Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 41 issue 3 (september 2021) : 472-475

Efficacy of Different Formulation of Glyphosate Herbicide on Sorghum Weeds

Dawit Fisseha1,*, Mizan Amare1, Letemariam Desta1, Zerabruk G/medhin1
1Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Tigray Agricultural Research Institute, Humera Agricultural Research Center, Crop Department, P.O. BOX 62, Humera, Tigray, Ethiopia.
Cite article:- Fisseha Dawit, Amare Mizan, Desta Letemariam, G/medhin Zerabruk (2021). Efficacy of Different Formulation of Glyphosate Herbicide on Sorghum Weeds . Agricultural Science Digest. 41(3): 472-475. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-323.
Background: Sorghum is susceptible to weed at its early growth stage. The aim of this efficacy trial was to ensurethat efficacy of chemical Glyphosate-isopropylammonium 41% SL on sorghum weeds control non- selectively before sorghum sowing.

Methods: Thrice experiment was carried out in Humera area in Humera Agricultural Research Center, Semur farm and Desta Berhe farm during rainy growing season of 2019 using sorghum variety i.e. Brhan. Pre and post spray weed count were subjected to efficacy calculation.

Result: New product of herbicide, Glyphosate-isopropylammonium 41% SL (Glpho) at 3.00 lt a.i./ha was shown better performance than the standard check Glymax 48% SL (W/V). Therefore, the new Glpho product could be suggested as an alternative non-selective herbicide before sorghum sowing.
Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] is an important cereal crop belonging to family Poaceae. It is naturally self-pollinated monocotyledon crop with the degree of spontaneous cross-pollination, in some cases, reaching up to 30% depending on panicle type (Poehlman and Sleper, 1995). The annual domesticated sorghums are diploid (2n=2x=20) and tropical origin C4 crop (Dicko et al., 2006). Sorghum is fifth most important cereal crop globally after rice, wheat, barley and maize (FAO, 2012). It has been domesticated since approximately 3000 years B.C. in the Ethiopia region (Ayana and Bekele, 1998). Ethiopia has a wide range of geographical adaptation and the country is a center of diversity for the crop (Tesso et al., 2007). It is produced for its grain, which is used for food, feed and stalks for fodder and building materials in developing countries, while it is used primarily as animal feed and in sugar, syrup and molasses industry (Dahlberg et al., 2011). It is a major food and nutritional security crop to more than 100 million people in Eastern horn of Africa (Gudu et al., 2013) including Ethiopia, providing a principal source of energy (70% starch), proteins, vitamins and minerals (Duodu et al., 2003).
 
Ethiopia is the third largest producer of sorghum in Africa behind Nigeria and Sudan, which contributed about 12% of annual production (Wani et al., 2011) and the second after Sudan in the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA) member countries (USAID, 2010). It is the third most important crop both in sown area (ha) and becoming third primary staple food crop in Ethiopia after teff and maize (CSA, 2015) and second most important crop for injera (common leavened flat bread) making next to teff (Adugna, 2012). Currently, sorghum is produced by 5 million small holders and its production is estimated to be 4.6 million metric tons from nearly 2 million hectares of land giving the national average grain yield of around 2.3 tons per hectare (CSA, 2015). It covers 16% of the total area allocated to grains (cereals, pulses and oil crops) and 14.58% of the area covered by cereals (CSA, 2015). The crop is cultivated in all regions of Ethiopia between 400m and 2500m altitude, mostly at lower altitudes along the country’s Western, South-Western, North Eastern, Northern and Eastern peripheries (EIAR, 2014) and staple food crop on which the lives of millions of poor Ethiopians depend (Adugna, 2007). 44% and 30% yield loss due to weeds in maize and sorghum, respectively (Stroud, 1989). An estimated yield loss about 10% in the less developed countries and 25% in the developing countries is caused by weeds (Akobundu, 1987). Meanwhile, weeds are also the hosts of various crop pests and pathogens (Tao and Hu 2009).
 
Sorghum is susceptible to weed competition at its early stage of growth because the seedlings start weak and frail. Sorghum has also lower water requirement than most weeds. This means that weeds with higher water requirements tend to take up more water per unit of dry mater produced. Weeds interfere with the growth of crop (SPL, 1988).
 
