Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Science Digest, volume 32 issue 4 (december 2012) : 275 - 280

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MOLECULAR MARKERS IN ASSESSMENT OF GENETIC DIVERSITY OF JOWAR (SORGHUM SP.)

S.S. Shende*, P.M. Walhe, D.N. Damse, S.D. Bansod1
1College of Agril. Biotechnology, Marthwada Agriculture University, Latur-413 512, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Shende* S.S., Walhe P.M., Damse D.N., Bansod1 S.D. (2024). COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MOLECULAR MARKERS IN ASSESSMENT OF GENETIC DIVERSITY OF JOWAR (SORGHUM SP.). Agricultural Science Digest. 32(4): 275 - 280. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Sorghum is one of the widely grown cereal crop in the western region of India. A study was undertaken to ascertain the genetic diversity in sorghum accessions using 20 Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and 15 Inter Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR) markers. Based on polymorphic information content (PIC) and unique banding pattern five RAPD and six ISSR markers were found to be highly discriminative. The PIC values ranged from 0.08 to 0.20 for RAPD and from 0.04 to 0.31 for the ISSR markers. Cluster analysis of RAPD and ISSR markers indicated high genetic diversity among the sorghum accessions.

REFERENCES

  1. Arya L, Sandhia GS, Singh SK, Rana MK, Malik SS (2006) Analysis of Indian Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench] cultivars and lines using RAPD markers. J. Pl. Biochem Biotechnol 15: 0971-0981.
  2. Dahlberg JA, Zhang X, Hart GE, Mullet JE (2002) Comparative assessment of variation among sorghum germplasm accessions using seed morphology and RAPD measurements. Crop Sci 42: 291-296.
  3. Doggett H (1988) Sorghum 2nd ed. Longman & Green, Londonpp 512.
  4. FAO STAT (2004) Agricultural data, Available at http://apps./fao.org/default.htm.
  5. Jeya Prakash SP, Biji KR, Michael Gomez S, Ganesa Murthy K, Chandra Babu R (2006) Genetic diversity analysis of sorghum [Sorghum bicolar (L.) Moench] accessions using RAPD markers. Indian J. Crop Sci 1(1-2): 109-112.
  6. Mehmood S, Bashir M, Ahmad A, Akram Z, Jabeen N, Gulfraz M (2008) Molecular characterization of regional Sorghum bicolar varieties from Pakistan. Pak J. Bot 40(5): 2015-2021.
  7. Rohlf FJ (1990) NT Sys-pc, Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Ver., 2.02. Exeter Publ. Ltd., New York, pp 34-42.
  8. Saghai-Maroof, MA, Soliman KM, Jorgensen RA, Allard RW (1984) Ribosomal spacer length polymorphism in Barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location and population dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 81: 8014-8019.
  9. Simon CJ, Muehlbauer FJ (1997) Construction of chickpea linkage map and its comparison with the maps of pea and lentil. J Herid 88: 115-119.
  10. Singh BD (2004) Genetic markers. Fundamentals of Genet 3: 426-427.
  11. Wolfe AD, Liston A (1998) Contributions of PCR based methods to plant systematics and evolutionary biology. In: Plant Molecular Systematics II, pp 43-86.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)