Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 40 issue 1 (march 2020) : 53-56

Effect of Micronutrients on Growth and Flowering of Marigold cv. Siracole

Sumita Pradhan1,*, M. Mitra1
1Department of Floriculture, Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Regional Research Station (Hill Zone),UBKV, Kalimpong-734 301, Darjeeling, West Bengal, India.
Cite article:- Pradhan Sumita, Mitra M. (2020). Effect of Micronutrients on Growth and Flowering of Marigold cv. Siracole . Agricultural Science Digest. 40(1): 53-56. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5000.
A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of FeS04, MnS04 and their combination on growth and flowering of Tagetes erecta cv. Siracole. Highest linear growth (68.88cm) of marigold was recorded in plants treated with 0.25%MnS04+ 0.25%FeS04. Plant spread (63.79cm), number of branches (19.10), leaf area (5.36cm.sq.), fresh and dry matter accumulation (431.69g & 105.59g), crop growth rate (7.98 g/m.sq./days), biomass duration (2783.03 g.days), number of flowers per plant (78.66), yield of flowers (35.99 t/ha) and petal meal per kilogram of fresh flowers (390.3 g/kg) and carotene content (2.26mg/g) were recorded highest in plants treated with 0.5 % FeS04+ 0.25 %MnS04 at all stages of crop growth. Plant chlorophyll and iron content were recorded highest with 0.5%FeS04 while manganese content was significantly increased with the application of MnS04@0.5%. 
Marigold (Tagetes erecta L.), belonging to the family Asteraceae is one of the most important commercially grown flower crop in India. It is gaining popularity among the small and marginal farmers of West Bengal due to its easy culture, wide adaptability and short term lucrative return (Ghosh and Pal, 2008). Use of macronutrient balanced with micro fertilizers is of mammoth importance for better performance of the crop in floriculture. Therefore, nowadays use of micronutrients are gradually gaining momentum among the flower growers because of their beneficial nutritional support and at the same time to ensure better harvest and returns. In addition to NPK, micronutrients have a great bearing in influencing the yield attributes and flower production (Khader et al., 1985). This advantage could be due to the fact that micronutrients activate several enzymes and are involved in various physiological activities.
The experiment was undertaken during the whole year from April 2012-June 2014 at the Horticultural Research Station, Mondouri, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Nadia, West Bengal. The details of the treatment combinations were as follows: T0- control, T1- 0.25% FeS04, T2-0.5% FeS04, T3- 0.25% MnS04, T4- 0.5% MnS04, T5-0.25% MnS04+ 0.25 % FeS04, T6-0.25% MnS04+ 0.5% FeS04, T7- 0.5%MnS04 + 0.25% Fe04, T8- 0.5% MnS04 + 0.5% 0.5%.  Eight treatments with different levels of micronutrients were laid out in randomized block design with three replications. All the plots received the recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) 200: 100:100 kg /ha N, P and K respectively. The entire amount of phosphorus (single super phosphate) and half of nitrogen (urea) and half of potassium (muriate of potash) was applied as basal. The remaining half dose of urea and MOP was applied 20 days after planting. A basal dose of well rotten FYM (5kg/m2) was applied at the time of planting. Each plot received three sprays of micronutrient in doses as per the treatment, with the first application made at 30 DAP; thereafter the subsequent sprays were made at 20 days interval.
In the present investigation, plants treated with 0.25% MnS04+ 0.25 % FeS04 (T5) recorded the highest linear growth of marigold cv. Siracole while least elongation of the plant was observed in control during both the years of investigation (Table 1). The application of Fe and Mn at different levels encouraged linear growth significantly, compared to control treatment. The increased plant height with application of micronutrients might be attributed to the role of iron in promoting growth characters, being a component of ferrodoxin, electron transport proteins thus aiding in photosynthesis and better vegetative growth (Basavarajeshwari et al., 2008). Treatment T6 exhibited a significant effect in the number of branches and plant spread in both the years of study (Table 1). Increase in the micronutrient content in leaves might have increased the production of metabolites synthesized and thus the plant had the chance to bear more branches and hence increased canopy spread. Similar trend was found by Elayan (2008) on cotton plants. The foliar spray of micronutrients had a significant influence on the variation in leaf size. The increase in leaf area might be due to the fact that the micronutrients enhance synthesis of carbohydrates in the leaves leading to formation of amino acids, proteins, chlorophyll, alkaloids and amides. These complex compounds are responsible for building up of new tissues and are associated in a number of metabolic processes that favours better development of plants thus increase in leaf area. Highest fresh matter accumulation was noted in treatment T6 (431.69g/plant) which was found to be statistically superior over rest of the treatments and recorded 27.81% higher fresh matter accumulation compared to control (Table 2). Maximum variation in dry weight was recorded between T6 and T0 (30.85 g/plant) while negligible difference was seen between T1 and T7 (0.05g/plant). Micronutrients play a vital role in production of vegetative growth and ultimately encouraged the number of primary branches, secondary branches, leaves and shoots of plants by involving in oxidation-reduction process and photosynthesis process. This in turn leads to increase in fresh weight and ultimately dry weight of the plant. These findings were in close conformity with the findings of Muthumanickam et al., (1999) in gerbera and Sabale et al., (1992) in rose. The fresh and dry matter yields during the experimental period were reduced when Mn concentration was increased from 0.25 % to 0.5 % when applied with FeS04 as foliar spray. This may be due to the effect of increase in manganese that might have brought about a decrease in the soluble iron and an increase in the percentage of insoluble iron in the plant. Furthermore, since the oxidation potential of manganese is higher than that of iron it may exert a preventive action against the reduction of iron by the reducing systems of the plant, as shown by the work of Hopkins (1930). Treatment T6 registered higher values for crop growth rate and biomass duration (Table 2) which may be attributed to increased number of branches, plant spread and leaf area.
 