Botanical names of common weeds associated in Sorghum cultivation of the study area are Pennisetum villosum Fresen., Sorghum arundinaceum (Desv.) Stapf, Sida rhombifolia L., Corchorus trilocularis L., Cyanotis sp., Eragrostis pilosa (L.) P. Beauv, Pennisetum pedicellatum Trin, Dinebra retroflexa (Vahl) Panzer, Abutilon figarianum Webb, Rottboellia cochinchinensis (Lour.) Clayton, Aristida adscensionis L., Rhynchosia malacophylla (Spreng.) Eoj., Ipomoea eriocarpa R. Br. and Ipomoea sp. (Unpublished data). These weed have great impact on the sorghum growth and yield. Weeds compete with crops for water, nutrients and light. Being hardy and vigorous in growth habit, they grow faster than crops and consume large amount of water and nutrients, thus causing heavy losses in yields.
       
Chemical weed control plays a major role in increasing the efficiency of modern cropping systems (Combellack et al., 1992). The herbicide glyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl) glycine, is a biocide with a broad spectrum activity that was introduced for weed control in agricultural production fields in 1974 (Benbrook, 2016). Glyphosate is taken up by the foliage of plants and transported throughout the plant resulting in plant death after several days. Glyphosate is formulated with various adjuvants (Li et al., 2005), in particular surfactants such as polyoxyethylene amine (POEA), to enhance the uptake and translocation of the active ingredient in plants. The best known product formulated with POEA is Roundup (Benbrook, 2016). Glyphosate products are used primarily before planting of traditional agricultural crops and after planting of genetically modified glyphosate-resistant crops (Duke and Powles, 2009). Increasingly, they have been used for desiccation as a ‘harvest aid’ on traditional grain crops (Goffnett, et al., 2016; Nelson et al., 2001; Zhang et al., 2017).
       
Commercial glyphosate formulations usually contain a monovalent salt of glyphosate, due to their high water solubility (Baird et al., 1971; Franz, 1985). Glyphosate salts perform a variety of important functions. In particular, the salt portion of the formulated product may allow for greater absorption of glyphosate through its more effective penetration into the leaf (Nordby et al., 2011). However, the salts do not have an impact on the herbicidal activity, since only the parent acid acts at the target site within the plant. When comparing different salt formulations with the same active ingredient, the acid equivalent of the formulation should be taken into consideration (Nordby et al., 2011). Consequently, differences in the theoretical yield of the parent acid of formulated products applied could be observed under these circumstances. In addition, various types and amounts of adjuvant additives, either included in the formulated products or added in the tank mixture, have been found to improve glyphosate performance in different ways. For instance, surfactants, the most commonly used adjuvants, can activate herbicide diffusion across the cuticle by penetrating into the plant cuticle and improving herbicide uptake (Hess and Foy, 2000). It is also worth mentioning that formulations may differ with respect to the quantity of glyphosate that can ultimately be concentrated, due to the different molecular weights of different salts and the various adjuvants that have been used by different manufacturers (Miller et al., 2013). Outcome of research confirms that interaction among glyphosate formulations and leaf surfaces should be taken into consideration, as they may be crucial to the efficacy of the formulations (Travlos and Chachalis, 2010; Travlos and Chachalis, 2013). Concerning formulation of glyphosate products, the responses of various weed species vary among the different formulations. The objectives of this study were to (i) ensure efficacy of candidate chemical Glpho (Glyphosate-isopropylammonium 41% SL) on sorghum weeds non-selectively before sorghum sowing (ii) To verify the product efficacy of non-selective herbicide Glpho (Glyphosate-isopropylammonium 41% SL) in comparison with a standard check Glymax 48% SL (Glyphosate 48% EC).
Herbicide used
 
Glyphosate-isopropylammonium 41% SL (Glpho) applied before Sorghum sowing as foliar spray treatment 3 lt/ha active ingredient using 300 liters of water per hectare and formulation of the chemical Soluble liquid (SL). The agro-chemical manufactured by: Yixing Yizhou Chemical Products Co.
 
Experimental design
 
The experiment was carried out in Humera area on three different farms (Semur Farm, Desta Farm and Humera Agricultural Research Center) during 2019 growing season, each experiment replicated thrice. A Sorghum variety, Brhan, was sown in rows on plots with spacing of 75 cm and 20 cm between rows and plants, respectively. The experiment was contained of in a single block plot size of 75 m2 in each plot were demonstrated. Foliar spray was applied using manually operated knapsack sprayer with one hollow-cone nozzle for three treatments i.e. new product-Glyphosate-isopropylammonium 41% SL at 3.00 lt/ha active ingredient, as standard check herbicide-Glymax 48% SL (W/V) at 3.50 lt/ha active ingredient and untreated check. The application time was before the main crop was planted. The per treatment data were counted by randomly throwing the quadrant on dated 29/10/2011 E.C means one days before the treatment [Glpho and Glymax 48% SL (W/V)] herbicides spray. The post treatment data on weeds were collected 15 days after the treatment’s application by throwing quadrant randomly to the plots. Finally, pre and post spray weed count data were subjected to efficacy calculation using formula of (Fleming and Retnakaran 1985) as below:
 
