Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 25 issue 3 (september 2005) : 194 - 197

DEVELOPMENT AND PREDATORY POTENTIAL OF GREEN LACEWING CHRYSOPERLA CARNEA (STEPHENS) (NEUROPTERA : CHRYSOPHIDAE) ON DIFFERENT PREY INSECTS

N
N. Balakrishnan·
R
R.K. MuraU Baskaran
N
N.R. Mahadevan
1Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Madurai - 625104, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Balakrishnan· N., Baskaran MuraU R.K., Mahadevan N.R. (2025). DEVELOPMENT AND PREDATORY POTENTIAL OF GREEN LACEWING CHRYSOPERLA CARNEA (STEPHENS) (NEUROPTERA : CHRYSOPHIDAE) ON DIFFERENT PREY INSECTS. Agricultural Science Digest. 25(3): 194 - 197. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The total grub period and pupal period varied from 8.60 (Helicoverpa armigera eggs) to 11.40 (H. armigeraneonate larvae), and 7.50 (Amrasca devastans) to 8.40 (H. armigera neonate larvae), respectively. The total life cycle of C. carnea from egg to adult emergence varied from 16.60 (Aphis craccivora) to 19.80 (H. armigeraneonate larvae) days. The total number of preys consumed by Chrysoperla carnea grubs was more onCorcyra cephalonica eggs (700.90) and less on A. devastans (270.00). Among the insect hosts, C. carnea grubs showed more preference to the host eggs and the final instar grub consumed more number of preys compared to earlier instars.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Balasubramani, V. and Swamiappan. M. (1994). Anzeiger-fur-Schadlingsknde Pflanzenschultz Utvelschtz, 67(8): 165-167.
    2. EI-Dakroury, M.S.\. et al. (1979). Agric. Res. Rev., 55: 151-156.
    3. Gautam, RD. (1990). Training Course on Insect Mass Rearing Technologies held during 2S June - 7 July, 1990 at !ARI, New Delhi.
    4. Krishnamoorthy, A. and Mani, M. (1982). Entomon, 7: 385-388.
    5. Legaspi. J.C. et al. (1994). Biological Control, 4: 178-184.
    6. Mani. M. and Krishnamoorthy, A. (1989). Entomon, 14: }9:20
    7. Nagarkarti, S.andSatya Prakash"(1974). CIBC Tech. Bull. 7: 169-173.
    8. Navarajan Paul. A.v. (1973). M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore. India.
    9. Obrycki, J.J. etal. (1989). Environ. Ent., 18: 1126-1130.
    10. Saminathan, V.R. et a/. (1999). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 69: 502-S05.
    11. Sharma. P.K. and Verma (1991). J. Bioi Control, 5:81-84.
    Published In
    Agricultural Science Digest
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 25 issue 3 (september 2005) : 194 - 197

      DEVELOPMENT AND PREDATORY POTENTIAL OF GREEN LACEWING CHRYSOPERLA CARNEA (STEPHENS) (NEUROPTERA : CHRYSOPHIDAE) ON DIFFERENT PREY INSECTS

      N
      N. Balakrishnan·
      R
      R.K. MuraU Baskaran
      N
      N.R. Mahadevan
      1Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Madurai - 625104, India

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Balakrishnan· N., Baskaran MuraU R.K., Mahadevan N.R. (2025). DEVELOPMENT AND PREDATORY POTENTIAL OF GREEN LACEWING CHRYSOPERLA CARNEA (STEPHENS) (NEUROPTERA : CHRYSOPHIDAE) ON DIFFERENT PREY INSECTS. Agricultural Science Digest. 25(3): 194 - 197. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      The total grub period and pupal period varied from 8.60 (Helicoverpa armigera eggs) to 11.40 (H. armigeraneonate larvae), and 7.50 (Amrasca devastans) to 8.40 (H. armigera neonate larvae), respectively. The total life cycle of C. carnea from egg to adult emergence varied from 16.60 (Aphis craccivora) to 19.80 (H. armigeraneonate larvae) days. The total number of preys consumed by Chrysoperla carnea grubs was more onCorcyra cephalonica eggs (700.90) and less on A. devastans (270.00). Among the insect hosts, C. carnea grubs showed more preference to the host eggs and the final instar grub consumed more number of preys compared to earlier instars.

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Balasubramani, V. and Swamiappan. M. (1994). Anzeiger-fur-Schadlingsknde Pflanzenschultz Utvelschtz, 67(8): 165-167.
        2. EI-Dakroury, M.S.\. et al. (1979). Agric. Res. Rev., 55: 151-156.
        3. Gautam, RD. (1990). Training Course on Insect Mass Rearing Technologies held during 2S June - 7 July, 1990 at !ARI, New Delhi.
        4. Krishnamoorthy, A. and Mani, M. (1982). Entomon, 7: 385-388.
        5. Legaspi. J.C. et al. (1994). Biological Control, 4: 178-184.
        6. Mani. M. and Krishnamoorthy, A. (1989). Entomon, 14: }9:20
        7. Nagarkarti, S.andSatya Prakash"(1974). CIBC Tech. Bull. 7: 169-173.
        8. Navarajan Paul. A.v. (1973). M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore. India.
        9. Obrycki, J.J. etal. (1989). Environ. Ent., 18: 1126-1130.
        10. Saminathan, V.R. et a/. (1999). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 69: 502-S05.
        11. Sharma. P.K. and Verma (1991). J. Bioi Control, 5:81-84.
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Agricultural Science Digest

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)