Table 1: Effect of micronutrients on vegetative parameters of marigold cv. Siracole.


 

Table 2: Effect of micronutrients on growth of marigold cv. Siracole.


        
The micronutrients exhibited a significant influence on the flowering and yield parameters (Table 3). Maximum flower diameter and highest number of flowers per plant in treatment T6 might be attributed to increased vegetative growth and healthy green leaves leading to more production of food materials. Similar results were also recorded by Jadhav et al., (2005) in gerbera.
 

Table 3: Effect of micronutrients on flowering and yield of marigold cv. Siracole.


        
The increase in yield maybe attributed to the micronutrient spray as these nutrients stimulate the metabolic activity by having a stimulating effect on the cell wall loosening, increased cell elongation along with cell enlargement. All these have a positive influence on the leaf area which enhances the photosynthetic area thus causing an increase in carbohydrate level and ultimately higher yield. The results were in close conformity with the findings of Nanjan and Muthuswamy (1975) and Patil (2001) in rose. In terms of petal meal there was substantial volume shrinkage of flowers during normal air drying in all the treatments. However, plants treated with MnS04 0.25% and FeS04 @ 0.5% resulted in 9.78 % increase in petal meal compared to control (no spray). The difference in the petal meal yield per kilogram of fresh flower weight might be related to the flower yield per plant and flower weight. The present results were in conformity with the research findings of Anuradha et al., (1990) and Naik (2003) in marigold.
        
Highest chlorophyll content was recorded in plants treated with 0.5% FeS04 (2.44 mg/g) which was statistically superior over rest of the treatments (Table 4). The increase in chlorophyll content maybe attributed to the application of iron as there is often a good correlation between the level of Fe supply and chlorophyll content (Gauch 1957). Iron + manganese significantly influenced optimum carotene content in marigold cv. Siracole. The high carotene content maybe due to the increased chlorophyll content as Kopsell et al., (2005) has stated that carotenoid content was significantly and positively correlated with chlorophyll content.  
 

Table 4: Effect of micronutrients on carotene, chlorophyll, iron and manganese content of marigold cv. Siracole.


        
Maximum iron concentration was recorded in plants sprayed with 0.5 % FeS04 (277.07 ppm) while minimum iron level was detected in control. Similarly manganese content was highest in plants treated with 0.5% MnS04 (97.18 ppm). This trend might be a result of application of the nutrient which must have exerted a direct influence on its own composition. Similar findings were reported by Bhatt and Srivastava, 2006 in tomato.
Regarding the effect of micronutrients, vegetative, floral and yield parameters of Tagetes erecta cv. Siracole was significantly influenced with foliar spray of FeS04 @ 0.5%+ MnS04 @ 0.25%  in West Bengal conditions.

  1. Anonymous (2019). Horticultural at a Glance. Department of Horticulture, Himachal Pradesh, India.

  2. Aziz MA, Miah M. A. M. (2009). Effect of “Flora” on the growth and yield of wetland Rice. J. Agric. Rural Dev. 7: 9-13. 

  3. Firoz Hussain, S., Sampath Kumar P., Murthy B.N.S., Upreti K.K. Reddy M.L.N., Satisha J. and Laxman R.H., (2017). Use of chemicals to realize the productivity potential in pomegranate through increased flowering and fruiting. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 6(10): 1937-1943. 

