Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 34 issue 2 (june 2014) : 107-110,   Doi: 10.5958/0976-0547.2014.00025.1

CHANGES IN ENZYME ACTIVITIES DURING VERMICOMPOSTING AND NORMAL COMPOSTING OF VEGETABLE MARKET WASTE

C
Ch.S. Rama Lakshmi*
P
P. Chandrasekhar Rao
T
T. Sreelatha
M
M. Madhavi
G
G. Padmaja
A
A. Sireesha
1Regional Agriculture Research Station Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam-531 001, India
Cite article:- Lakshmi* Rama Ch.S., Rao Chandrasekhar P., Sreelatha T., Madhavi M., Padmaja G., Sireesha A. (2025). CHANGES IN ENZYME ACTIVITIES DURING VERMICOMPOSTING AND NORMAL COMPOSTING OF VEGETABLE MARKET WASTE. Agricultural Science Digest. 34(2): 107-110. doi: 10.5958/0976-0547.2014.00025.1.

ABSTRACT

The present investigation was carried out at changes in enzyme activities during composting which offers a promising solution for assessment of quality of compost. The results revealed that, in both the composting methods the enzyme activity decreased with increasing the composting period. However per cent decrease from initial to a particular period of time was more in vermicomposting than conventional composting and maximum activity was recorded in vermicomposting than conventional composting. The dehydrogenase activity was 79 and 44 mg TPF produced g-1hr-1 at 30 and 60 days of vermicomposting, where as in conventional composting at 30 and 110 days it was 36 to 29 mg TPF produced g-1hr-1. The acid and alkaline phosphatase activity (mg PNP released g-1hr-1) did not significantly changes with incubation in both the composting methods. However more phosphatase activity was recorded in vermicomposting than conventional composting and it was 48 and 26 % increase of acid and alkaline phosphatase activity in vermicomposting than conventional composting. The present study revealed that the vermicomposting of vegetable market waste recorded higher enzyme activities than conventional method of composting and low enzyme activity at maturity compared to initial stages of composting.

REFERENCES

  1. Anina Susan Zachariah and Chhonkar, P.K. (2004) Biochemical properties of compost as influenced by earthworm and feed material. J. Indian Soc Soil Sci. 52(2):155-159.
  2. Anonymous (2010) Satieties at a Glance. Re Statisties at a Glance. (2010). Retrieved from http://agricoop.nic.in/ agristatistics.htm.
  3. Cassida, L.E., Klein, D.A and Santoro, J. (1964). Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Science. 98: 371-376.
  4. Dick, W.A and Tabatai, M.A. (1992) Potential uses of soil enzymes. In: Metting FB Jr. (Ed.), Soil Microbial Ecology: Applications in Agricultural and Environmental Management, Marcel Dekker, New York. 95-127
  5. Haritha Devi, S., Vijayalakshmi, K., Kalpana Jyotsna, Shaheen, S.K., Jyothi, K and Surekha Rani, M. (2009). Comparative assessment in enzyme activities and microbial populations during normal and vermicomposting. Environ Biol 30(6): 1013-1017.
  6. Krishna Murthy, R., Sreenivasan, N and Prakash, S.S. (2010). Chemical and biochemical properties of Parthenium and Chormolaena compost. International Sci Nature. 1(2): 166-171.
  7. Manuel Tejada, Ana Maria Garcia-Martinez and Juan Parrado. 2009. Relationships between biological and chemical parameters on the composting of a municipal solid waste. Bioresource Technol. 100: 4062-4065.
  8. Pancholy, K.S and Rice, E.L. 1973. Soil enzymes in relation to old field succession: Amylase, cellulase, invertase, dehydrogenase and urease. Soil Sci Soc Ameri Proc 37-47.
  9. Pramanik, P., Ghosh, GK., Ghosal, P.K and Banik, P. (2007). Changes in organic –C,N,P and K and enzyme activities in vermicompost of biodegradable organic wastes under liming and microbial inoculants. Bioresource Technol 98: 2485-2494.
  10. Raut, M.P., Prince William, S.P.M., Bhattacharya, J.K., Chakrabarti, T and Devotta, S. (2008). Microbial dynamics and enzyme activities during rapid composting of municipal solid waste-A compost maturity analysis perspective. Bioresource Technol 99: 905-908.
  11. Sankara Rao, V. (1989). Distribution kinetics and some interactions of urease and phosphomonoesterases in soils. Ph.D. Thesis submitted to Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University, Hyderabad.
  12. Shanthi, K., Chandrasekhar Rao, P and Himabindu, V. (2010). Changes in enzymatic activity during vermicomposting of organic wastes. Annal of Biol 26(1): 65-70.
  13. Singh, A.B and Ganguly, T.K. 2005. Quality comparison of conventional compost, vermicompost and chemically enriched compost. J. Indian Soci Soil Sci. 53(3): 352-355.
  14. Susan A Zachariah and Chhonkar, P.K. 2004. Biochemical properties of compost as influenced by earthworm and feed material. J.the Indian Soci of Soil Science. 52:155-159.
  15. Tabatabai, M.A and Bremner, J.M. (1969). Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol Biochemi 1: 301-307.
  16. Tabatabai, M.A and Bremner, J.M. (1972). Assay of urease activity in soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 4: 479-487.
Published In
Agricultural Science Digest
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    volume 34 issue 2 (june 2014) : 107-110,   Doi: 10.5958/0976-0547.2014.00025.1

