Evaluation of Desi Type Chickpea (Cicer artinum L.) Genotypes for Yield and Yield Components in Eastern Amhara, Ethiopia

DOI: 10.18805/ag.D-275    | Article Id: D-275 | Page : 8-13
Citation :- Evaluation of Desi Type Chickpea (Cicer artinum L.) Genotypes for Yield and Yield Components in Eastern Amhara, Ethiopia.Agricultural Science Digest.2022.(42):8-13
Awol Mohammed, Mengstu Tefera, Yirga Kindie, Sisay Bisetegn, Eshete Wudu, Fentaw Asres, Seyoum Assefie, Wondesen Dagnachew, Ambachew Tefera mawol50@yahoo.com
Address : Highland Pulse Crop researcher at Srinka Agricultural Research Center, P. O. Box 74, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Submitted Date : 4-05-2020
Accepted Date : 14-05-2021


Background: Chickpea is the second most important legumes next to faba bean in Ethiopia. The productivity of chickpea in the country is below 2 t/ha but its yield potential reaches 5-6 t/ha. The major reasons attributed to non-availability of widely adaptable and high yielding varieties. Therefore; the objective of this experiment was to identify and recommend a widely adaptable and high yielding variety. 
Methods: Forty genotypes with checks were evaluated in RCB design with three replications at four locations for two years. Phenological and Agronomical data collected and analyzed by using SAS software 9.0 version.
Result: The combined analysis of variance revealed significant differences among the genotypes. Based on ANOVA and GEI analysis result three promising genotypes namely ICCV-93954, DO47 and ICC-07108 with average seed yield of 2931.5kg/ha, 2731.6kg/ha and 2335.4kg/ha respectively, were selected and verified. Among the verified genotypes ICCV- 93954 has been officially released and recommended in the name of Mitik, for production in the tested and similar areas of chickpea growing in the region.


Chickpea Genotypes Genotype-environment interaction Seed yield


  1. Alam, Md A., Sarker, Z.I., Farhad, Md, Hakim, A. and Chandra, N. (2015). Yield stability of newly released wheat varieties in multi-environments of Bangladish. International Journal of Plant and Soil Science. 6(3): 150-161.
  2. Asnake, F. and Dagnachew, B. (2020). Chickpea Breeding and Crop Improvement in Ethiopia: Past, Present and the Future. Universal Journal of Agricultural Research 8(2): 33-40. http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/ujar.2020. 080202.
  3. Bavandpori, A.F., Ahmadi, J. and Hossaini, S. (2015). yield stability analysis of bread wheat lines using AMMI model. Agricultural Communications. 3(1): 8-15. 
  4. CSA (Central Statistical Agency) (2019). Central Statistical Agency. Agricultural sample survey (2018), report on area and production for major crops (private peasant holdings, main season), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  5. Farshadfar, E., Mahmodi, N. and Anita Yaghotipoor. (2011). AMMI stability value and simultaneous estimation of yield and yield stability in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Aust. Jour. Crop Sci. (13):1837-1844.
  6. Farshadfar, E. (2008). Incorporation of AMMI stability value and grain yield in a single non-parametric index (GSI) in bread. Pak. J. Biol Sci. 11(14): 1791-17966. doi: 10.3923/pjbs. 2008.1791.1796.
  7. Ferney, G.B., Alexei, M. and Aigul, A. (2007). Evaluation of grain yield stability, in spring wheat from Kazakhstan and Siberia. Journal of Central European Agriculture. 7: 649-660.
  8. Gul, R., Khan, H., Sattar, S, Farhatullah, Munsif, F., Shadman, Khan B.S.A., Khattak, S.H., Arif, M., Ali, A. (2011). Comparison among nodulated and non nodulated chickpea genotypes, Sarhad Jorna of Agriculture. 27(4): 577-581.
  9. International Crop Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) (2010). Pooran M Gaur, Shailesh Tripathi, CL Laxmipathi Gowda, GV Ranga Rao, HC Sharma, Suresh Pande and Mamta Sharma, Patancheru 502 324 Andhra Pradesh, India (2010), Chickpea Seed Production Manual.
  10. Kadhem and Baktash (2016). Ammi analysis of adaptability and yield stability of promising lines of bread wheat (Triticum aestavum L.) The Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 47: (Special Issue): 35-43.
  11. Mohammadi, R., Abdulahi, A., Haghparast, R. and Armion, M. (2007). Interpreting genotype environment interactions for durum wheat grain yields using non-parametric methods. Euphytica. 157: 239-251.
  12. Mukherjee, A.K., Mohapatra, N.K., Bose, L.K., Jambhulkar, N.N and Nayak, P. (2013). Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis of GxE interactions in rice-blast pathosystem to identify stable resistant genotypes. African Journal of Research. 8 (44): 5492-5507, 14 November, 2013 DOI: 10.5897/AJAR12.2118 ISSN 1991-637X@2013 academic Journals http//www. academicjournals. org/AJAR.
  13. Purchase, J.L., Hating, H. and Van Deventer, C.S. (2000). Genotype x environment interaction of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in South Africa: II. Stability analysis of yield performance. South Africa Journal Plant Soil 17: 101-107.
  14. SAS (2004). Statistical Analysis Systems SAS/STAT user’s guide Version 9.0 Cary NC: SAS Institute Inc. USA.
  15. Shafique, M.S., Ahsan, M., Mehmood, Z., Abdullah, M., Shakoor, A., Ahmad, M.I. (2016). Genetic variability and interrelationship of various agronomic traits using correlation and path analysis in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Acadamic Journal of Agricultural Research. 4(2): 082-085.
  16. Tarakanovas, P. and Ruzgas, V. (2006). Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction analysis of grain yield of wheat varieties in Lithuania. Agronomy research 4(1): 91-98.
  17. Tebkew Damte and Chris O. Ojiewo (2016). Current status of wilt/root rot diseases in major chickpea growing areas of Ethiopia, Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection. ISSN:0323-5408 (Print) 1477-2906 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/gapp20
  18. Tonk, F.A., IIker, E. and Tosum, M. (2011). Evaluation of genotype by environment interactions in maize hybrids using GGE bi-plot analysis. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology. 11(1): 01-09. 

Global Footprints