EVALUATION OF WEED MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR IRRIGATED SUNFLOWER (HELIANTHUS ANNU~

V. Balasubramanian; S. Anbumani*; T. Nadanassababady*

Agricultural Science Digest

Chief EditorArvind kumar
Print ISSN 0253-150X
Online ISSN 0976-0547
NAAS Rating 5.52
SJR 0.176, CiteScore (0.357)

Frequency :

Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)

Indexing Services :

BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Submit

Agricultural Science Digest, volume 22 issue 1 (march 2002) : 21 - 23

EVALUATION OF WEED MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR IRRIGATED SUNFLOWER (HELIANTHUS ANNU~

V. Balasubramanian, S. Anbumani*, T. Nadanassababady*

Affiliations

¹Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar - 608002, India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Balasubramanian V., Anbumani* S., Nadanassababady* T. (2025). EVALUATION OF WEED MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR IRRIGATED SUNFLOWER (HELIANTHUS ANNU~. Agricultural Science Digest. 22(1): 21 - 23. doi: .

ABSTRACT

An experiment was conducted during 1996 for two season to evolve weed management strategy. The experimental results showed pre-sowing application of f1uchloralin at the rate of 1.5 kg ha −1 integrated with one hand weeding at 30 days after sowing provided efficient weed control as well as higher weed control efficiency and it favoured towards yield attributes, which inturn influenced for higher seed yield than other treatments.

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

AgalWal, J.P. (1989). Farm Sci. J. 4: 142- 144.
Dharam Singh etal. (1992). Agric. Rev., 13:163-175.
Gogai, A.K. et al. (1991). Indian J. Agron., 36: 453-454.
Maragatham Sand S. Chellamuthu. (2000). J. Soils and Crops. 10: 195-197
Nimjee, P.M. (1992). Indian J. Agron., 37: 484-488.
Prasad, M.V.R. (1994). In: The Hindu-Survey oflndian Agric., p. 49-53.
Venkatakrishnan A.S. et al. (1994). VI Bienn. Conf. P.66.

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reviewed By

Share options

Editorial Board

View all ()

[
agalwal_1989] AgalWal, J.P. (1989). Farm Sci. J. 4: 142- 144.

[2] Dharam Singh etal. (1992). Agric. Rev., 13:163-175.

[3] Gogai, A.K. et al. (1991). Indian J. Agron., 36: 453-454.

[4] Maragatham Sand S. Chellamuthu. (2000). J. Soils and Crops. 10: 195-197

[5] Nimjee, P.M. (1992). Indian J. Agron., 37: 484-488.

[6] Prasad, M.V.R. (1994). In: The Hindu-Survey oflndian Agric., p. 49-53.

[7] Venkatakrishnan A.S. et al. (1994). VI Bienn. Conf. P.66.

EVALUATION OF WEED MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR IRRIGATED SUNFLOWER (HELIANTHUS ANNU~

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Reviewed By

In this Article

APC

Publish With US

Become a Reviewer/Member

Open Access

Products and Services

Support and Policies

Editorial Board