Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 34 issue 3 (september 2014) : 207 - 210,   Doi: 10.5958/0976-0547.2014.01003.9

SUSCEPTIBILTY OF PROMISING SUGARCANE VARIETIES TO STALK BORER , CHILO AURICILIUS DUDGEON UNDER DIFFERENT LEVELS OF NITROGEN

H
H.S. Randhawa*
1PAU, Regional Research Station, Gurdaspur 143 521, India
Cite article:- Randhawa* H.S. (2025). SUSCEPTIBILTY OF PROMISING SUGARCANE VARIETIES TO STALK BORER , CHILO AURICILIUS DUDGEON UNDER DIFFERENT LEVELS OF NITROGEN . Agricultural Science Digest. 34(3): 207 - 210. doi: 10.5958/0976-0547.2014.01003.9.

ABSTRACT

A study on susceptibility of promising sugarcane varieties to stalk borer , Chilo auricilius Dudgeon with different levels of nitrogen  was conducted at PAU, Regional  Research Station Gurdaspur during the year 2010-11 and 2011-12. The pooled mean of both the years showed that sugarcane variety CoJ 89 significantly had less (24.53%) incidence of stalk as compared to other two varieties i.e.  CoH 119 (29.28%) and CoJ 85 (35.15%). The incidence of stalk borer increased from 3.70 t0 69.63 percent with increase in nitrogen level from 0 to 90 kg N/ac. The highest cane yield was obtained from the CoH 119 variety at 60 kg N/ac.

REFERENCES

  1. Albert A, Thirumalai M , Krishnamurthy M, Ramaya M, Lourdusamy A and Gopinathan M C (2007) Evaluation of tolerance and susceptibility against internode borer of sugarcane varieties. Sugar Tech. 9(4): 308-311
  2. Anonymous (2012) All India Area, Production and Yield of Sugarcane. www.business-standard. Com/india/news/sugarcane- area-poised-to-rise-by-8-10-in-20.http//icargoa.res.in/sugarcane1.htm found on Google.ask.co
  3. Asokan S, Narayana M A and Mahadevaswamy M (2005) Effect of nitrogen levels and row spacing on yield, ccs and nitrogen uptake in different sugarcane varieties. Sugar Tech. 7(2&3):44-47
  4. Atkinson P R and K J Nuss 1989 Associations between host-plant nitrogen and infestations of the sugarcane borer Eldana saccharina Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Bull. Ent. Res. 79: 489-506
  5. Avasthy P N (1983) Insect pest management for sugarcane in India, In Balasubramanium, M and Solayappan, A R (eds) Sugarcane Pest management in India. Tamil Nadu Cooperative Federation, Madras, India, pp. 71-77.
  6. Awad E l, Hag 1, Mohammed A, Abuna 1and Salah A (2006) Response of sugarcane to different levels of nitrogen in four Estates of the Sudanese Sugar Company. http://www.arcsudan. sd/proceeding/40thmeeting/fulltext%20pdf40/ Sugarcane.pdf.
  7. Brokensha M A (1996) Incentive for cane quality. Proc. Afr. Sug Technol Association 70: 291-292.
  8. Dhaliwal G S, Arora R and Dhawan A K 2004. Crop losses due to insect-pests in Indian Agriculture: An update. Ind. J. Ecol. 31 (1): 1-7
  9. King A G (1989) An Assessment of the loss of in sugarcane yield caused by stalk borer, Eldana sachharina, in Swaziland. Proc. Afr. Sug. Technol. Association 63: 197-201.
  10. Mann S, Y P Madan, J C Mahla and D Singh 2002. Role of different sugarcane genotypes in s relation stalk borer, Chilo aurcilius Ddgn incidence under field condition. Ind J Agric Res 36(3): 212-15.
  11. Meyer J H and Keeping M G (2005) The impact of nitrogen and silicon nutrition on the resistance of sugarcane varieties to Eldana saccharina (Lepidoptera : Pyralidae). Proc Afr Sug Technol ASS. 79: 363
  12. Savant N K Kornodorfer G H Datnoff L E and Synder G H (1999) Silicon nutrition and sugarcane production: a review. J. Plant Nutrition 22: 1853-1903
  13. Thakur N S, Kushwaha B B, Sinha N K and Upadhya S N (2009) Effect of plant density and nitrogen levels on growth, yield attributes and yields of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) genotypes. Ind J Dryland Agril. Res. Dev. 24(1): 34-38
Published In
Agricultural Science Digest
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    volume 34 issue 3 (september 2014) : 207 - 210,   Doi: 10.5958/0976-0547.2014.01003.9

