Chief EditorArvind kumar
Print ISSN 0253-150X
Online ISSN 0976-0547
NAAS Rating 5.52
SJR 0.156

Frequency :

Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)

Indexing Services :

BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Submit

Agricultural Science Digest, volume 24 issue 4 (december 2004) : 235 - 239

RELATIVE SUSCEPTIBILITY OF MUNGBEAN GENOTYPES TO PULSE BEETLE (CALLOSOBRUCHUS CHINENSIS UNN.)

S. Chakraborty, N. Chaudhuri, S.K. Senapati

Affiliations

¹Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari, Cooch Behar, West Bengal -736 165, India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Chakraborty S., Chaudhuri N., Senapati S.K. (2024). RELATIVE SUSCEPTIBILITY OF MUNGBEAN GENOTYPES TO PULSE BEETLE (CALLOSOBRUCHUS CHINENSIS UNN.). Agricultural Science Digest. 24(4): 235 - 239. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Relative susceptibility of 37 mungbean gnotypes to Callosobruchus chinensis were studied in the pre-monsoon and monsoon season. Among the 37 genotypes, the lowest egg laying (8.67 eggs), lowest number of adult emergence (0.00) and minimum weight loss (0.00%) were found on the genotype HUM-4-1 during monsoon season. During pre-monsoon season, minimum Weight loss(1.27%) was observed on the genotype A-39 coupled with lower adult emergence le.33) were recorded on Pusa-96-32 but maximum weight loss (23.86%) were found on genotype A-225 having higher adult emergence (23.67) during pre-monsoon season. Highest adult emergence (38.00) and weight loss (38.61) were observed on the genotypes 8ML-189 and A-112, respectively in monsoon season. Highest germination percentage even after damage of seeds was recorded from Bhutni-1 and A-39 (90%) whereas no germination was recorded from PUSA 96–32, PS-16, SML-175. From the overall observation it has been found that HUM-4-l, A-39 and Bhutni-1 were least susceptible whereas Pusa-96-32, SML-189, A-225 were highly susceptible 8l to pulse beetle (C. chinensis) attack.

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Charjan, S.K.v. and Tarar, J.L. (1994). In : proc. the Nat. Acad. Sci., India, Section-B. Bio.l Sci.. 64: 95-98.
Jagadeesh Babu, C.S. et al. (2000). Pestology., 24(6): 37-39.
Lambrides, c.J. and Imrie, B.C. (2000). Aust. J. Agric. Res., 51: 85-89.
Prabhakar, G.S. (1979). M.Sc. (Agric.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Bangalore: 1-137.
Sarkar, T.K. et al. (1991). J. Ent. Res., 15: 36-39.
Sison. M.L.J. et al. (1996). Philippine Entomologist., 10: 175-187.

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reviewed By

Share options

Editorial Board

View all (0)

RELATIVE SUSCEPTIBILITY OF MUNGBEAN GENOTYPES TO PULSE BEETLE (CALLOSOBRUCHUS CHINENSIS UNN.)

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Reviewed By

In this Article

APC

Publish With US

Become a Reviewer/Member

Open Access

Products and Services

Support and Policies

Editorial Board