    CHANGES IN ENZYME ACTIVITIES DURING VERMICOMPOSTING AND NORMAL COMPOSTING OF VEGETABLE MARKET WASTE

    C
    Ch.S. Rama Lakshmi*
    P
    P. Chandrasekhar Rao
    T
    T. Sreelatha
    M
    M. Madhavi
    G
    G. Padmaja
    A
    A. Sireesha
    1Regional Agriculture Research Station Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam-531 001, India
    Cite article:- Lakshmi* Rama Ch.S., Rao Chandrasekhar P., Sreelatha T., Madhavi M., Padmaja G., Sireesha A. (2025). CHANGES IN ENZYME ACTIVITIES DURING VERMICOMPOSTING AND NORMAL COMPOSTING OF VEGETABLE MARKET WASTE. Agricultural Science Digest. 34(2): 107-110. doi: 10.5958/0976-0547.2014.00025.1.

    ABSTRACT

    The present investigation was carried out at changes in enzyme activities during composting which offers a promising solution for assessment of quality of compost. The results revealed that, in both the composting methods the enzyme activity decreased with increasing the composting period. However per cent decrease from initial to a particular period of time was more in vermicomposting than conventional composting and maximum activity was recorded in vermicomposting than conventional composting. The dehydrogenase activity was 79 and 44 mg TPF produced g-1hr-1 at 30 and 60 days of vermicomposting, where as in conventional composting at 30 and 110 days it was 36 to 29 mg TPF produced g-1hr-1. The acid and alkaline phosphatase activity (mg PNP released g-1hr-1) did not significantly changes with incubation in both the composting methods. However more phosphatase activity was recorded in vermicomposting than conventional composting and it was 48 and 26 % increase of acid and alkaline phosphatase activity in vermicomposting than conventional composting. The present study revealed that the vermicomposting of vegetable market waste recorded higher enzyme activities than conventional method of composting and low enzyme activity at maturity compared to initial stages of composting.

    REFERENCES

    1. Anina Susan Zachariah and Chhonkar, P.K. (2004) Biochemical properties of compost as influenced by earthworm and feed material. J. Indian Soc Soil Sci. 52(2):155-159.
    2. Anonymous (2010) Satieties at a Glance. Re Statisties at a Glance. (2010). Retrieved from http://agricoop.nic.in/ agristatistics.htm.
    3. Cassida, L.E., Klein, D.A and Santoro, J. (1964). Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Science. 98: 371-376.
    4. Dick, W.A and Tabatai, M.A. (1992) Potential uses of soil enzymes. In: Metting FB Jr. (Ed.), Soil Microbial Ecology: Applications in Agricultural and Environmental Management, Marcel Dekker, New York. 95-127
    5. Haritha Devi, S., Vijayalakshmi, K., Kalpana Jyotsna, Shaheen, S.K., Jyothi, K and Surekha Rani, M. (2009). Comparative assessment in enzyme activities and microbial populations during normal and vermicomposting. Environ Biol 30(6): 1013-1017.
    6. Krishna Murthy, R., Sreenivasan, N and Prakash, S.S. (2010). Chemical and biochemical properties of Parthenium and Chormolaena compost. International Sci Nature. 1(2): 166-171.
    7. Manuel Tejada, Ana Maria Garcia-Martinez and Juan Parrado. 2009. Relationships between biological and chemical parameters on the composting of a municipal solid waste. Bioresource Technol. 100: 4062-4065.
    8. Pancholy, K.S and Rice, E.L. 1973. Soil enzymes in relation to old field succession: Amylase, cellulase, invertase, dehydrogenase and urease. Soil Sci Soc Ameri Proc 37-47.
    9. Pramanik, P., Ghosh, GK., Ghosal, P.K and Banik, P. (2007). Changes in organic –C,N,P and K and enzyme activities in vermicompost of biodegradable organic wastes under liming and microbial inoculants. Bioresource Technol 98: 2485-2494.
    10. Raut, M.P., Prince William, S.P.M., Bhattacharya, J.K., Chakrabarti, T and Devotta, S. (2008). Microbial dynamics and enzyme activities during rapid composting of municipal solid waste-A compost maturity analysis perspective. Bioresource Technol 99: 905-908.
    11. Sankara Rao, V. (1989). Distribution kinetics and some interactions of urease and phosphomonoesterases in soils. Ph.D. Thesis submitted to Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University, Hyderabad.
    12. Shanthi, K., Chandrasekhar Rao, P and Himabindu, V. (2010). Changes in enzymatic activity during vermicomposting of organic wastes. Annal of Biol 26(1): 65-70.
    13. Singh, A.B and Ganguly, T.K. 2005. Quality comparison of conventional compost, vermicompost and chemically enriched compost. J. Indian Soci Soil Sci. 53(3): 352-355.
    14. Susan A Zachariah and Chhonkar, P.K. 2004. Biochemical properties of compost as influenced by earthworm and feed material. J.the Indian Soci of Soil Science. 52:155-159.
    15. Tabatabai, M.A and Bremner, J.M. (1969). Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol Biochemi 1: 301-307.
    16. Tabatabai, M.A and Bremner, J.M. (1972). Assay of urease activity in soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 4: 479-487.
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Agricultural Science Digest

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)