific distances varied from 0.00% to 2.94% (mean = 0.39%, SE=0.01) as reported by Kekkonen et al., (2015). A similar pattern was observed in the Elachistinae with intraspecific distances ranging from 0.00% to 2.3% (mean=0.28%, SE=0.01). Singh and Kaur (2017) analysed a partial sequence of 580 bp (approx) of COI gene for seven species belonging to family Sphingidae. They reported an average mean of 0.59% (SD of 0.8) at intraspecific level with a range of 0.0% to 2.7%.
 

Table 9: Comparative data of K2P divergence.


        
Average interspecific divergence was found to be 7.3%±1.04 with minimum of 5.8% for Macroglossum corythus (MF882909) and Macroglossum rectans (KJ169150)* pair and maximum of 9.3% for Clanis deucalion (KY962523) and Clanis bilineata (JN677826)* pair (Tables 7, 9). The minimum interspecific divergence of COI for species diagnosis in insects has been suggested to be 3% by Hebert et al., (2003). An average of 16.01% interspecific distance in order Lepidoptera was observed by Hajibabaei et al., (2006). Hausmann et al., (2011) reported mean of 10% with SE of 0.014 in the family Geometridae. Rougerie et al., (2014) observed a range of interspecific distance from 1.1% to 7.2% in family Sphingidae. Singh and Kaur (2017) reported a range of 3.6% to 8.2% of interspecific divergence with a mean of 6.3% (SD of 1.62).
 

Table 7: Pairwise K2P interspecific divergence.


 

Table 8: Pairwise K2P intergeneric divergence.

  
 
All of the studied species showed the interspecific divergence that is quite higher than the suggested threshold value signifying them to be well separated species.
        
In the present study, two specimens of Cechenena lineosa showed the interspecific distance of 8.4% and 8.6% with Cechenena aegrota. The species of genus Clanis showed variation during intra as well as interspecific studies. The studied samples of the species Clanis phalaris gave an intraspecific variation of 3.6%. The interspecific variation between the studied samples of Clanis deucalion (KY962523) and Clanis phalaris (KY962522) was found out to be 6.8% while it was 9.3% between Clanis deucalion (KY962523) and Clanis bilineata (JN677826)* and 7.4% between Clanis phalaris (MF802858) and Clanis bilineata (JN677826)*. This indeed makes them a vital issue to be studied and analysed with different molecular markers including COI as well.
 
In the present study we did the phylogenetic analysis and generated phylogenetic trees. Both the method i.e. distance based and character based methods of phylogenetic analysis were used to generate trees. In both the trees namely Maximum likelihood and Neighbour joining, different genera clustered separately and congeners clustered together. In both the trees Spodoptera litura, a member of family Noctuidae taken as outgroup remained well separated from the studied group.
        
Notonagemia analis scribae, a representative of family Sphingidae grouped together with two within familial species, Sphinx morio and Manduca sexta, with the highest nodal support (BI, 1.0; ML, 100%), forming the Sphingidae monophyletic group as studied by Kim et al., (2016). They analyzed nucleotide sequences of 13 protein coding genes performed on 12 species in three families of Superfamily Bombycoidea, including Notonagemia analis scribae of family Sphingidae.
        
It was observed that both the types of trees showed similar pattern with little variation in the bootstrap value. All the species showed a similar pattern forming single cluster and giving a divergent distance ranging from 5.8% to 9.3%. Bootstrap values were obtained with 1000 replicates. A higher bootstrap value of more than 70% was showed by majority of branches.
 
The present study added to the database of family Sphingidae but it would be inapt to analyse the species on the basis of the available molecular data. It is recommended that more number of species should be considered to trace the trends of evolution followed in the family.
The current study was based on 15 COI sequences of 7 species belonging to 6 genera of family Sphingidae. It represents the first ever study on the barcoding region of family Sphingidae from north India. We have generated distinct barcodes for each species and thus they can be used for the identification purposes as well. The database analysis shows hierarchical increase in K2P mean divergence across different taxonomic levels.
The authors thank the head of the department Dr. Suman Sharma with all the help provided.

  1. Benton, T.G. (1995). Biodiversity and biogeography of Henderson island insects. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 56(1-2): 245-259.

