Haplogroup classification and phylogenetic analysis
The mtDNA control region HVI sequences from all the 93 samples were found to be highly polymorphic with 102 variable sites across the 625 bp of the alignment. Out of the total variable sites, 100 variants were transitions and only 2 variants were transversions. There were no insertions/deletions observed.
Sixty-six different haplotypes were identified out of the 93 mtDNA HVI region sequences revealing high haplotype diversity. Three haplotypes were found to be shared between breeds: one between Khari Bandipur and Khari Salyan and two between Khari Bandipur and Sinhal. Individuals of different breeds from different geographical regions such as Khari Bandipur and Sinhal also share haplotypes. This median joining network depicts clearly that breeds from different geographic regions did not cluster together and then separated from other regions. This result indicates that there is no correspondence between the geographic regions of origin and relationships among breeds.
Four haplogroups (A, B, C and D) were identified, when the
NJ tree of 93 mtDNA HVI region sequences together with the 22 reference sequences belonging to the known six mitochondrial haplogroups
(Naderi et al., 2007) (Fig 3) was constructed. Among them, haplogroups A was the predominant (74%) group followed by B (20%), both of which were present across all six goat populations (Table 2). There was no specific haplogroup distribution pattern in breeds/populations or among the different ecological regions (Table 1 and Fig 2). Only one breed (Chyangra goat) contained all four haplogroups (A-D). Khari Bandipur goats (NGKB) contained haplogroups A, B and D. Other breeds/populations contained only two haplogroups (A and B). When the ecological distribution was considered, high hill regions contained all the four haplogroups, mid hill regions contained three haplogroups (A, B and D) and lowlands contained only two haplogroups (A and B). Specifically for haplogroup B, all the breeds had sub-haplogroup B1except for Chyangra (one individual), which had sub-haplogroup B2 (Table 1). Haplogroups B2, D and C showed southward gene flow from Northwestern China down to alpine region and hills of Nepal and never reached to the lowlands, whereas B1 is found in all over the country except to the alpine region.
The
NJ tree drawn against wild goat populations revealed that none of breeds were close to any of the existing wild goat populations.
Genetic diversity
Number of haplotypes found in each breed/ population ranged from 6 to 17 depending on the difference in number of samples and the diversity ranging from 0.86 to 0.99. Both indices revealed a relatively low mtDNA variation in Khari Ilam (NGKI) and Sinhal (NGS) while Chyangra (NGCh) goats were highly diversified. The genetic variations were found to be distributed at 92.43% and 7.54% within breeds and among breeds, respectively as per AMOVA. According to the ecological distribution, the samples from the high hill area had the highest haplotype diversity (0.98±0.02) and nucleotide diversity (0.04±0.01).
Genetic diversity for the four haplogroups were also estimated (Table 2). Among them, haplogroups A had the highest and haplogroup D had the lowest nucleotide diversity. As haplogroup C had only two individuals and belonged to the same haplotype, diversity could not be calculated for this group.
Phylogeographic analysis/ Origin of Nepalese goat
It was seen that both Khari Salyan and Terai goat sequences shared with Indian goats, while Khari Salyan shared with Pakistani and Chinese goats, indicating same origin or gene flow between goat populations (Table 3).
As we found the strong gene flow among different breeds of neighboring countries and considered China as the origin of Haplogroup B
(Liu et al., 2006), we further presented
MJ network to locate an interesting route of gene flow in the region (Fig 5). The network contained two sub-clades with star-like phylogeny, in which two high frequency haplotypes H_6 (78 individuals, 38.6% of the total B) and H_19 (28 individuals, 13.86% of the total B) were located in the center. In between H_6 and H_19, H_21 (11 individuals) with one mutation difference from H_19, was shared with one individual from Mongolia and with 10 individuals from China. In addition, one Nepalese goat was only one mutation away from H_21. The haplotype H_19 was shared with individuals only from China whereas haplotype H_6 was shared among individuals from China (65 individuals), Laos (2 individuals), Malaysia (6 individuals), Pakistan (1 individual), India (3 individuals) and Nepal (1 individual). Along with haplotype H_38, there could be four different domestication events in Asian population HapG B.