% Efficacy = [1- (Ta*Cb)/(Tb*Ca)] *100

Where,
Ta= Post-treatment population in treatmen.
Cb= Pre-treatment population in check.
Tb= Pre-treatment population in treatment.
Ca= Post-treatment population in check.
Data subject to excel analysis.                                                  
The treatments received only one spray before sorghum crop sowing. Efficacy of the candidate herbicide Glpho (Glyphosate-isopropylammonium 41% SL) was showed an excellent performance in controlling weeds before sowing a Sorghum crop as a non-selective weed control. The candidate Glpho efficacy showed a higher percentage than the check Glymax 48% SL (W/V) efficacy were recorded 93.50% and 82.0% respectively (Table 1 and Fig 1).
 

Fig 1: The candidate glyphosate non-selective herbicide glpho efficacy verification % on weed control in sorghum crop across the standard check and untreated Bar chart.


 

Table 1: Mean Efficacy of glyphosate 41% SL on weed before sorghum sowing 2019.


 
In general, Glyphosate-isopropylammonium 41% SL showed excellent performance in controlling weed as Table 1. The differences in absorption and translocation of the herbicide are responsible for the fluctuation in glyphosate efficacy and the variations in glyphosate tolerance among weed species (D’Anieriet_al1990). Concerning formulation of glyphosate products, the responses of various weed species vary among the different formulations (Ilias et al., 2017). The increased efficacy of Glyphosate-isopropylammonium 41% SL versus Glyphosate 48% EC on Sorghum weeds may be due to the greater rate of absorption and subsequent translocation of Glyphosate-isopropylammonium 41% SL.
The new product of herbicide, Glpho, shown better performance than the standard check Glymax 48% SL (W/V). Therefore, the new Glpho herbicide product could be suggested as an alternative non-selective herbicide to destroy the weeds in sorghum before sowing. However, further research needs to be done to determine the actual mechanism of Glpho for increasing efficacy.

  1. Adugna, A. (2007). The Role of Introduced Sorghum and Millet in Ethiopian Agriculture, Melkassa Agricultural Research Center, Nazareth, Ethiopia. SAT Journal e journal. icrisat. org. 3(1).

  2. Adugna, A. (2012). Population genetics and ecological studies in wild sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.)] in Ethiopia: Implications for germplasm conservation, PhD Thesis. Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. P5.

  3. Akobundu, I.O. (1987). Weed Science in the Tropics, Principles and Practices. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester. 522 pp.19.

  4. Ayana, A. and Bekele, E. (1998). Geographical patterns of morphological variation in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] germplasm from Ethiopia and Eritrea: Qualitative characters. Hereditas. 129: 195-205.

  5. Baird, D., Upchurch, R., Homesley, W. and Franz, J. (1971). Introduction of a new broadspectrum postemergence herbicide class with utility for herbaceous perennial weed control. In Proceedings of the 26th North Cental Weed Control    Conference, Kansas City, MO, USA, 7-9 December; pp. 64-68.

  6. Benbrook, C.M. (2016). Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United States and globally. Environ. Sci. Eur. 28 (3). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-016-0070-0.

  7. Combellack, J.H., McShane, A. and Richardson, R.G. (1992). The influence of adjuvants on the performance of a glyphosate-2,4-D mixture, in Adjuvants for agrichemicals, ed by Foy CL, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 303-310.

  8. CSA (Central Statistics Agency for Ethiopia) (2014/2015). Agricultural sample survey of area and production of major crops. (1): 10-14.

  9. D’Anieri, P., Zedaker, S.M., Seiler, J.R. and Kreh, R.E. (1990). Glyphosate translocation and efficacy relationships in red maple, sweetgum and loblolly pine seedlings. For. Sci. 36: 438-447.

  10. Dahlberg, J., Berenji, J., Sikora, V. and Latkoviæ, D. (2011). Assessing sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] germplasm for new traits: food, fuels and unique uses. Maydica. 56: 85-92.

  11. Dicko, M.H., Gruppen, H., Traore, A.G.Y., Voragen, W.J. and Berkel, H. (2006). Sorghum grain ashuman food in Africa: relevance of content of starch and amylase activities. African Journal of Biotechnology. 5(5): 384-395.

  12. Duke, S.O. and Powles, S.B. (2009). Glyphosate-resistant crops and weeds: Now and in the future. AgBioforum 12: 346-357. 

