Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 41 issue 3 (september 2021) : 492-497

Light and Electron Microscopic Studies of the Seminal Vesicular Glands of the African Straw-coloured Fruit Bat, Eidolon helvum

C.N. Abiaezute1,*, I.C. Nwaogu1, I.R. Obidike2, U.M. Igwebuike1
1Department of Veterinary Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, 410001, Enugu State, Nigeria.
2Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, 410001, Enugu State, Nigeria.
Cite article:- Abiaezute C.N., Nwaogu I.C., Obidike I.R., Igwebuike U.M. (2021). Light and Electron Microscopic Studies of the Seminal Vesicular Glands of the African Straw-coloured Fruit Bat, Eidolon helvum . Agricultural Science Digest. 41(3): 492-497. doi: 10.18805/ag.B-1277.
Background: Secretions from the seminal vesicular gland enhance the survival and reproductive functions of the spermatozoa. The order Chiroptera has evolved great diversity in their reproductive structure influenced by location, abiotic factors and availability of food. Eidolon helvum is a near threatened tropical African fruit bat and little is known of its reproductive biology. The aim of this study was to highlight the structure, histochemistry and ultrastructure of the seminal vesicular glands of Eidolon helvum

Methods: The paired seminal vesicular glands of 16 adult male Eidolon helvum were obtained in May during the early rainy season in tropical Nigeria. The glands were evaluated grossly, histological and ultrastructurally.

Result: The spirally coiled tubular organs were divided into numerous lobules of tubular-alveolar glandular acini lined by simple cuboidal epithelium made up of basal cells and mono or bi-nucleated cuboidal secretory cells. PAS positive secretions projected from the apical surfaces. Principal secretory cells contained numerous rough endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria, Golgi complexes, electron lucid secretory vesicles, electron dense granules and lysosomes. The unique merocrine and apocrine secretions contributed to the formation of vaginal plugs.
The seminal vesicular glands with other accessory reproductive glands produce and elaborate numerous secretions important in male reproductive functions. The secretions from the seminal vesicular glands are rich in prostaglandins, proteins, amino acids and fructose necessary for the motility, viability and survival of the spermatozoa (Stevens and Lowe, 2001; Rochel et al., 2007; Santos et al., 2018). The secretions also contribute to vaginal plug formation in some rodents (Chaves et al., 2011). The gland produces 15-20% of the total ejaculatory volume and 80-90% of the seminal plasma proteins in the pig (Badia et al., 2006; Dyce et al., 2010). The paired glands are variable in size and shape and are located dorsolateral to the neck of the urethra in all domestic animals except the dog and cat (Dyce et al., 2010). The glands are saccular in human, horses and rats, compact and multi-lobulated in pigs, bulls and hedgehogs and are branched and tubular in rodents (Samuelson, 2007; Adebayo et al., 2014; Akbari et al., 2018). In the bat species which showed great diversity in the male reproductive structures influenced greatly by latitude, abiotic factors and food availability (Puga et al., 2013), the seminal vesicular glands shows great variations in shape and availability, being present in some bat species (Krutzsch, 2005; Fard and Ghassemi, 2017) but absent in others (Pal, 1983; Krishna and Singh, 1997; Christante et al., 2015; Martins et al., 2015; Beguelini et al., 2016; Santos et al., 2018).
 
The primary habitat of the African straw-coloured fruit bat, Eidolon helvum, is the tropical rainforest but it however embarks on annual migration to the savannah region due to rainfalls and associated changes in food abundance (Defrees and Wilson, 1988; Mickleburgh et al., 2011). Despite the extensive distribution in Africa, popularity and immense contributions to the ecosystem, little attention has been given to the reproductive biology of this bat. There are no available reports on the ultrastructure of the seminal vesicles of this bat species. This bat has now been listed as a near threatened species of bat by the International Union for Conservation of Nature due to rapid population decline from over hunting for bush meat and traditional medicine in West and Central Africa (Kamins et al., 2011; Mildenstein et al., 2016). The aim of this study is to document the structure, histochemistry and ultrastructure of the seminal vesicular glands of Eidolon helvum.
Animal care and use
 
The bats used in this study were humanely handled and cared for in compliance with the guidelines authorised by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Nigeria, Nsukka (FVM-UNN-IACUC-2019-0710).
 