  4. Karim MF and Fattah QA (2004). Yield attributes and yield response of chickpea to nitrogen levels and Knap concentrations. Bangladesh J. Life Sci. 16: 147-152. 

  5. Mithila Deb, Roy Sajal, Imamul Huq S. M. (2012). Effects of nitrobenzene on growth of tomato plants and accumulation of Arsenic. Bangladesh J. Sci. Res. 25: 43-52.

  6. Nuruzzamani, M., Islami M.S, Shilpi S., Mehraj H. and Jamal Uddini AFM (2015). Plant growth regulators to improve the growth and berry of strawberry. Int. J. Sustain. Crop Prod. 10(1): 33-39. 

  7. Rathinasamy, Theenachandran (2005). Flowering stimulant composition using nitrobenzene. United States Patent Application 20050266997.

  8. Shyamalee Kohombange, Eeswara J.P. and Rathnasekara Nandun (2019). Effect of nitrobenzene on sweet Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) yield and yield quality under greenhouse condition. International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology. 4(2): 407-410

  9. Westwood M N. (1978). Temperate Zone Pomology. W. H. Freeman Co. San Fransisco, California. 425p. Anuradha, K., Pampapathy, K. and Narayana, N. (1990). Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus on flowering, yield and quality of marigold. Indian J. Hort. 47(3): 353- 357.

  10. Basavarajeshwari, C., Patil, R. M., Hosamani, P. S., Ajjappalavara, B. H., Naik, R. P., Smitha and Ukkund, K. C. (2008). Effect of foliar application of micronutrients on growth and yield components of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) Karnataka J. Agric. Sci. 21(3): 428-430.

  11. Bhatt, L. and Srivastava, B.K., (2006). Effect of foliar application of micronutrients on the nutritional composition of tomato. Indian J. Horti. 63(3): 312-317.

  12. Elayan, S.E.D. (2008). Effect of foliar application of some micronutrients on growth, yield and fiber properties on some Egyptian cotton cultivars. Egypt. J. Appl., Sci., 23(4B): 469 - 485.

  13. Gauch, H.G. (1957). Mineral nutrition of plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol., 8:31-64.

  14. Ghosh, P. and Pal, P. (2008). Performance of Tagetes erecta Linn. cv. ‘Siracole” as influenced by planting time and spacing under West Bengal conditions. Natural Product Radiance. 7(5): 437-443.

  15. Hopkins, E. F. (1930). The necessity and function of manganese in the growth of Chlorella. Science. 72: 609-610.

  16. Jadhav, A.H., Dalal, S.R., Shinde, R.D. and Deshmukh, R.P. (2005). Effect of micronutrients on growth and flower production of Gerbera under polyhouse conditions. Adv. in Plant Sci. 18(2): 755-758.

  17. Khader, M. A., Chezhiyuan, N., Ponnuswami, V., Thamburaj, S. and Rangaswami, P. (1985). Studies on the effect of micronutrients on Crossandra. South Indian Hort. 33:143-144.

  18. Kopsell, D. A., Kopsell, D. E. and Celentano, J. C. (2005). Carotenoid and chlorophyll pigments in sweet basil grown in the field and greenhouse. Hort.Science. 40(5): 1230-1233.

  19. Muthumanickam, D., Rajmani, K. and Jawaharlal, M. (1999). Effect of micronutrients on flower production in Gerbera. J. Orna Hort. 2(2): 131- 132.

  20. Naik, B. (2003). Stability analysis and standardization of production technology for flower and xanthophyll yield in marigold (Tagetes spp.) Ph.D. Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad.

  21. Nanjan, K. and Muthuswamy, S. (1975). Growth and flowering responses of Edward rose. South Indian Hort. 23: 94-99.

  22. Pal, S., Barad, A.V., Singh, A.K., Khadda, B.S. and Kumar, D. (2016). Effect of foliar application of Fe and Zn on growth, flowering and yield of gerbera (Gerbera jamesonii) under protected condition. Indian J .Agri. Sci. 86(3): 394-398.

  23. Patil, N.K. (2001). Effect of plant growth regulators on growth, yield and quality of rose (Rosa damascena L.) cv. “Local Red”. M. Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Gujarat Agricultural University, Sardar Krushinagar, Gujarat (India).

  24. Sabale, A.S., Kewte, M. and Wakade, M.B. (1992). Effect of foliar application of nutrients and growth promoters on growth and flowering of rose cv. “PARADISE”. Indian Rose Annual. 10: 113-119.

Editorial Board

View all (0)