Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Agricultural Science Digest, volume 41 issue 4 (december 2021) : 542-547

Farm Level Cost-benefit Analysis: The Evaluation of Economics of Conservation Agriculture in Bergville Town in Kwa-zulu Natal Province of South Africa

Sanelise Tafa, Olusegun J. Ijila, Ajuruchukwu Obi, Godwin I. Nebo
1Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice, South Africa.
Cite article:- Tafa Sanelise, Ijila J. Olusegun, Obi Ajuruchukwu, Nebo I. Godwin (2021). Farm Level Cost-benefit Analysis: The Evaluation of Economics of Conservation Agriculture in Bergville Town in Kwa-zulu Natal Province of South Africa. Agricultural Science Digest. 41(4): 542-547. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-282.

ABSTRACT

Background: Practicing the unsustainable system of farming contributes in no small way to soil deterioration which in turn affects agricultural productivity. Even though one of the important requirements for embracing any agrarian practice is the financial viability of the process, it is believed that the differences in the benefits obtained from both conventional farming and conservation agriculture are not well articulated. While general inference can be made, it is also important to make a thorough evaluation of the benefits that can be derived from conservation agriculture and conventional agriculture.
Methods: The study was conducted in Okhahlamba Local Municipality, which is situated in-between Lesotho, Free State Province, Alfred Duma and the Inkosi Langalibalele Local Municipality. Secondary data were retrieved from the Mahlathini Organics dataset collected from three different seasons, such as 2012/2013 to 2014/2015 and 2016/2017 seasons. The farmers under study practiced conservation agriculture (0.8ha) and conventional agriculture (0.8ha). 
Result: Using Gross Margin in addition to indicators like Benefit-Cost Ratio, Internal Rate of Returns and Net Present Value, this research identified that the advantages of using the conservation system of farming are enormous when matched with conventional agriculture. Consequently, this research suggests the advancement and encouragement of conservation agriculture as it provides more incentives in the long run.

REFERENCES

  1. Agricultural Research Council (ARC). (2014). Assessing the impact of conservation agriculture practices on wheat production in the Western Cape. Economic and Biometrical Service, (March), 1-40.
  2. Barney, M. and Mthembu, J. (2012). Rural tourism development: a viable formula for poverty alleviation in Bergville. 4(1): 63-74.
  3. Du Toit, G. (2007). The Bureau for Food and Agricultural Policy (BFAP). Policy Report, 4.
  4. Friedrich, T., Derpsch, R. and Kassam, A. (2012). Overview of the global spread of conservation agriculture. Field Actions Science Reports. 6(6): 1-7. 
  5. Kruger, E. (2014). Attachment 2: Annual Report Ca Farmer Innovation Programme (CA-FIP) for. Mahlathini Organics, (October 2013): 2003-2015. 
  6. Kruger, E. (2016). Annual Report Ca Farmer Innovation Programme (CA-FIP) for. Mahlathini Organics.
  7. Lai, C., Chan, C., Halbrendt, J., Shariq, L., Roul, P., Idol, T., et al. (2012). Comparative economic and gender, labor analysis of conservation agriculture practices in tribal villages in india. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review. 15(1): 73-86.
  8. Mullins, W., Cloete, R. and Matthee, M. (2012). Ncwabeni off-channel STORAGE DAM/ : Economic Feasibility. P WMA 11/T52/00/3211/3.
  9. Ngwira, A., Johnsen, F.H., Aune, J.B., Mekuria, M. and Thierfelder, C. (2014). Adoption and extent of conservation agriculture practices among smallholder farmers in Malawi. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 69(2): 107-119. 
  10. Ogunlade, A.A. (2008). Comparative cost-benefit analysis of renewable energy resources for rural community development in Nigeria (Doctoral dissertation, North-West University).
  11. Pannell, D.J., Llewellyn, R.S. and Corbeels, M. (2014). The farm-level economics of conservation agriculture forresource-poor farmers. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 187: 52-64.
  12. Sihlobo, W. (2016). An evaluation of competitiveness of South African maize exports (Doctoral dissertation, Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University).
  13. Stronkhorst, L., Mapumulo, C., Trytsman, G., Breytenbach, F., Lötter, L., Mpanza, T. (2010). Report: Local Level Land Degradation Assessment on commercial farms in Winterton, Kwa-Zulu Natal Province. Agricultural Research Council-Institute for Soil, Climate and Water.
  14. Uri, N.D. (2000). An evaluation of the economic benefits and costs of conservation tillage. Environmental Geology. 39(3-4): 238-248. 
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)