Identification of Social Dynamic of the Economic Smallholders of Palm Oil Plannation on Keerom District of Papua

DOI: 10.18805/ag.D-179    | Article Id: D-179 | Page : 154-158
Citation :- Identification of Social Dynamic of the Economic Smallholders of Palm Oil Plannation on Keerom District of Papua.Agricultural Science Digest.2020.(40):154-158
Address : University Cenderawasih Jayapura, Papua, Indonesia.
Submitted Date : 24-07-2019
Accepted Date : 26-12-2019

Abstract

The Core Country Plantation (PIR) is the government program to improve the welfare of smallholders. The purpose of this research is to identify the state of the development of Core Country Plantation (PIR) in Keerom district. This research is qualitative descriptive research. Data collection in this study with two types of data is primary data and secondary data. The results of the identification show that the factors that caused a decline in welfare have an impact on the socio-economic dynamics caused by the low yields of palm oil production. As a solution, the government provides a nucleus plantation program (PIR), to overcome socio-economic dynamics in the Papua border area of Keerom Regency.

Keywords

Conflict Core Country Plantation (PIR) Poverty

References

  1. Agbiboa, Daniel. (2013). The Ongoing Campaign of Terror in Nigeria: Boko Haram versus the State. Stability: International Journal of Security and Development. 2(3).
  2. Badjeck, Marie-Caroline, Edward H Allison, Ashley S Halls and Nicholas K Dulvy. (2010). Impacts of climate variability and change on fishery-based livelihoods. Marine Policy. 34(3): 375–83.
  3. Bissonnette, Jean-François. (2016). Is oil palm agribusiness a sustainable development option for Indonesia? A Review of issues and options. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d’études du développement. 37(4): 446–65.
  4. Bissonnette, Jean-François and Rodolphe De Koninck. (2015). Large Plantations versus smallholdings in Southeast Asia: historical and contemporary Trends. In Conference on Land Grabbing, Conflict and Agrarian-Environmental Transformations: Perspective from East and Southeast Asia. 5–6.
  5. Bogdan, Robert and Sari Knopp Biklen. (1997). Qualitative Research for Education. Allyn & Bacon Boston, MA.
  6. Chenail, Ronald J. (1995). Presenting Qualitative Data. The qualitative report. 2(3): 1–9.
  7. Creswell, John W and David J Creswell. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage publications.
  8. Dauvergne, Peter and Kate J Neville. (2010). Forests, food and fuel in the Tropics: The uneven social and ecological consequences of the emerging political economy of biofuels. Journal of peasant studies. 37(4): 631–60.
  9. Fauzi, Yan, Yustina E Widyastuti, Iman Satyawibawa and Rudi H Paeru. (2012). Kelapa Sawit. Penebar Swadaya Grup.
  10. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, Ada. (2005). Income and well-being: an empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics. 89(5–6): 997–1019.
  11. Fortin, Claude Joel. (2011). The Biofuel Boom and Indonesia’s Oil Palm Industry: The Twin Processes of Peasant Dispossession and Adverse Incorporation in West Kalimantan.
  12. Fulzele, R M, Avinashilingam N A and Singh Upayana. (2004). Preferences of rural youths’ in social, domestic, recreational and dairy farming activities. Journal of Dairying Foods & Home Sciences. 23(2): 117–21.
  13. Hooghe, Liesbet and Gary Marks. (2003). Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-Level Governance. American Political Science Review. 233–43.
  14. Irwandi, Irwandi and Endah Ratnawaty Chotim. (2017). Analisis Konflik Antara Masyarakat, Pemerintah Dan Swasta. JISPO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik. 7(2): 24–42.
  15. Kartodihardjo, Hariadi and Agus Supriono. (2000). Dampak Pembangunan Sektoral Terhadap Konversi Dan Degradasi Hutan Alam: Kasus Pembangunan HTI Dan Perkebunan Di Indonesia. Center for International Forestry Research.
  16. Mair, Johanna and Ignasi Marti. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: a source of explanation, prediction and delight. Journal of World Business. 41(1): 36–44.
  17. McCarthy, John F. (2010). Processes of inclusion and adverse incorporation: Oil Palm and Agrarian Change in Sumatra, Indonesia. The Journal of Peasant Studies. 37(4): 821-50.
