Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 32 issue 2 (june 2012) : 105 - 110

MEASUREMENT OF TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF SOYBEAN GROWERS- A DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS APPROACH

B.G. Nair, G.B. Malthane, R.N. Wankhade
1Deptt. of Agric. Eco. & Statistics, College of Agriculture, Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola-444 104, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Nair B.G., Malthane G.B., Wankhade R.N. (2024). MEASUREMENT OF TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF SOYBEAN GROWERS- A DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS APPROACH. Agricultural Science Digest. 32(2): 105 - 110. doi: .
The present study was undertaken to assess the technical efficiency at farm level in respect of soybean crop by selecting farmers growing soybean in Amravati district. They were grouped in three groups. Group I for small farmers, Group II for medium farmers and Group III for large farmers. The primary data was collected by survey method and the analysis was done by using Data Envelopment Analysis computer programme. The analysis revealed that the mean technical efficiency under constant returns to scale for small farmers, medium farmers and large farmers was found to be 0, 97.4 and 61.8 per cent, respectively. The mean technical efficiency under variable return to scale for small farmers, medium farmers and large farmers was found to be 0, 94.3 and73.6 per cent, respectively.
  1. Farell, M.J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. J. Royal Statistical Society. 120:11-37.
  2. Kalirajan, K.P. and Shand, R.T. (1994). Modeling and measuring economic efficiency under risk. Indian J. Agric. Econ. 49(4):579-590.

Editorial Board

View all (0)