Experimental animals
 
Sixteen adult male African straw-coloured fruit bats were captured with mist nets at their roosting sites in Obiagu community in Enugu state of Nigeria located on latitude 6°26'14.7408" N and longitude 7°30'13.3092" E within the tropical rain forest belt. The bats were captured in May 2019 during the early rainy season. Adult male bats were identified by their weights and presence of bright orange collar (Defrees and Wilson, 1988) and fusion of the epiphyseal plates of the fourth metacarpal-phalangeal bones (Brunet-Rossini and Wilkinson, 2009). The bats were weighed and euthanized within 6 hours with ketamine hydrochloride (13 mg/kg body weight) administered intramuscularly. Upon death, the vesicular glands were removed and evaluated histologically at the Department of Veterinary Anatomy, University of Nigeria Nsukka and ultrastructurally at the Electron Microscopy unit, University of Pretoria, South Africa. 
 
Histology and histochemistry
 
Tissues of seminal vesicular glands of the bats were fixed by immersion in 10% neutral-buffered formalin and thereafter prepared for histology and routinely stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and a combination of Alcian Blue and Periodic Acid Schiff (AB/PAS) stains for the detection of acidic and neutral mucopolysaccharides using Bancroft and Gamble (2008) methods. The stained slides were examined with a binocular microscope (Olympus Optica, Tokyo, Japan) and images captured and analysed with Moticam Images Plus 2.0 digital camera of 1.3 M pixel (Motic China Group Ltd).
 
Electron microscopy
 
Seminal vesicular gland tissues were cut into small pieces of ~1mm thickness and fixed by immersion in modified Karnovsky fixative containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1M phosphate buffer solution at pH 7.4. The tissues were rinsed in 0.075M phosphate buffer and post-fixed in 0.5% aqueous osmium tetroxide for 2 hours. They were dehydrated in ascending ethanol concentration, cleared with propylene oxide, embedded in epoxy resin and finally polymerised at 60°C for 36 hours. Ultrathin sections (50 nm) were obtained with diamond knife and stained with saturated aqueous solutions of uranyl acetate and Reynold’s lead citrate and thereafter analysed on a Philips CM 10 Transmission Electron Microscope.
Gross observations
 
The paired seminal vesicular glands of Eidolon helvum appeared as large milky coloured and somewhat spiral shaped tubes located dorsolateral to the urinary bladder and prostate gland (Figs 1A and B). The seminal vesicular tubes appeared tapered at their openings into the urethra but enlarged as the tubes coiled centripetally outwards indicating availability of seminal vesicular glands unlike most bats that lacked this gland (Christante et al., 2015; Martins et al., 2015; Beguelini et al., 2016; Santos et al., 2018). The spiral shape in Eidolon helvum confirmed the variability in bats (Krutzsch and Nellis, 2006; Fard and Ghassemi, 2017) and other mammals (Badia et al., 2006; Samuelson, 2007; Adebayo et al., 2014; Nissar et al., 2014; Akbari et al., 2018) with seminal vesicular glands.
 
@figure1
 
Histology and histochemistry
 
The seminal vesicular gland was enclosed by a variably thick capsule of outer connective tissues and inner smooth muscle layers (Fig 2C). Originating from the capsular layer, thin trabeculae penetrated and divided the glandular parenchyma into numerous lobules, forming a delicate thin network of interlobular connective tissues. Each lobule was a tubular-alveolar glandular acinus and the mucosa lined by simple cuboidal epithelium made up of two cell types; cuboidal secretory cells and basal cells (Fig 2A). These observations were similar to other bats and Southern White-breasted Hedgehog (Krutzsch and Nellis, 2006; Fard and Ghassemi, 2017; Akbari et al., 2018). This varied greatly from the numerous lobes and lobules occupied by longitudinally branching and sometimes anastomosing mucosal folds of most mammalian vesicular glands (Risbridger and Taylor, 2006; Wrobel and Bergmann, 2006; Adebayo et al., 2014; Nissar et al., 2014). These differences probably confirmed the species-specific variations in the seminal vesicular glands of mammals. The cuboidal secretory cells which constituted the major epithelial cells possessed centrally located, euchromatic, oval nuclei with prominent nucleoli. However, binucleated cuboidal cells were frequently encountered in the epithelium. Similarly binucleation were observed in mammals and may represent different types or stages of the secretory cell as most mammalian vesicular glands possessed two types of columnar secretory (light and dense) cells (Riva and Aumüller, 1994; Badia et al., 2006; Adebayo et al., 2014).
 