Furthermore, graphical distribution of haplogroups showed maximum gene flow under haplogroups level in goats among different Asian countries (Fig 6). The green arrow shows that sub-haplogroup B2 found in the Tibetan goats influenced Chyangra goat, found in the alpine region and did not cross the boundary of Himalayas; whereas in case of sub-haplogroup B1, gene flow (maroon arrow) revealed the southward and south-west direction from Southern China, a speculated domestication centre for HapG B, down under the trans-himalayan region to Nepal.
mtDNA sequences of the studied samples showed notable haplotypes diversity: sixty-six haplotypes were identified in the studied samples. The wide variability might have been due to the multiple maternal origin of the population, as reported by other researchers
(Liu et al., 2006) studying on other goat populations. The result is corroborated by the
NJ tree drawn against wild goat species which revealed that none of the Nepalese breeds are close to any of the expected wild ancestors. Multiple maternal origins in goats might be due to their unique adaptation characteristics in new environment which in turn cause gene flow easily among different populations of goats
(When et al., 2004). Some of these haplotypes were shared by individuals of different breeds from completely different geographical regions suggesting that there is no association between the geographical regions of origin and the breeds. The low genetic variation appeared among the breeds/ population (7.54%) and the high rate of genetic variation within breeds/populations (92.43%) also reinforced the above statement. Furthermore, this view is supported by the network profile which showed that populations from different geographic regions in Nepal are intermixed.
In the studied samples, neither haplogroup specific distribution pattern in breeds/populations nor among the different ecological regions was observed. However, the overall frequency distribution of the four haplogroups in all the Nepalese goat breeds studied was consistent with the world scenario reported in previous studies
(Naderi et al., 2007), in which haplogroups A (74.14%, 69/93) and B (20.41%, 19/93) were the main components of the Nepalese goats. Even though the haplogroup A is the largest group, it does not indicate any clear geographic pattern in the network profile which is complicated by the abundance of sequence homoplasmy and is consistent with the low bootstrap support in the phylogenetic tree.
While taking into account only haplogroup B, as the Eastern Asia is claimed to be centre of emergence of the Asian goat
(Wu et al., 2009), a
MJ network with the regional goat mtDNA sequences illustrates an interesting route of gene flow and shows at least two different origins for development of Nepalese breeds. On one hand, it shows that China from the northern border might be the origin at least for Chyangra goat in alpine region while on the other, the southern Nepalese goat (Khari from mid hills and Terai from lowland) shared haplotypes with Indian, Bhutan and Pakistan goat breeds. These results suggest a strong gene flow among goat populations promoted by the traditional seasonal pastoralism, annual long distance migrations and the ancient trade between Tibet and India via Nepal accounts for the pattern discerned in the regional goat gene pool. This prospective is again reinforced by the molecular evidence of some indigenous people of Nepal who show genetic relationship with Tibet and also have the common ancestry for the Tibeto-Burman language
(Gayden et al., 2009).
Sinhal goat, which does not share with any of Nepalese and regional goats, might be different from other indigenous breeds and considered as native for Nepal. However, the finding of AMOVA reflects low differentiation in the maternal lineage among the different breeds. Interestingly, beside other haplogroups, haplogroup D is found to be trait-specific as this haplogroup is observed in all the hairy goats from Pakistan, Nepal, Tibet, Xinjiang, Liaoning and Inner Mongolia irrespective of geographically distant.
All the above evidences and the results of the current study support that the genetic diversity and structure in mtDNA genome among indigenous Nepalese goats were shaped not only by the intensive and continuous gene flow among the goats distributed in middle and lowland in Nepal and geographical vicinity in India but also by the exchanges between goats found in high hill of Nepal (
e.g. the B2 haplotype present in Chyangra goats) and Tibetan goats in China.