Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Science Digest, volume 24 issue 1 (march 2004) : 17 - 20

STUDIES ON THE RELATIONSHIP OF TOMATO LEAF CURL GEMINI VIRUS ON TOMATO WITH ITS VECTOR BEMISIA TABACIGENN*

R. Ganesha Naik, V. Muniyappa, John Colvin
1Delfurtment of Plant Pathology, University of Agricultural Sciences, G-KV-K, Bangalbre - 560 065 and Agricultural Research Station, Arsikere - 573 103, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Naik Ganesha R., Muniyappa V., Colvin John (2024). STUDIES ON THE RELATIONSHIP OF TOMATO LEAF CURL GEMINI VIRUS ON TOMATO WITH ITS VECTOR BEMISIA TABACIGENN*. Agricultural Science Digest. 24(1): 17 - 20. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Rate of transmission of ToLCV by B. fabaci from tomato to tomato was 80–100 per cent when single whitefly was used per seedling and survived 24 h after inoculation. Female adults were found to be more efficient (86.66–100%) in transmitting ToLCV than males (26.66–33.33%) when single whitefly per seedling was used. Five adult whiteflies were required for 100 per cent transmission of ToLCV from tomato to tomato, when acquisition and inoculation access periods were 24 h each. The minimum acquisition access and inoculation access periods were 0.10 and 0.20 hours, respectively. A latent period of 6 h was necessary for B. fabaci to became viruliferous.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Brown, J.K. and Bird, J. (1992). Plant Disease, 76: 220-225.
    2. Brown, J.K. and Nelson, M.R. (1988). Plant Disease, 72: 866-869.
    3. Butter, N.S. and Rataul, H.S. (1977). Phytoparasitica, 5: 170-186.
    4. Castellani, E. et al. (1981). AnnalideUa Facolta di ScienceAgrariedeUa. Universita deqli studi TL Torino, 12:145-161.
    5. Cohen, S. and Nitzany, EE (1966). Phytopathology, 56: 1127-1131.
    6. Mandai, B. and Muniyappa, V. (1991). Fitopatologia Brasileira, 16: 260-262:
    7. Mansour, A. and Al-Musa, A. (1992), PI. Pathol., 41: 122-125.
    8. Mathew, AV. and Muniyappa, V. (1991). Fitopatohgia Brasileira, 16: 46-49.
    9. Ramappa, H.K. (1993). Ph.D. Thesis, UAS, Bangalore, 196 pp.
    10. S,aikia, A.K. (1985). Ph.D. Thesis, UAS, Bangalore, 229 pp.
    11. Seetharama Reddy, K. and Yaraguntaiah, R.C. (1981). IndianPhytopath., 34: 310-313
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)