Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Science Digest, volume 20 issue 4 (december 2000) : 231-233

FIELD EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT WHEAT VARIETIES AGAINST BROWN AND BLACK RUST

S.K. Shivankar, R.S. Shivankar
1Wheat Research Unit, Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Krishl Vidyapeeth, Akola-444 104, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Shivankar S.K., Shivankar R.S. (2024). FIELD EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT WHEAT VARIETIES AGAINST BROWN AND BLACK RUST. Agricultural Science Digest. 20(4): 231-233. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Rod row screening nursery comprising of 168 wheat strains with three checks for the reaction
to rusts was sown in the first week of December, for two rabi seasons of 1996-97 and 1997-98.
The nursery was artificially inoculated with rust spore suspension of brown and black rust inoculum. The year data indicated that out of 168 strains only 36 strains showed resistant reaction against brown rust (Puccinia recondita f. sp. trltic!J and only one strain viz. CPAN 4079 was found resistant to black rust (P. graminis f. sp. tritic!J. Sixty six wheat strains exhibited susceptible reaction against brown rust and 18 strains to black rust. Among 36 entries some varieties viz. AKW 1071 (Puma), HD 2189, HD 2380 were highly resistant and from 66 entries, the varieties viz. MACS 2496, AKW 381, HI 977, Vijay and N-59, highly susceptible to brown rust.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Arora, P.c. et a/. (1998). Indian J. Mycol. PI. PathoJ. 17 : 69-71.
    2. Gupta, R.P. and Singh. A. (1981). Indian Phytopath. 34: 300-303.
    3. Nayar. S.K. (1996). Data Book: 2-4.
    4. Pathak, K.O. and Joshi. L.M. (l971). Proc. 2nd Int. Symp. PI. Pathol. : 4.
    5. Sharma. A.K. et a/. (1998). OWR Progress Report, Crop Protection vol. V: 5.
    6. Tandon, G. et a/. (1991). Agric. Sci. Digest 11 : 87-90.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)