    SUSCEPTIBILTY OF PROMISING SUGARCANE VARIETIES TO STALK BORER , CHILO AURICILIUS DUDGEON UNDER DIFFERENT LEVELS OF NITROGEN

    H
    H.S. Randhawa*
    1PAU, Regional Research Station, Gurdaspur 143 521, India
    Cite article:- Randhawa* H.S. (2025). SUSCEPTIBILTY OF PROMISING SUGARCANE VARIETIES TO STALK BORER , CHILO AURICILIUS DUDGEON UNDER DIFFERENT LEVELS OF NITROGEN . Agricultural Science Digest. 34(3): 207 - 210. doi: 10.5958/0976-0547.2014.01003.9.

    ABSTRACT

    A study on susceptibility of promising sugarcane varieties to stalk borer , Chilo auricilius Dudgeon with different levels of nitrogen  was conducted at PAU, Regional  Research Station Gurdaspur during the year 2010-11 and 2011-12. The pooled mean of both the years showed that sugarcane variety CoJ 89 significantly had less (24.53%) incidence of stalk as compared to other two varieties i.e.  CoH 119 (29.28%) and CoJ 85 (35.15%). The incidence of stalk borer increased from 3.70 t0 69.63 percent with increase in nitrogen level from 0 to 90 kg N/ac. The highest cane yield was obtained from the CoH 119 variety at 60 kg N/ac.

    REFERENCES

    1. Albert A, Thirumalai M , Krishnamurthy M, Ramaya M, Lourdusamy A and Gopinathan M C (2007) Evaluation of tolerance and susceptibility against internode borer of sugarcane varieties. Sugar Tech. 9(4): 308-311
    2. Anonymous (2012) All India Area, Production and Yield of Sugarcane. www.business-standard. Com/india/news/sugarcane- area-poised-to-rise-by-8-10-in-20.http//icargoa.res.in/sugarcane1.htm found on Google.ask.co
    3. Asokan S, Narayana M A and Mahadevaswamy M (2005) Effect of nitrogen levels and row spacing on yield, ccs and nitrogen uptake in different sugarcane varieties. Sugar Tech. 7(2&3):44-47
    4. Atkinson P R and K J Nuss 1989 Associations between host-plant nitrogen and infestations of the sugarcane borer Eldana saccharina Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Bull. Ent. Res. 79: 489-506
    5. Avasthy P N (1983) Insect pest management for sugarcane in India, In Balasubramanium, M and Solayappan, A R (eds) Sugarcane Pest management in India. Tamil Nadu Cooperative Federation, Madras, India, pp. 71-77.
    6. Awad E l, Hag 1, Mohammed A, Abuna 1and Salah A (2006) Response of sugarcane to different levels of nitrogen in four Estates of the Sudanese Sugar Company. http://www.arcsudan. sd/proceeding/40thmeeting/fulltext%20pdf40/ Sugarcane.pdf.
    7. Brokensha M A (1996) Incentive for cane quality. Proc. Afr. Sug Technol Association 70: 291-292.
    8. Dhaliwal G S, Arora R and Dhawan A K 2004. Crop losses due to insect-pests in Indian Agriculture: An update. Ind. J. Ecol. 31 (1): 1-7
    9. King A G (1989) An Assessment of the loss of in sugarcane yield caused by stalk borer, Eldana sachharina, in Swaziland. Proc. Afr. Sug. Technol. Association 63: 197-201.
    10. Mann S, Y P Madan, J C Mahla and D Singh 2002. Role of different sugarcane genotypes in s relation stalk borer, Chilo aurcilius Ddgn incidence under field condition. Ind J Agric Res 36(3): 212-15.
    11. Meyer J H and Keeping M G (2005) The impact of nitrogen and silicon nutrition on the resistance of sugarcane varieties to Eldana saccharina (Lepidoptera : Pyralidae). Proc Afr Sug Technol ASS. 79: 363
    12. Savant N K Kornodorfer G H Datnoff L E and Synder G H (1999) Silicon nutrition and sugarcane production: a review. J. Plant Nutrition 22: 1853-1903
    13. Thakur N S, Kushwaha B B, Sinha N K and Upadhya S N (2009) Effect of plant density and nitrogen levels on growth, yield attributes and yields of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) genotypes. Ind J Dryland Agril. Res. Dev. 24(1): 34-38
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Agricultural Science Digest

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)