@figure2
 
The apical cytoplasm of the secretory cuboidal cells stained lightly with eosinophilic granules and gelatinous eosinophilic apical blebs projected from the apical surface of the cuboidal cell into the lumen filled with numerous singly occurring gelatinous eosinophilic secretions. Similar observations had been reported in other bats and mammals (Krutzsch and Nellis, 2006; Wrobel and Bergmann 2006; Adebayo et al., 2014; Fard and Ghassemi, 2017; Akbari et al., 2018). PAS/Alcian blue stain showed that these secretions were PAS positive (Fig 2B) and similar PAS positive reactions had been described in the epithelial cells of mammalian seminal vesicular glands that secretes fructose, other sugars, prostaglandins, flavins, phosphorylcholine, vitamin C, proteins, neutral mucins and sialomucins (Krutzsch, 2000; Wrobel and Bergmann 2006). This may be related to the presence of glycogen moiety which occurred as glycoprotein or neutral mucins and sialomucins known to be nutritive and protective to the spermatozoa and the reproductive tracts. The Alcian blue negative reaction in this study suggests absence of acidic mucins which may be injurious to the spermatozoa and the organ, thus affecting reproductive health.
 
Electron microscopy
 
Ultrastructural analysis confirmed that the seminal vesicular glands of Eidolon helvum were lined by simple cuboidal epithelium made up of cuboidal and basal cells. The epithelial cells rested on a thin basal lamina that separated the epithelium from the underlining interstitial connective tissues (Fig 3). The principal cuboidal cells contained centrally located mono or bi-nucleated oval euchromatic nuclei with nuclear membrane-associated heterochromatin condensations. The cytoplasm contained numerous Rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER), mitochondria and poly-ribosomes, Golgi complexes, electron lucid secretory vesicles, electron dense granules and lysosomes (Figs 4 and 5). These observations were similar to the columnar secretory cells of vesicular glands reported in man (Riva and Aumüller, 1994), pig (Badia et al., 2006) and rodents (Oke and Aire, 1997; Adebayo et al., 2014). The presence of abundant well developed RER, Golgi complex and mitochondria indicates that these cells are active with intense protein synthesis and secretion, with lots of energy expended in the process. The energy needed for protein synthesis had been quantified at about four high-energy phosphate bonds (Albert et al., 2002) representing a great amount of ATP being expended (Bardia et al., 2006). This energetic consumption probably explains the large number of mitochondria, sugars and lipids which can be converted into acetyl-CoA and oxidised to CO2 via the citric acid cycle (Badia et al., 2006). The presence of lysosomes in this study may aid in normal turnover, removal and digestion of old or worn-out organelles in the cell due to the active protein synthesis within these cells.
 
@figure3
 
@figure4
 
@figure5
 
The apical border showed numerous tall cilia that projected into the lumen. Numerous electron dense granules were attached to the cilia (Fig 5 and 6). The mono and bi-nucleated cells showed no difference in their structures and cytoplasmic contents while the basal cells are small and located between two secretory cells basally. The dark granules were observed secreted by exocytosis and upon extrusion were either observed singly in the lumen or lined the length of the apical cilia (6A) after which the granules were released into the lumen as a ball without the cilia (Fig 6B). Apocrine mode of secretion was also observed in which the apical cytoplasm was walled off by plasma membrane and its content budded off with the granules attached to the cilia (Fig 7). These methods of elaboration presents another unique mode of elaboration of seminal glands as most secretory methods reported in mammalian vesicular glands were mostly apocrine mode (Badia et al., 2006; Adebayo et al., 2014). The content of the glandular lumen are balls of granules with some consisting of apical cytoplasm and cilia while others are balls of granules without apical cytoplasm and cilia (Figs 3, 5, 6 and 7). These secretions and the gelatinous gel-like nature of the secretions probably aids in vaginal plug formation in Eidolon helvum as seen in numerous bat species (Krutzsch, 2000) and rodents (Banks, 1993).
 
