Chief EditorArvind kumar
Print ISSN 0253-150X
Online ISSN 0976-0547
NAAS Rating 5.52
SJR 0.156

Frequency :

Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)

Indexing Services :

BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Submit

Agricultural Science Digest, volume 25 issue 4 (december 2005) : 235 - 239

EFFECf OF INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT ON GROWTH AND PRODUCI1Vrrv OF WHEAT CROP

Bindia, B.D. Kalia, B.S. Mankotia

Affiliations

¹Department of Agronomy, CSKHPKV. Palampur - 176 062. India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Bindia, Kalia B.D., Mankotia B.S. (2024). EFFECf OF INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT ON GROWTH AND PRODUCI1Vrrv OF WHEAT CROP. Agricultural Science Digest. 25(4): 235 - 239. doi: .

ABSTRACT

A field experiment was conducted during rabi 2000–01. The treatments comprised of three nitrogen levels (50, 75 and 100 per cent of recommended dose of nitrogen), two biofertilizer levels (Azotobacter and no Azotobacter), two FYM levels (FYM @ 10t/ha and no FYM) and one absolute control. The results revealed that plant height, number of shoot/m2, dry matter accumulation and number of effective tillers/m2 increased with Azotobacter inoculation, FYM application @ 10t/ha and increasing level of nitrogen up to 100 per cent of recommended dose, while number of grains per spika and 1000-grain weight were not significantly effected by inoculation and FYM application. Harvest index recorded increase with FYM application and increasing level of nitrogen up to 75 per cent of recommended dose, being at par with 100 per cent of recommended dose whereas it decreased with Azotobacter inoculation. It has been found that Azotobacter, FVM and 100% nitrogen produced 36.79, 43.46 and 44.55% more yield over control, respectively.

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Anonymous (2001). Fertilizer Statistics. December 2001. The Fertilizer Association of India. New Delhi. pp.38-46.
Jackson. ML (1967). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall. Inc. Eaglearoad Cliff. N-3.
Kataria. N et al. (1999). Indian J. Agon.. 44: 115-118.
Kumar. B. and Sharma. RP. (2000). Indian J. Agric. Res.. 34: 34-38
Lakshminarayanan. K. et al. (1992). Indian J. Agric. Sci.. 62: 75-76.
Olsen. S.Z. et al. (1954). USDA Circular. 939: 19.
Piper. C.S. (1966). Soil and Plant Analysis. Hans Publishers. Bombay.
Rao. D.L.N. (1986). In: Soil Microorganism and Plant Growth. (Subba Rao. N.S. ed.) Oxford and IBH. New Delhi.
Sobey, B.R and Harl. V.E. (1975). J. Environ. Quality. 4: 252-256.
Subbiah. BV and Asija. GL (1956). Curro Sci.. 25: 259:266.
Sushila. Rand Giri, G. (2000). Indian J. Agon.. 45: 590-595.

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reviewed By

Share options

Editorial Board

View all (0)

EFFECf OF INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT ON GROWTH AND PRODUCI1Vrrv OF WHEAT CROP

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Reviewed By

In this Article

APC

Publish With US

Become a Reviewer/Member

Open Access

Products and Services

Support and Policies

Editorial Board