  2. Brown, J.M., Pellmyr, O., Thompson, J.M., Harrison, R.G. (1994). Phylogeny of Greya (Lepidoptera: Prodoxidae), based on nucleotide sequence variation in mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I and II: congruence with morphological data. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 11:128–141.

  3. Cameron, S.L and Whiting, M.F. (2007). The complete mitochondrial genome of the tobacoo hornworm, Manduca sexta (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) and an examination of mitochondrial gene variability within butterflies and moths. Genome. 408:112-123.

  4. Clary, D.O and Wolstenholme, D.R. (1985). The mitochondrial DNA molecule of Drosophila yakuba: Nucleotide sequence, gene organization, and genetic code. Journal of Molecular Evolution. 22:252-271.

  5. Dobler, S and Farrell, B.D. (1999). Host use evolution in Chrysochus milkweed beetles: evidence from behaviour, population genetics and phylogeny. Molecular Evolution. 8:1297-1307.

  6. Farrell, B.D., Sequeira, A.S., O’Meara, B., Normark, B.B., Chung, J., Jordal, B.H. (2001). The evolution of agriculture in beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae and Platypodinae). Evolution. 55:2011-2027. 

  7. Folmer, O., Black, M., Hoeh, W., Lutz, R., Vrijenhoek, R. (1994). DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology. 3:294-299.

  8. Hajibabaei, M., Janzen, D.H., Burns, J.M., Hallwachs, W., Hebert, P.D.N. (2006). DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 103:968-971.

  9. Hausmann, A., Haszprunar, G., Hebert, P.D.N. (2011). DNA Barcoding the Geometrid Fauna of Bavaria (Lepidoptera): Successes, Surprises and Questions. PLoS One. 6(2): e17134. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017134.

  10. Hebert, P.D.N., Cywinska, A., Ball, S.L., deWaard, J.R. (2003). Biological identification through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 270:313-321.

  11. Hundsoerfer, A.K., Kitching, I.J., Wink, M.A. (2005). Molecular phylogeny of the hawkmoth genus Hyles (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae: Macroglossinae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 35:442-458.

  12. Kambhampati, S and Rai, K.S. (1991). Mitochondrial DNA variation within and among populations of the mosquito, Aedes albopictus. Genome. 34:288-292.

  13. Kehimkar, I. (1997). Moths of India: An introduction by NCSTC-    Hornbill Natural History Series. Printed in Mumbai, India by Selprint.

  14. Kekkonen, M., Mutanen, M., Kaila, L., Niemmen, M., Hebert, P.D.N. (2015). Delineating species with DNA Barcodes: A case of taxon dependent method performance in moths. Plos. One. 10(4): e0122481.

  15. Kim, M.J., Kim, J.S., Kim, I. (2016). Complete mitochondrial genome of the hawkmoth Notonagemia analis scribae (Lepidoptera:Sphingidae). Mitochondrial. DNA. 1(1):416-418.

  16. Rougerie, R., Kitching, I.J., Haxaire, J., Miller, S.E., Hausmann, A., Hebert, P.D.N, (2014). Australian Sphingidae – DNA Barcodes Challenge Current Species Boundaries and Distributions. Plos. One. 9(7): e101108.

  17. Sequeira, A.S., Normark, B.B., Farrell, B.D. (2000). Evolutionary assembly of the conifer fauna: Distinguishing ancient from recent associations in bark beetles. Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological Series B. 267:2359-2366.

  18. Shaw, K.L. (1996a). Polygenic inheritance of a behavioral phenotype: Interspecific genetics of song in the Hawaiian cricket genus Laupala. Evolution. 50:256-66.

  19. Shaw, K.L. (1996b). Sequential radiations and patterns of speciation in the Hawaiian cricket genus Laupala inferred from DNA sequences. Evolution. 50:37-255.

  20. Singh, D and Kaur, N. (2017). DNA Barcoding of some Indian species of Hawk Moths based on COI Gene (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae). Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 5(4):35-40.

  21. Tamura, K., Stecher, G., Peterson, D., Filipski, A., Kumar, S. (2018). MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 30:2725-2729.

  22. Van Nieukerken, E.J., Kaila, L., Kitching, I.J., Kristensen, N.P., Lees, D.C., Minet, J. (2011). Order Lepidoptera Linnaeus, 1758. Magnolia Press Auckland. Zootaxa. 3148:212-221.

Editorial Board

View all (0)