Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 24 issue 1 (march 2004) : 51 - 53

EFFECT OF BORON AND MOLYBDENUM ON THEIR UPTAKE AND YIELDOF GROUNDNUT

G.M. Shankhe, P.5. Naphade, H.N. Ravankar, P.A. Sarap, 5.5. Hadole
1Department of Agricultural ChemistrY and Soil Science, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola - 444104, Ingia
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Shankhe G.M., Naphade P.5., Ravankar H.N., Sarap P.A., Hadole 5.5. (2024). EFFECT OF BORON AND MOLYBDENUM ON THEIR UPTAKE AND YIELDOF GROUNDNUT. Agricultural Science Digest. 24(1): 51 - 53. doi: .
In a field experiment on the effect of boron and molybdenum were studied on groundnut for Yield, their uptake by groundnut and their availability at critical growth stages. The results revealed that foliar applicatIon of boron + soil application of molybdenum along with recommended dose of fertilizers were found to be superior in increasing production level as well as availability of boron and molybdenum and their uptake by groundnut over recommended doses of fertilizers alone.
    1. HGltcher, J.T. Glnd Wilcox, LV. (1950). Ana/yt. Chern., 22: 567.
    2. JGlckson, M.L. (1967). Soil ChemicGlI AnGllysis. Prentice HCliI of IndiGl Ltd. New Delhi.
    3. Johnson, C.M. Glnd Arkley, T.H. (1954). Analyt. Chern., 26: 572.
    4. Joshi, P. eta/. (1987). Int. J Trap. Agric., 5: 3-4.
    5. SGlXenGl, H.K. Glnd Mehorptra, a.N. (1984)./ndianJAgric. Res., 18: 90-93.
    6. ShGlrmGl, C.M. iIDd Minhas, R.S. (1986). J Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 24: 314-316.
    7. Sinh!, .B. et a/. (1991), J Indian~. §?il Sci, 39: 118-122.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)