  18. Mulyoutami, Elok. (2010). Perubahan Pola Perladangan: Pergeseran Persepsi Mengenai Para Peladang Di Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre.
  19. Neergaard, Mette Asbjoern, Frede Olesen, Rikke Andersen Sand and Sondergaard Jens. (2009). Qualitative description–    the poor cousin of health research?” BMC Medical Research Methodology. 9(1): 52.
  20. Noe, Raymond A, Hollenbeck John R, Gerhart Barry and Wright Patrick M. (2017). Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage. McGraw-Hill Education New York, NY.
  21. Obidzinski, Krystof, Andriani Rubeta, Komarudin Heru and Andrianto Agus. (2012). Environmental and social impacts of oil palm plantations and their implications for biofuel production in Indonesia. Ecology and Society. 17(1).
  22. Percy, William H, Kim Kostere and Sandra Kostere. (2015). Generic qualitative research in psychology. The Qualitative Report. 20(2): 76–85.
  23. Pratama, Yoghi Citra. (2014). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kemiskinan Di Indonesia. Esensi. Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen. 4(2).
  24. Pretty, Jules N, Morison James I L and Hine Rachel E. (2003). Reducing food poverty by increasing agricultural sustainability in developing countries. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 95(1): 217–34.
  25. Rist, Lucy, Feintrenie Laurene and Levang Patrice. (2010). The livelihood impacts of oil palm: smallholders in Indonesia. Biodiversity and conservation. 19(4): 1009–24.
  26. Rivai, Rudy Sunarja and Iwan Setiajie Anugrah. (2016). Konsep Dan Implementasi Pembangunan Pertanian Berkelanjutan Di Indonesia. In Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi. 13–25.
  27. Ritchie, Jane and Spencer Liz. (2002). Qualitative Data Analysis for Applied Policy Research. The Qualitative Researcher’s Companion. 573: 305–29.
  28. Sandy, Semuel and Irmanto Maxsi. (2014). Analisis Model Faktor Risiko Infeksi Cacing Gelang (Ascaris Lumbricoides) Pada Murid SD Di Distrik Arso Kabupaten Keerom Papua. Jurnal Buski 5(1).
  29. Senewe, Felly Philipus and Yuana Wiryawan. (2012). Gambaran Status Kesehatan Penduduk Di Daerah Perbatasan. Indonesian Journal of Health Ecology. 11(2): 99–111.
  30. Sukapti, Mrs. (2019). Oil Palm Plantation PIR Model: The Power Relationship between Planters and Company. In International Conference on Rural Studies in Asia (ICoRSIA 2018), Atlantis Press.
  31. Susila, Wayan R and Darma I D M Setiawan. (2016). Peran Industri Berbasis Perkebunan Dalam Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Dan Pemerataan: Pendekatan Sistem Neraca Sosial Ekonomi. Jurnal Agro Ekonomi. 25(2): 125–47.
  32. Syahza, Almasdi. (2007). Percepatan Pemberdayaan Ekonomi Masyarakat Pedesaan Dengan Model Agroestate Berbasis Kelapa Sawit. Jurnal Ekonomi. 12(2).
  33. Percepatan Ekonomi Pedesaan Melalui Pembangunan Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi dan Pembangunan. 12(2): 297–310.
  34. Trijono, Lambang. (2007). Pembangunan Sebagai Perdamaian: Rekonstruksi Indonesia Pasca-Konflik. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  35. Turua, Untung, Setia Hadi, Bambang Juanda and Endah Murniningtyas. (2014). Ekologi dan Budaya Petani Asli Papua Dalam Usaha Tani di Kabupaten Keerom. Sosiohumaniora. 16(3): 234–41.
  36. White, Ben and Dasgupta Anirban. (2010). Agrofuels Capitalism: A View from Political Economy. The Journal of Peasant Studies. 37(4): 593–607.
  37. Wicke, Birka, Dornburg Veronika, Junginger Martin and Faaij André. (2008). Different palm oil production systems for energy purposes and their greenhouse gas implications. Biomass and Bioenergy. 32(12): 1322–37.
  38. Wicke, Birka, Sikkema Richard, Dornburg Veronika and Faaij André. (2011). Exploring Land Use Changes and the role of palm oil production in Indonesia and Malaysia. Land Use Policy. 28(1): 193–206.
  39. Williams, Heather L. (2001). Social Movements and Economic Transition: Markets and Distributive Conflict in Mexico. Cambridge University Press.
  40. Winarso, Bambang. (2017). Dinamika pola penguasaan Lahan Sawah Di Wilayah Pedesaan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Pertanian Terapan. 12(3).
  41. Yunita, Desi. (2017). Perubahan infrastruktur sosial sebagai Implikasi Perubahan Sistem Pertanian (Kasus Pada Masyarakat Petani Kelapa Sawit). Sosioglobal. Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Sosiologi. 1(2): 115–31.

Global Footprints