Chief Editor:

Arvind kumar

Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural Uni., Jhansi, U.P., INDIA

Frequency:Bi-monthly

Indexing:

BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossR...

INCIDENCE OF FARLY SHOOT BORER, CHILO INFUsCATELLUS IN DIFFERENT SUGARCANE GENOTYPES UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS

Maan Singh, YP. Madan, Dharam Singh, J.C. Mahla

Affiliations

¹ccs HAU Regional Research Station Uchani, ~rnal- 132001, India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Singh Maan, Madan YP., Singh Dharam, Mahla J.C. (2025). INCIDENCE OF FARLY SHOOT BORER, CHILO INFUsCATELLUS IN DIFFERENT SUGARCANE GENOTYPES UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS. Agricultural Science Digest. 22(4): 264 - 266. doi: .

ABSTRACT

A total of one hundred thirty one genotypes were tested against early shoot borer (Chilo inluscatellus Snellen) which consisted of 39,46 and 46 genotypes during 1995–96, 1996–97 and 1997–98 crop season, respectively. Based on the incidence, 30 genotypes were rated as tolerant, 48 as moderately tolerant, 52 as susceptible and 1 as highly susceptible having pest incidence 0.0 to 5.0, 5.1 to 10.0, 10.1 to 20.0 and above 20.0, respectively. The highest incidence of early shoot borer was recorded in genotypes S-90-337 (15.9%), CoS 90269 (18.7%) and CoH 98 (32.09%) during the years 1994–95, 1995–96 and 1996–97, respectively. The genotypes viz. CoH 108 and CoP 8421-1 maintained their status as susceptible and moderately tolerant for three and two consecutive years.

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Avasthy, P.N. and Tiwari (1986). In: Entomology in India. ICAR Coimbatore, PublicatIon pp 68-82.
Chaudhary, J.P. (1983). In: All India Workshop on Crop L9sses Due to Insect Pests held at Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University, Hyderabad, Jan. 7-9.
Jayanthi, R. (1988). Sugarcane (Spring Supplement): 12-18.
Kalyanaraman,V.M. et al. (1963). Indian J. Sug. Res. and Dev. 7: 89-95.
Khan, M.R. and Krishnamoorthy, Rao (1956). Proc. into Soc. Sug. Cane Teenol 9: 870-879.
Pandey, K.P. eta!. (1994). Indian Sugar, 4: 173~177.
Umapathy, G. et al (1990). Co-operative Sugar. 30:779-780.

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.