volume 20 issue 4 (december 2000) : 238-240

BIOCHEMICAL ASPECTS OF HOST PLANT RESISTANCE TO YELLOW MITE IN CHILLI

K
Khalid Ahmed
P
P.Purnachandra Rao
A
A.Lalita Kumari
1Regional Agricultural Research Station Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultllf61 University, Lam, Guntur- 522 034, India.
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Ahmed Khalid, Rao P.Purnachandra, Kumari A.Lalita (2025). BIOCHEMICAL ASPECTS OF HOST PLANT RESISTANCE TO YELLOW MITE IN CHILLI. Agricultural Science Digest. 20(4): 238-240. doi: .
Different biochemical constituents like phenols,sug~,tannins, chlorophyll, proteins
and nutrient composition of N,P,K, Ca and Mg in leaf were estimated in fifteen chilli cultures,
representing resistant, susceptible and highly susceptible groups to mite infestation. The
different biochemical constituents and nutrients in leaf were correlated with mite incidence.
Among the biochemical parameters studied tannins, phenols, potassium, calcium, magnesium
and chlorophyll were found to have negative correlation with mite incidence. Total
sugars, protein content and nitrogen content exhibited positive association with mite
incidence. Phosphorous content in leaf did not exhibit any relationship with mite incidence.
    1. Borah, D.C. (1987) Ph.D Thesis, U AS, Dharwad, pp 165-202.
    2. parbrowskii, Z.T. and Bielak, B. (1979) Dept. Appl. Zool, Warsaw Agricultural University Warsaw, Poland.
    3. pp 317-326.
    4. Dubois et al. (1956) Analytical. Chern. 26 : 350.
    5. Goldstein, J.L. and Swain, T. (1965) Phytochemistry. 4:185-192.
    6. Henneberry, T.J. (1962). J. Eco.Ent. 55: 134-137.
    7. Jackson, M.N. (1967). Soil and chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi. pp 115-27.
    8. Khalid Ahmed (1988). Annual report, AICVIP, RARS, Lam pp : 23-24.
    9. Lane, H.C. and Schuster, M.F. (1981). Phytochemistry. 20: 425-427.
    10. Mallick, C.P. and Singh, M.B. (1980). Plant enzymology and histoenzymology. Kalyani Publishers, NeiN Delhi.
    11. pp 286. .
    12. Poe, S.L. (1973). Florida Ent. 54 : 183-186.
    13. Rao, B.HK et al. (1983). Special Issue Indian J. Ent. 1 : 2-15.
    14. Rodriguez, et al. (1960). J. Eco.Ent. 52 : 491-495.
    15. Sadana, G.L. and Meena Goyal. (1983). Indian J. Acaralogy. 8 : 49-56.
    16. Sadasivam,S and Manikam, A. (1992). Biochemical meth'X!s for agricultural sciences. Wiley Eastern Ltd., New Delhi. pp 187-195.
    17. Sances, e! al. (1982). Environ. Ent. 11 : 516-518.
    18. Summers, F.M and Stockings, C.R. (1972). Acaralogia. 14 : 170-178.
    19. Tulisalo, U. (1971). Ann.Ent. 37 : 155-163. .
    20. Wermilinger, et al. (1985). Ent.Exp.et applicata. 38 : 23-28.
    21. Witham, et al. (1971). Experiments in plant physiology, Van nostrand, New York, pp: 245.
    volume 20 issue 4 (december 2000) : 238-240

    BIOCHEMICAL ASPECTS OF HOST PLANT RESISTANCE TO YELLOW MITE IN CHILLI

    K
    Khalid Ahmed
    P
    P.Purnachandra Rao
    A
    A.Lalita Kumari
    1Regional Agricultural Research Station Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultllf61 University, Lam, Guntur- 522 034, India.
    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Ahmed Khalid, Rao P.Purnachandra, Kumari A.Lalita (2025). BIOCHEMICAL ASPECTS OF HOST PLANT RESISTANCE TO YELLOW MITE IN CHILLI. Agricultural Science Digest. 20(4): 238-240. doi: .
    Different biochemical constituents like phenols,sug~,tannins, chlorophyll, proteins
    and nutrient composition of N,P,K, Ca and Mg in leaf were estimated in fifteen chilli cultures,
    representing resistant, susceptible and highly susceptible groups to mite infestation. The
    different biochemical constituents and nutrients in leaf were correlated with mite incidence.
    Among the biochemical parameters studied tannins, phenols, potassium, calcium, magnesium
    and chlorophyll were found to have negative correlation with mite incidence. Total
    sugars, protein content and nitrogen content exhibited positive association with mite
    incidence. Phosphorous content in leaf did not exhibit any relationship with mite incidence.
      1. Borah, D.C. (1987) Ph.D Thesis, U AS, Dharwad, pp 165-202.
      2. parbrowskii, Z.T. and Bielak, B. (1979) Dept. Appl. Zool, Warsaw Agricultural University Warsaw, Poland.
      3. pp 317-326.
      4. Dubois et al. (1956) Analytical. Chern. 26 : 350.
      5. Goldstein, J.L. and Swain, T. (1965) Phytochemistry. 4:185-192.
      6. Henneberry, T.J. (1962). J. Eco.Ent. 55: 134-137.
      7. Jackson, M.N. (1967). Soil and chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi. pp 115-27.
      8. Khalid Ahmed (1988). Annual report, AICVIP, RARS, Lam pp : 23-24.
      9. Lane, H.C. and Schuster, M.F. (1981). Phytochemistry. 20: 425-427.
      10. Mallick, C.P. and Singh, M.B. (1980). Plant enzymology and histoenzymology. Kalyani Publishers, NeiN Delhi.
      11. pp 286. .
      12. Poe, S.L. (1973). Florida Ent. 54 : 183-186.
      13. Rao, B.HK et al. (1983). Special Issue Indian J. Ent. 1 : 2-15.
      14. Rodriguez, et al. (1960). J. Eco.Ent. 52 : 491-495.
      15. Sadana, G.L. and Meena Goyal. (1983). Indian J. Acaralogy. 8 : 49-56.
      16. Sadasivam,S and Manikam, A. (1992). Biochemical meth'X!s for agricultural sciences. Wiley Eastern Ltd., New Delhi. pp 187-195.
      17. Sances, e! al. (1982). Environ. Ent. 11 : 516-518.
      18. Summers, F.M and Stockings, C.R. (1972). Acaralogia. 14 : 170-178.
      19. Tulisalo, U. (1971). Ann.Ent. 37 : 155-163. .
      20. Wermilinger, et al. (1985). Ent.Exp.et applicata. 38 : 23-28.
      21. Witham, et al. (1971). Experiments in plant physiology, Van nostrand, New York, pp: 245.
      In this Article
      Published In
      Agricultural Science Digest

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)