@figure7
In conclusion, the African straw-coloured fruit bat exhibited unique histology and ultrastructure of the seminal vesicular glands as well as unique modes of secretory processes. These unique modes of secretion may account for vaginal plug formation in Eidolon helvum and may serve as the necessary information for further research on the roles and contributions of this gland to the reproductive biology of this species of bat.
This work was financially supported by the Academic Staff Training and Development Scheme of Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFund) of Nigeria.

  1. Adebayo, A.O., Olukole, S.G., Oke, B.O., Akinloye, A.K., Ihunwo, A.O. (2014). Structural, ultrastructural and immunohisto- -chemical analysis of the vesicular gland in the male greater cane rat (Thryonomys swinderianus). European Journal of Anatomy. 18: 317-325.

  2. Akbari, G., Kianifard, D., Babaei, M. (2018). Anatomy, histology and histochemistry of accessory sex glands and their ducts in male southern white-breasted hedgehog Erinaceus concolor Martin, 1838 (Mammalia: Erinaceidae). Acta Zoologica Bulgarica. 70: 349-357.

  3. Alberts, B., Bray, D., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K. Watson, J.D. (2002). Molecular Biology of the Cell. Garland Publishing, New York, pp. 1463. 

  4. Badia, E., Briz, M.D., Pinart, E., Sancho, S., Garcia-Gil, N., Bassols, J., Pruneda, A., Bussalleu, E., Yeste, M., Casas, I. Bonet, S. (2006). Structural and ultrastructural features of boar seminal vesicles. Tissue and Cell. 38: 79-91.

  5. Bancroft, J.D. and Gamble, M. (2008). Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques. Elsevier Health Sciences.

  6. Banks, W.J. (1993). Applied Veterinary Histology, 3rd edn. Mosby Incorporated, Missouri. 

  7. Beguelini, M.R., Puga, C.C., Morielle Versute, E., Taboga, S.R. (2016). Comparative analysis of the male reproductive accessory glands of bats Noctilio albiventris (Noctilionidae) and Rhynchonycteris naso (Emballonuridae). Journal of Morphology. 277: 1459-1468.

  8. Brunet-Rossinni, A.K. and Wilkinson, G.S. (2009). Methods for age estimation and the study of senescence in bats. In: Ecological and Behavioral Methods for the Study of Bats. [T.H. Kunz & S. Parsons (Eds)], The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, USA.

  9. Chaves, E.M., Aguilera Merlo, C., Filippa, V., Mohamed, F., Dominguez, S., Scardapane, L. (2011). Anatomical, histological and immunohistochemical study of the reproductive system accessory glands in male viscacha (Lagostomus maximus maximus). Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia. 40: 11-20.

  10. Christante, C.M., Beguelini, M.R., Puga, C.C., Negrin, A.C., Morielle-Versute, E., Vilamaior, P.S., Taboga, S.R. (2015). Structure, histochemistry and seasonal variations of the male reproductive accessory glands in the Pallas’s mastiff bat, Molossus molossus (Chiroptera: Molossidae). Reproduction, Fertility and Development. 27: 313-322.

  11. DeFrees, S.L. and Wilson, D.E. (1988). Eidolon helvum. Mammalian Species. 312: 1-5.

  12. Dyce, K.M., Sack, W.O., Wensing, C.J.G., (2010). Textbook of Veterinary anatomy. 4th edn. Saunders Elsevier. St Louis, Missouri. 

  13. Fard, E.A. and Ghassemi, F. (2017). Histological and morophometrical study of male reproductive tract in Rousettus aegyptiacus (Mammalia: Megachiroptera) in Iran. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 5: 229-234. 

  14. Kamins, A.O., Restif, O., Ntiamoa-Baidu, Y., Suu-Ire, R., Hayman, D.T., Cunningham, A.A., Wood, J.L., Rowcliffe, J.M. (2011). Uncovering the fruit bat bushmeat commodity chain and the true extent of fruit bat hunting in Ghana, West Africa. Biological Conservation. 144: 3000-3008.

  15. Krishna, A. and Singh, K. (1997). The relationship between testicular activity, accessory sex glands and circulating steroid concentration during the reproductive cycle in a male Indian vespertilionid bat, Scotophilus heathi. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 75: 1042-1050. 

