Experimental site
The experiment was carried out at the Kalahari Goat unit of the Institute for Food Security, Environmental Resources and Agricultural Research (IFSERAR) of Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, (FUNAAB), Ogun State, South West, Nigeria in year 2016. The experimental site is located in the rain forest vegetation zone of South-Western Nigeria on the Latitude 7o 13’ 47.41’’N, Longitude 3o 23’ 43.48’’E and altitude 76m above the sea level Google earth (2016).
Preparation of test ingredient (turmeric powder)
Fresh turmeric rhizomes were sourced from local market in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. The rhizomes were washed after purchase, sliced into smaller pieces and oven dried at 60oC to a constant weight. The dried rhizomes were then milled into fine powder using electric blender (Panasonic, Japan) before its inclusion in the experimental diet.
Experimental animals and management
A total of thirty (30) pregnant does in their first trimester (1-50 days) consisting of 15 West African Dwarf (WAD) and 15 KalaWAD does within age range of 1 -2 years with average weight of 20.54±2.01kg were used in this experiment. The goats were selected from the herd at the Kalahari Red goat unit of Institute for Food Security, Environmental Resources and Agricultural Research (IFSERAR), Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, (FUNAAB), Ogun State. The does were mated by well proven experienced Kalahari Red bucks after synchronization using prostaglandin Lutalyse® (contains 5mg/ml Dinoprost Triomethamine) injection at 1ml per doe which was injected through intramuscular route at the interval of ten days
(Bitaraf et al., 2007; Kenfack et al., 2013). The animals shortly before mating were dewormed and treated against endo and ecto parasite by intramuscular administration of Oxytetracycline 20% (Oxytetracycline 200mg/ml as dihydrate) at 1ml per 20kg body weight and Ivanor® Injection (Ivermectin 10mg/ml) was also administered subcutaneously at 1 ml per 50 kg bodyweight respectively.
Experimental design
The does were randomly allotted to three treatment groups after balancing for weight comprising of 5 does per treatment in a 2×3 factorial experimental layout in a completely randomized design. The animals were placed in an individual pen with slated floor of adequate spacing. The experimental diets are fed by 08:00h in the morning while Congo signal (
Brachiaria ruziziensis) grass in dry form was fed by 13:00h. Fresh and clean portable water was made available to the goats daily ad libitum. The animals were fed with the experimental diets for 7days period of adaptation prior to the commencement of the experiment and throughout the experimental period. The does were fed the experimental diets (i.e. TU0, TU2 and TU5) at 5% of their body weight as shown in Table 1. The dietary treatments were as follows:
Diet 1 (TU0): basal concentrate diet + 0g/kg turmeric powder,
Diet 2 (TU2): basal concentrate diet + 2g/kg turmeric powder,
Diet 3 (TU2): basal concentrate diet + 2g/kg turmeric powder.
Performance evaluation
The following growth performance parameters were taken using Avery Weigh-Tronix® Electronic scale- 400kg capacity during the experimental period that lasted for 161days.
·
Initial weight of the does
This was the weight of the experimental does which was taken at mating.
·
Final Weight of the does
This was the weight of the does taken within 24 hours before kidding.
·
Does’ Live–weight after kidding (weight within 24hours post kidding)
This was the weight of the does which was taken within 24hours after kidding. This was taken when the placenta, umbilical cord and other foetal membranes like allantois, chorion and amnion (with the amniotic fluid) were expelled.
·
Live-weight changes during gestation period
this was determined by taking the initial weight of the animals at the introduction of bucks followed by weighing of the pregnant does on fourth-nightly (i.e. every two weeks) until the last doe kidded on the 161days.
·
Weight change (Gross weight change)
This was determined by deduction of initial weight at mating from the final weight of the doe taken 24hours before kidding
using the following formula.
Weight change (kg) = final weight (kg) - initial weight (kg)
·
Net weight change (weight gain by does after parturition)
This was calculated by deduction of the initial weight of the does at mating from the doe’s live-weight 24hours after kidding using the following formula.
Net weight gain (kg) = wt within 24 hr after kidding (kg) - wt at mating
·
Daily weight gain (g/day) = weight gain (g) / gestation length (days)
·
Metabolic weights
a. weight gain (gday
-1 W
-0.75) =
b. initial weight (gday
-1 W
-0.75) = Initial weight (kg)
0.75
c. final weight (gday
-1 W
-0.75) = Final weight (kg)
0.75
·
Feed Intake
A known quantity of concentrate feed and grass were offered to each animal daily throughout the experimental period. The difference in total feed offered and feed left over were taken as the feed intake.
Feed Conversion Ratio= Total feed consumed (g) / weight gain (g)
Proximate composition
The proximate composition which included; crude protein, crude fibre, ether extract, carbohydrate and ash of the experimental diets, grass and turmeric powder were determined according to the method described by AOAC (2005) at Food Processing Laboratory in the Department of Food Science and Technology, Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta, Nigeria. The dry matter was determined by oven drying the samples to a constant weight at 65oC. Crude protein was determined as Kjedhal nitrogen ×6.25. The fibre fractions such as neutral detergent fibre (NDF), acid detergent fibre (ADF) and acid detergent lignin (ADL) was determined using the method described by Van
Soest et al., (1991). While the hemicellulose and the cellulose were determined by the difference between NDF and ADF, ADF and ADL respectively.
Statistical analysis
All the data collected were subjected to two way ANOVA in completely randomized design using the General linear model (GLM) procedures of Statistical Analysis System (SAS) (2004). Level of significance were taken as (p < 0.05) while the different means were separated using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test of the same statistical package.