Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 34 issue 2 (june 2014) : 134-136

EFFECT OF NITROGEN LEVELS ON THE INCIDENCE OF STALK BORER (CHILO AURICILIUS DUDGEON )IN SUGARCANE VARIETIES

S.K. Pandey*
1Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Regional Centre, Agarsein Marg, Karnal 132 001, India
Cite article:- Pandey* S.K. (2024). EFFECT OF NITROGEN LEVELS ON THE INCIDENCE OF STALK BORER (CHILO AURICILIUS DUDGEON )IN SUGARCANE VARIETIES. Agricultural Science Digest. 34(2): 134-136. doi: 10.5958/0976-0547.2014.00032.9.
The present investigations were carried out to study the influence of nitrogen levels on the incidence of stalk borer, Chilo auricilius Dudgeon in sugarcane varieties. The infestation of stalk borer increased significantly with the increase in dose of nitrogen. It increased from an average of 16% at 60 kg N/ha to 22.8% at 240 kg N/ha.  The per cent increase in infestation of stalk borer in different sugarcane varieties by 240 kg N over 60 kg N/ha  was found to be 28.6% in BO 131, 28.9% in BO 128, 39.9% in BO 133, 40.4% in CoP 9204, 40.6% in BO 129 and 66.8% in BO 132. At higher level of nitrogen application variety BO128 (19.92%) was found more tolerant to stalk borer.
  1. Agarwal, R.A. (1981). Sugarcane stalk borer, Chilo auricilius Ddgn. Retrospect and prospect. Proceedings of the National Symposium on Stalk borer, Chilo auricilius Ddgn” 20-22, April,1981, H.A.U. Regional Research Station, Karnal, pp 43-51.
  2. Chaudhary, J.P. (1981). Distribution, extent of damage, and control of sugarcane stalk borer, Chilo auricilius Ddgn. Proceedings of the National Symposium on Stalk borer, Chilo auricilius Ddgn” 20-22, April,1981,H.A.U. Regional Research Station, Karnal, pp 7-19.
  3. Chaudhary, J.P. (1990). Cane borers of India and their management. Proceedings of Summer Institute- In Recent Advances in Management of Insect, mite and rodent pests of sugarcane in India . IISR Bulletin, No 30: 47-62.
  4. Gupta (1958). An analysis of the factors underlying heavy incidence of stalk borer, Chilotraea auricilia Ddgn. in sugarcane. Indian Sugar, 8: 209-223
  5. Rajni, V.G. and nath, Paras (1972). Factors affecting the incidence of stalk borer (Chilotraea auricilia) Ddgn. in western districts of U.P. Indian Sugar, 22:91-95.
  6. Singh O.P.,Yadav,S.R. and Madan,Y.P. 1973. Assessment of losses in sugarcane caused by stalk borer, Chilo auricilius Ddgn. and its economic control. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of sugarcane Technologists Association India, New Delhi, 39:31-35
  7. Singh, S.P. and Singh, V.P. (1983). Incidence of stalk borer in sugarcane varieties as influenced by nitrogen level and row spacing. Indian Sugar Crops Journal, 9 (1): 18.
  8. Singh, V.N. (1986). Effect of soil applied chlorinated (Gamma HCH) and organophosphorous (Phorate) insecticides on persistence, microfloral population release of nutrients and sugarcane yield in calcareous soil. Ph.D thesis, Rajendra Agricultural University, Bihar, Pusa (Samastipur) pp.144.

Editorial Board

View all (0)