Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 36 issue 2 (june 2016) : 118-121

Study of green fodder yield potential of pearl millet genotypes under rainfed conditions of Gujarat, India

K.K. Dhedhi*, V.V. Ansodariya1, N.N. Chaudhari, J.S. Sorathiya
1<p>Pearl millet Research Station,&nbsp;Junagadh Agricultural University, Jamnagar-361 006, India.</p>
Cite article:- Dhedhi* K.K., Ansodariya1 V.V., Chaudhari N.N., Sorathiya J.S. (2016). Study of green fodder yield potential of pearl millet genotypesunder rainfed conditions of Gujarat, India . Agricultural Science Digest. 36(2): 118-121. doi: 10.18805/asd.v36i2.10631.

Twenty three fodder pearl millet genotypes including two checks viz., DFMH 30 and PAC 981 were evaluated at Pearl millet Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University (JAU), Jamnagar and Grassland Research Station, JAU, Dhari during kharif 2014. Significant differences were observed among the genotypes for days to 50 % flowering, days to maturity, plant height, dry fodder yield and green fodder yield while differences for plant population and grain yield were non significant. The locations differences were found significant for all the characters studied. The genotypes x locations differences were observed non significant for all the traits except plant population and grain yield. Days to 50 % flowering varied from 52 days (DFMH 30) to 77 days (IP 15564). Days to maturity ranged between 75 days (IP 2761) to 96 days  (IP 14542). IP 22269 (342 cm) was observed the tallest genotype, while, check DFMH 30 (252 cm) was manifested the shortest genotype. Dry fodder yield ranged from 96 q/ha (IP 5153, IP 2761) to 208 q/ha (ICMV 05222). The genotype ICMV 05222 (390 q/ha) produced the highest green fodder yield among all the genotypes followed by IP 6202 (348 q/ha) and IP 15564 (341 q/ha). Hence, these three genotypes viz., ICMV 05222, IP 6202 and IP 15564 may be considered for general cultivation under rainfed conditions of Gujarat. 


  1. Akmal, M., Naeem, M., Nasim, S. and Shakoor, A. (1992). Performance of different pearl millet genotypes under rainfed conditions. J Agri Res, 30: 53-58. 

  2. Appa Rao S. (1999). Genetic resources. In: Pearl Millet Breeding [Khaiwal IS, Rai KN, Andrews DJ and Harinarayana G eds.]. New Delhi, India: Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, 49-81.

  3. Byregowda, M. (1990). Performance of fodder bajra genotypes under rainfed conditions. Current Research University of Agriculture Science, Bangalore, 19: 128-129. 

  4. Chohan, M.S.M., Naeem, M., Khan, A.H. and Kainth, R.A. (2006). Performance of pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum) varieties for green fodder yield. J Agric Res, 44: 23-27.

  5. Khairwal, I.S., Yadav, S.K., Rai, K.N., Upadhyaya, H.D., Kachhawa, D., Nirwan, B., Bhattacharjee, R., Rajpurohit, B.S., Dangaria, C.J. and Srikant (2007). Evaluation and identification of promising pearl millet germplasm for grain and fodder traits. SAT ejournal. 5: 1-6. 

  6. Khan, A.H., Naeem, M., Chohan, S.M. and Kainth R.A. (2004). Fodder yield potential of pearl millet cultivars under irrigated conditions. Int J Agri Biol, 6: 749-750.

  7. Mohammad, D., Hussian, A., Khan, S. and Bhatti, M.B. (1993). Site variation in forage yield, dry matter, crude protein and crude fiber content of pearl millet cultivars. Pakistan J Sci Ind Res, 36: 261-263. 

  8. Mohammad, D., Hussian, A., Khan, S. and Bhatti, M.B. (1994). Forage yield and quality potential pearl millet cultivars under rainfed conditions. J Agric Res, 32: 383-388.

  9. Naeem, M., Nasim, S., Shakoor, A. and Akmal, M. (1991). Performance of pearl millet cultivars under rainfed conditions. J Agric Res, 29: 191-196. 

  10. Naeem, M., Nasim, S. and Shakoor, A. (1993). Performance of new pearl millet varieties under rainfed conditions. J Agric Res, 31: 295-298. 

  11. Naeem, M., Qadir, G., Hussain, M., Nasim, S. and Shakoor, A. (1994).Yield potential of pearl millet cultivars under rainfed conditions of Pakistan. FLCG News letter. 29: 2-3.

  12. Naeem, M., Chohan, M.S.M., Khan, A.H. and Salahuddin, S. (2002). Evaluation of different varieties of pearl millet for green fodder yield potential. Asian J Pl Sci, 1: 326-327. 

  13. Naeem, M., Chohan, M.S.M., Khan, A.H. and Din, S.S. (2003). Study of green fodder yield potential and its components of different pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum) varieties under irrigated conditions of Faisalabad. Asian J Pl Sci, 2: 74-76. 

  14. Rao, S.A., Mengesh, M.H., Sibale, P.K. and Reddy, C.R. (1986). Collection and evaluation of pearl millet germplasm from Malavi. Econ Bot, 40: 27-37. 

  15. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J.H. (1984). Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biometrical Approach, Mc Graw Hill Book Co. Inc., Singapore, pp: 172-178. 

     

Editorial Board

View all (0)