  16. Krutzsch, P.H. and Nellis, D.W. (2006). Reproductive anatomy and cyclicity of the male bat Brachyphylla cavernarum (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Acta Chiropterologica. 8: 497-507.

  17. Krutzsch, P.H. (2000). Anatomy, physiology and cyclicity of the male reproductive tract. In: Reproductive biology of bats. [Crichton E.G., Krutzsch, P.H. (Eds)]. Academic Press, London.

  18. Krutzsch, P.H. (2005). Reproductive anatomy and cyclicity of the bat Eonycteris spelaea Dobson (Chiroptera: Pteropodidae) in West Malaysia. Acta Chiropterologica. 7: 51-64.

  19. Martins, F.F., Puga, C.C., Beguelini, M.R., Morielle Versute, E., Vilamaior, P.S., Taboga, S. R. (2015). Comparative analysis of the male reproductive accessory glands of bat species from the five Brazilian subfamilies of the family Phyllostomidae (Chiroptera). Journal of Morphology. 276: 470-480.

  20. Mickleburgh, S., Hutson, A.M., Bergmans, W., Fahr, J., Racey, P.A. (2011). Eidolon helvum. In: IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, Version, 2. www.iucnredlist.org.

  21. Mildenstein, T., Tanshi, I., Racey, P.A. (2016). Exploitation of bats for bushmeat and medicine. In: Bats in the Anthropocene: conservation of bats in a changing world Springer, Cham. pp. 325-375.

  22. Nissar, S., Suri, S., Sarma, K. (2014). Micrometrical, histological and histochemical studies on the seminal vesicles of Bakerwali goat (Kangani). Indian Journal of Animal Research. 48: 350-354.

  23. Oke, B.O. and Aire, T.A. (1997). The epithelium of the vesicular gland of the African giant rat (Cricetomys gambianus, Waterhouse): Histology and Ultrastructure. African Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences. 26: 69-72. 

  24. Pal, A.N. (1983). Male sex accessory glands of the bat, Miniopterus schreibersii fuliginosus (Hodgson). Comparative Physiology and Ecology. 8: 307-308.

  25. Puga, C.C.I., Beguelini, M.R., Negrin, A.C., Christante, C.M., Morielle-Versute, E., Vilamaior, P.S.L., Taboga, S.R. (2013). Structure, histochemistry and ultrastructure of the male reproductive accessory glands in the Neotropical flat-faced fruit-eating bat, Artibeus planirostris (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Reproduction Fertility and Development. 25: 558-569. 

  26. Risbridger, G.P. and Taylor, R.A. (2006). Physiology of the male accessory sex structures: the prostate gland, seminal vesicles and bulbourethral glands. In: Knobil and Neill’s Physiology of Reproduction. [Plant, T.M., Zeleznik, A.J. (Eds)], Academic Press. New York.

  27. Riva, A. and Aümuller, G. (1994). Epithelium of the distal portion of the human spermatic pathway: seminal vesicle, ampulla ductus deferentis and ejaculatory duct. In: Ultrastructure of the Male Urogenital Glands. Springer, Boston, MA. 

  28. Rochel, S.S., Bruni-Cardoso, A., Taboga, S.R., Vilamaior, P.S.L., Góes, R.M. (2007). Lobe identity in the Mongolian gerbil prostatic complex: a new rodent model for prostate study. Anatomical Record. 290: 1233-1247.

  29. Samuelson, A.D. (2007). Male reproductive system. In Textbook of Veterinary Histology. 1st edn. Saunders Elsevier, St Louis Saunders, Missouri. 

  30. Santos, R.T., Pires, L.R., Albernaz, E.S. andrade, C.S., Santiago, C.S., Morielle Versute, E., Taboga, S.R., Beguelini, M.R. (2018). Morphological analysis of the male reproductive accessory glands of the bat Artibeus lituratus (Phyllostomidae: Chiroptera). Journal of Morphology. 279: 228-241.

  31. Stevens, A. and Lowe, J. (2001). Histologia Humana, 2nd ed. Manole, São Paulo.

  32. Wrobel, K.H. and Bergmann, M. (2006). Male Reproductive System. In: Dellman’s Textbook of Histology, 6th edn. [Eurell, J.A. and Frappier, B.L. (Eds)]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Iowa.

Editorial Board

View all (0)