Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 40 issue 3 (september 2020) : 285-289

Optimising Sowing Time and Nutrient Needs of rabi Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] in alfisols of Andhra Pradesh

C. Nagamani, V. Sumathi, G. Prabhakara Reddy
1Department of Agronomy, S.V. Agricultural College, Tirupati-517 502, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Cite article:- Nagamani C., Sumathi V., Reddy Prabhakara G. (2020). Optimising Sowing Time and Nutrient Needs of rabi Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] in alfisols of Andhra Pradesh. Agricultural Science Digest. 40(3): 285-289. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-4867.
A field experiment was conducted on sandy clay loam soils of Tirupati Campus of ANGR Agricultural University, Andhra Pradesh to optimise the sowing time and nutrient needs of rabi pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] for its sustained productivity and profitability. Three sowing times: II FN of September, I FN of October and II FN of October; three nutrient levels (N-P2O5-K2O kg ha-1): 10-40-0, 20-50-10 and 30-60-20 and two foliar treatments: NAA (25 ppm) and DAP (2%) at 60 DAS, 60 and 80 DAS were tested on LRG 41 pigeonpea cultivar in split-split plot design, replicated thrice. Earliest sown pigeonpea (II FN September) resulted in significantly higher seed yield (1700 kg ha-1) and net returns ( 32239) due to improvement in yield attributes like pod bearing branches plant-1, number of pods branch-1, number of seeds pod-1 and test weight. Highest nutrient level (30-60-20 NPK ha-1) produced significantly higher seed yield (1589 kg ha-1) and net returns (28448) due to improvement in yield attributes. Foliar application of NAA (25 ppm) and DAP (2%) applied at 60 and 80 DAS recorded significantly highest seed yield (1434 kg ha-1) and net returns (24111) due to its positive effect on pigeonpea yield attributes. Benefit:cost ratio was significantly high (2.71) due to earliest sowing, highest level of nutrient supply (2.46) and foliar application of NAA (25 ppm) and DAP (2%) applied at 60 and 80 DAS (2.26). Early sowings resulted in significantly higher seed yields at higher levels of nutrient supply. Foliar application of DAP (2%) at 60 and 80 DAS recorded significantly higher pigeonpea yield with early sowings. Early sown pigeonpea resulted in significantly higher seed yield at all levels of nutrient supply and foliar applications. Rabi redgram gave optimum yield and economic returns sown during II FN of September with 30-60-20 kg N, P2O5 and K2O ha-1 along with foliar spray of NAA (25 ppm) and DAP (2 per cent) twice at 60 and 80 DAS.
  1. Dixit, P.M and Elamathi, S. (2007). Effect of foliar application of DAP, micronutrients and NAA on growth and yield of greengram (Vigna radiata L.). Legume Research. 30 (4): 305-307.
  2. Kantwa, S.R., Ahlawat, I.P.S and Gangaiah, B. (2005). Effect of land configuration, post-monsoon irrigation and phosphorus on performance of sole and intercropped pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan). Indian Journal of Agronomy. 50 (4): 278-280.
  3. Laxminarayana, P. (2003). Response of rabi redgram to dates of sowing and row spacings. Annals of Agricultural Research. 24 (1): 187-189.
  4. Meena, B.K., Hulihalli, U.K and Sumeriya, H.K. (2013). Effect of fertility levels and planting geometry on growth and yield of medium duration pigeonpea hybrid ICPH-2671. Crop Research. 46 (1, 2 and 3): 79-83.
  5. Mishra, A., Raj, G., Singh, V.S and Swarnkar, G.B. (2006). Performance of ridge planted pigeonpea varieties under different dates of sowing. Indian Journal of Pulses Research. 19 (2): 257-258.
  6. Padhi, A.K. (1995). Effect of sowing date and planting geometry on yield of redgram genotypes. Indian Journal of Agronomy. 40 (1): 72-76.
  7. Patel, J.R and Patel, Z.G. (1995). Effect of post-monsoon irrigation, rhizobium inoculation and nitrogen on yield and yield attributes of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan). Indian Journal of Agronomy. 40 (2): 220-222.
  8. Ram, H., Singh, G., Shekon, H.S and Khanna, V. (2011). Effect of sowing time on the performance of pigeonpea genotypes. Journal of Food Legumes. 24 (3): 207-210.
  9. Rani, B.P and Reddy, D.R. (2010). Performance of pigeonpea in sole and intercropping system in vertisols of Krishna-    Godavari Zone in Andhra Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 44 (3): 225-228.
  10. Umesh, M.R., Shankar, M.A and Ananda, N. (2013). Yield, nutrient uptake and economics of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) genotypes under nutrient supply levels in dryland alfisols of Karnataka. Indian Journal of Agronomy. 58 (4): 554-559. 

Editorial Board

View all (0)