Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Agricultural Science Digest
Print ISSN: 0253-150X
Online ISSN: 0976-0547
NASS Rating
5.52
SJR
0.176
CiteScore
0.357

Chief Editor:
Arvind kumar
Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural Uni., Jhansi, U.P., INDIA
Frequency:Bi-monthly
Indexing:
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossR...

Agricultural Science Digest, volume 20 issue 4 (december 2000) : 238-240

BIOCHEMICAL ASPECTS OF HOST PLANT RESISTANCE TO YELLOW MITE IN CHILLI

Khalid Ahmed, P.Purnachandra Rao, A.Lalita Kumari
1Regional Agricultural Research Station Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultllf61 University, Lam, Guntur- 522 034, India.

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Ahmed Khalid, Rao P.Purnachandra, Kumari A.Lalita (2025). BIOCHEMICAL ASPECTS OF HOST PLANT RESISTANCE TO YELLOW MITE IN CHILLI. Agricultural Science Digest. 20(4): 238-240. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Different biochemical constituents like phenols,sug~,tannins, chlorophyll, proteins
and nutrient composition of N,P,K, Ca and Mg in leaf were estimated in fifteen chilli cultures,
representing resistant, susceptible and highly susceptible groups to mite infestation. The
different biochemical constituents and nutrients in leaf were correlated with mite incidence.
Among the biochemical parameters studied tannins, phenols, potassium, calcium, magnesium
and chlorophyll were found to have negative correlation with mite incidence. Total
sugars, protein content and nitrogen content exhibited positive association with mite
incidence. Phosphorous content in leaf did not exhibit any relationship with mite incidence.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Borah, D.C. (1987) Ph.D Thesis, U AS, Dharwad, pp 165-202.
    2. parbrowskii, Z.T. and Bielak, B. (1979) Dept. Appl. Zool, Warsaw Agricultural University Warsaw, Poland.
    3. pp 317-326.
    4. Dubois et al. (1956) Analytical. Chern. 26 : 350.
    5. Goldstein, J.L. and Swain, T. (1965) Phytochemistry. 4:185-192.
    6. Henneberry, T.J. (1962). J. Eco.Ent. 55: 134-137.
    7. Jackson, M.N. (1967). Soil and chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi. pp 115-27.
    8. Khalid Ahmed (1988). Annual report, AICVIP, RARS, Lam pp : 23-24.
    9. Lane, H.C. and Schuster, M.F. (1981). Phytochemistry. 20: 425-427.
    10. Mallick, C.P. and Singh, M.B. (1980). Plant enzymology and histoenzymology. Kalyani Publishers, NeiN Delhi.
    11. pp 286. .
    12. Poe, S.L. (1973). Florida Ent. 54 : 183-186.
    13. Rao, B.HK et al. (1983). Special Issue Indian J. Ent. 1 : 2-15.
    14. Rodriguez, et al. (1960). J. Eco.Ent. 52 : 491-495.
    15. Sadana, G.L. and Meena Goyal. (1983). Indian J. Acaralogy. 8 : 49-56.
    16. Sadasivam,S and Manikam, A. (1992). Biochemical meth'X!s for agricultural sciences. Wiley Eastern Ltd., New Delhi. pp 187-195.
    17. Sances, e! al. (1982). Environ. Ent. 11 : 516-518.
    18. Summers, F.M and Stockings, C.R. (1972). Acaralogia. 14 : 170-178.
    19. Tulisalo, U. (1971). Ann.Ent. 37 : 155-163. .
    20. Wermilinger, et al. (1985). Ent.Exp.et applicata. 38 : 23-28.
    21. Witham, et al. (1971). Experiments in plant physiology, Van nostrand, New York, pp: 245.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)