  13. Duodu, K.G., Taylor, J.R., Belton, P.S. and Hamaker, B.R. (2003). Factors affecting sorghum protein digestibility. Journal of Cera Science. 38(2): 117-131. DOI: 10.1016/S0733-5210(03)00016-X.

  14. Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR) (2014). Ethiopian Strategy for Sorghum 2014-2024. Pp 1-10.

  15. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). (2012). Database of Agricultural Production. FAO Statistical Databases (FAOSTAT). 2012. http://faostat.fao.org/default.aspx.

  16. Fleming, R. and Retnakaran, A. (1985). Evaluating Single treatment Data using Abbot´s formula with modification. J. Econ. Entomol. 78: 1179-1181.

  17. Franz, J.E. (1985). Discovery, development and chemistry of glyphosate. In Herbicide Glyphosate, [Grossbard, E., Atkinson, D., (Eds.)]. Butterworth and Co. Ltd.: Toronto, ON, USA.

  18. Goffnett, A.M., Sprague, C.L., Mendoza, F. and Cichy, K.A. (2016). Preharvest herbicide treatments affect black bean desiccation, yield and canned bean color. Crop Sci. 56: 1962-1969.

  19. Gudu, S., Ouma, E.O., Onkware, A.O., Too, E.J., Were, B.A., Ochuodho, J.O. Othieno, C.O., Okalebo, J.R. and Agalo, J. (2013). Preliminary Participatory On-farm Sorghum Variety Selection for Tolerance to drought, Soil Acidity and Striga in Western Kenya. Maina Moi University, Kenya First Bio-Innovate. Regional Scientific Conference United Nations Conference Centre (UNCC-ECA) Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

  20. Hess, F.D. and Foy, C.L. (2000). Interaction of surfactants with plant cuticles. Weed Technol. 14: 807-813.

  21. Ilias, T., Nikolina, C. and Dimitrios, B. (2017). Glyphosate efficacy of different salt formulations and adjuvant additives on various weeds. Agronomy. 7(3): 60.

  22. Li, J. Smeda, R.J., Sellers, B.A. and Johnson, W.G. (2005). Influence of formulation and glyphosate salt on absorption and translocation in three annual weeds. Weed Sci. 53: 153-159.

  23. Miller, T., Hanson, B., Peachey, E., Boydston, R.,Al-Khatib, K. (2013). Glyphosate Stewardship: Keeping an Effective Herbicide Effective; University of California: Davis, CA, USA, 2013.

  24. Nelson, K.A., Massey, R.E. and Burdick, B.A. (2001). Harvest aid application timing affects wheat and relay intercropped soybean yield. Agron. J. 103: 851-855.

  25. Nordby, D.E. and Hager, A.G. (2011). Herbicide Formulations and Calculations: Active Ingredient or Acid Equivalent, a Weed Fact Sheet. In Integrated Pest Management Handbook; University of Illinois: Champaign, IL, USA, 2011.

  26. Poehlman, J.M. and Sleper, D.A. (1995). Breeding Field Crops. 4th ed, Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa. 494p.

  27. SPL (Scientific Phyto-pathological Laboratory) (1987/88). Progress report for 1987/88. Ambo, Ethiopia. 198821.

  28. Stroud, A. (1989). Weed Management in Ethiopia: An Extension and Training Manual. FAO, Rome.

  29. Tao, B. and Hu, F. (2009). In The practical Technology of Weed Chemical Control. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press. 3-18p.

  30. Tesso, T., Gutema, Z., Deressa, A. and Ejeta, G. (2007). An Integrated Striga Management Option Offers Effective Control of Striga in Ethiopia. In Integrating New Technologies for Striga control: Towards Ending the Witch-Hunt. (pp. 199-212).

  31. Travlos, I.S. and Chachalis, D. (2010). Glyphosate-resistant hairy fleabane (Conyza bonariensis) is reported in Greece. Weed Technol. 24: 569-573.

  32. Travlos, I.S. and Chachalis, D. (2013). Relative competitiveness of glyphosate-resistant and glyphosate-susceptible populations of hairy fleabane, Conyza bonariensis. J. Pest Sci. 86: 345-351.

  33. USAID (United State Agency for International Development) (2010). Staple Food Value Chain Analysis. Country Report, Ethiopia.

  34. Wani, S.P., Albrizio, R. and Vaija, N.R. (2011). Sorghum: Crop Yield Response to Water. FAO, Rome Italy. P32.

  35. Zhang, T., Johnson, E.N., Mueller, T.C. and Willenborg, C.J. (2017). Early application of harvest aid herbicides adversely impacts lentil. Agron. J. 109: 239-248.

Editorial Board

View all (0)