Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 22 issue 2 (june 2002) : 99 . 101

MANAGEMENT OF CUMIN BLIGHT BY DIFFERENT SPRAY SCHEDULES OF MANCOZEB

S.R.S. Dange, R.L. Patel, S.l. Patel, K.K. Patel
1Department 01 Plant Pillholog~. c.P. CoUege of Agriculture. Gujarat Agricultural University. Sardar Krushinagar - 385 506. India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Dange S.R.S., Patel R.L., Patel S.l., Patel K.K. (2024). MANAGEMENT OF CUMIN BLIGHT BY DIFFERENT SPRAY SCHEDULES OF MANCOZEB. Agricultural Science Digest. 22(2): 99 . 101. doi: .
In the present study, six different schedules of 0.25% mancozeb as to when it should be sprayed and on control (water spray) were compared. Results revealed that four sprays given at 35, 50, 65 and 80 days after sowing were found effective and economical followed by five sprays given at 30, 40, 50, 60 and 70 days after sowing.
    1. Baswana, KS. et al. (1995). Indian Cocoa, Arecanut and SpicesJ. 14: 155-157.
    2. Bhatnagar, K et al. (1998). Indian Phytopath., 51: 204-205.
    3. Chester, KS. (1950). Plant Dis. Deptt. Suppl.193:190-362..
    4. Dange, S.RS. (1995). J. Spices and Aeromatic Crops, 4:57-60.
    5. Dange. S.RS. et al. (1992). Agric. Rev., 13:219-224.
    6. Gemawat, P.O. and Prasad, N. (1969). : ldla:) Phytopath., 22: 49-52.
    7. Lakhtaria, RP. (1978). M.Sc. (AgrL) Thesis, Gujarat Agricultural University, Anand.
    8. Mehta, KG. and Solanki, VA (1990). Indian Cocoa, Arecanutand SpicesJ. 13:144-145.
    9. PatH. RK (1980). M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Gujarat Agricultural University, Anand.
    10. Sal:khla. B. et al. (1973). Indian Phytopath., 26: 154-155.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)