Agricultural Science Digest
your articles with us

Quick Facts

Payment Options

payment portals

Click here to pay directly


Mohan Lal*, Dhirendra singh and Sain Dass**
Department of Genetics and plant breeding Janta Vedic collage, Baraut - 221 502, India

Page Range:
206 - 210
Article ID:
Online Published:
A study was conducted of the heterosis in QPM maize, following line x tester analysis. The performance of fifty QPM maize hybrids along with their parents and checks were evaluated during rabi 2005-06. The analysis of variance revealed significant differences among the parents and F1 hybrids for all the characters. For days to 50% silking, thirteen hybrids exhibited negative significant heterobeltiosis. For days to 50% tasseling one hybrid (L4 xT5) exhibited negative significant economic heterosis in relation to best check, while none of the hybrids had given this indication for the days to silking. For grain yield per plant, hybrid L4 x T2 exhibited the highest heterosis (236.46 per cent) over better parent and checks. For protein content, thirteen hybrids depicted positive significant heterobeltiosis one hybrid exhibited positive significant economic heterosis over the best checks with magnitude was 9.18 percent (L2 X T5). For tryptophan content thirty two hybrids depicted positive significant heterobeltiosis, while four hybrids exhibited positive economic heterosis over the best checks. For lysine content only six hybrids depicted positive significant heterosis. The desirable crosses combination L 4 x T2, L7 x T3, L5 x T5, L4 x T3, and L7 xT1, L4 x T4, L7 x T4, L6 x T5 and L6 x T4 showed high magnitude of heterosis over better parents for yield along with quality characters.
Heterosis, QPM, Zea mays L.
  1. Dubey R. B. (2001). Heterosis for quality and yield in conventional and non-conventional hybrid of maize (Zea mays L.). Diamond Symposium, Indian Society of Genetics and Plant Breeding, New Delhi (PS), 23: 132.
  2. Dubey, R.B., Joshi,V.N. and Verma, M. (2009). Heterosis for nutritional quality and yield in conventional and non conventional hybrids of maize (Zea mays L). Indian J.Genet. 69 (2) :109-114.
  3. Pandiya N.K. (1996). Studies on exploitation of heterosis and its genetic basis in early maturity single cross hybrids of white seeded maize (Zea mays L.). Ph.D. Thesis (Unpublished), RAU, Udaipur, India.
  4. Vasal S.K., Dhillon, B.S. and Srinivasan, G. (1995). Changing scenario of hybrid maize breeding and research strategies of development hybrids. In hybrid Research and Development. M. Rai and S. Mauria (ed.), pp. 20-36. Indian Society of Seed Technology, IARI, New Delhi.
  5. Rao G.P., Rai, B., Singh, S.V. and Shani, J.P. (1996). Heterosis and combining ability in inter varietal crosses of maize. Madras Agric. J., 85 (5): 291-295.
  6. Marker S., Joshi, V.N. and Dubey, R.B. (2002). Heterosis and combining ability for quality, yield and maturity traits in single cross hybrid of maize (zea mays L.). Indian Soc. Agril. Biol. Chemist, pp. 53-57.
Global footprints

© 2015 ARCC JOURNALS. All Rights Reserved. Powered By ARCC JOURNALS