Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 20 issue 3 (september 2000) : 165-167

SORGHUM(SORGHUM BICOLOR L. MOENCH) FODDER YIELD INFLUENCED BY NITROGEN LEVELS AND SORGHUM CULTIVARS

R.C. Dhadheech, D. Kumar, H.K. Sumeriya
1Department of Agronomy Rajasthan College of Agriculture. Udaipur-313 DOl, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Dhadheech R.C., Kumar D., Sumeriya H.K. (2024). SORGHUM(SORGHUM BICOLOR L. MOENCH) FODDER YIELD INFLUENCED BY NITROGEN LEVELS AND SORGHUM CULTIVARS. Agricultural Science Digest. 20(3): 165-167. doi: .
Application of 80 kg/ha nitrogen significantly increased the plant height at 60 DAS
and at 80 DAS, leaves per plant, stem thickness, green and dry fodder yield g/plant, green
and dry fodder yield, gross realization, n~t realization and S:C ratio over their lower doses.
Significantly higher plant height at 60 and 80 DAS, leaves/plant at 60 and 80DAS, stem
thickness, yield of green and dry fodder g/plant and q/ha, net return and S:C ratio was
reported by variety SU-1 which was higher over Rajasthan chari-1 and Rahasthan chari-2.
Variety SU-1 recorded the highest green fodder (317.28 q/hal, dry fodder (110.39 q/ha)
yield and new realization (Rs. 9191/ha) which was 3.02 and 9.43,10.50 and 11.79 and
4.21 and 13.50 per cent higher over Rajasthan chari-1 and Rajasthan chari-2.
    1. Anonymous (1995-96) Annual report of all India Coordinated Sorghum Improvement Project, Shukadia Univ.,Udaipur.
    2. Gill, A.S. etal. (1988).lndianJ. AgricRes., 22 :171-175.
    3. Gupta, T.C.(1994). M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Raj. Agril. Univ., Udaipur.
    4. Khatik, R.L. et al.(1994). Crop Res., 17 : 302-306
    5. Mahakulkar, B.v. et al. (1992). Indian J. Agril. Sci., 62 : 247·248
    6. Patel, J.R. et al. (1990). Gujrat Agril. Univ. Res. 16 :11-16
    7. Sen, K.C. and Ray, S.N. (1971) Nutritive values of Indian cattle feeds and the feeding of animals. 6th Edn., ICAR, New Delhi
    8. Tisdale, S.L.; Nelson, W.L.; Beaton, J.D. and Havlin, J.L. (1993). Soil fertility and fertilizers. V'h Edn., Mcmillan Publishing Co., USA.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)