Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Science Digest, volume 26 issue 2 (june 2006) : 123 - 125

BIOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS IN ALLIUM CEPA L. VARIETIES INFLUNCED BY MALEIC HYDRAZIDE

A.B. Sabale, A.A. Mane
1Department of Botany, Shivaji University, Kolhapur - 416 004, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Sabale A.B., Mane A.A. (2024). BIOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS IN ALLIUM CEPA L. VARIETIES INFLUNCED BY MALEIC HYDRAZIDE. Agricultural Science Digest. 26(2): 123 - 125. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Influence of seed treatment of 100 ppm maleic hydrazide (MH) at different exposure periods was evaluated in two Allium cepa L. varieties viz., N-53 and N-2-4-1. Estimation of pigment content, polyphenols, total sugars, proteins, ascorbic acid, RNA etc. revealed a beneficial effect of the maleic hydrazide on the two onion varieties. The exposure period of 6 hours exerted a promising effect in both the varieties

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Arnon, D.I. (1949). Plant Physiol., 24: 1-15.
    2. Boreiko, V.K. et al. (1973). Fiziol. Biokhim. Kul’t Rast., 5(2): 191-193.
    3. Chakraverty, R.K. and Sircar, S.M. (1971). Bull. Bot. Soc., 25(1/2): 23-30.
    4. Derridj et al. (1986). Entomol. Expt. Appl., 41(3): 305-310.
    5. Folin, O. and Denis, W. (1915). J. Biol. Chem., 22: 305-310.
    6. Folin, O. and Denis, W. (1915). J. Biol. Chem., 22: 305-308.
    7. Gornall, A.G. et al. (1949). J. Biol. Chem., 177: 751.
    8. Gowda, V.N. et al. (1990). Indian Perfume., 34(4): 238-242.
    9. Jana, B.K. and Kabir, J. (1987). Prog. Hortic., 19: 125-127.
    10. Kalaiselvi, M.N. et al. (1992). Aquacult. Trop., 7: 91-94.
    11. Kalinin, F.L. et al. (1984). Fiziol. Biokhim. Kul’t. Rast., 16: 135-139.
    12. Kirk, J.O.T. and Allen, R.L. (1985). Arch. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 21: 523-530.
    13. Nelson, N. (1994). J. Biol. Chem., 153: 375-380.
    14. Raghava, R.P. and Raghava, N. (1993). Geobios., 20(1): 21-26.
    15. Sadasivam, S. and Manickam, A. (1992). Wiley Eastern Ltd. New Delhi, pp. 178-179.
    16. Sabale, A.B. and Mane, A.A. (2003). J. Ecobiol., 15: 463-467.
    17. Schneider, W.C. (1957). Methods of Enzymology. Vol. Iii, Academic Press, New York.
    18. Seltmann, H. and Nichols, B.C. (1984). Agron. J., 76(3): 375-378.
    19. Sharma, R. et al. (1982). Indian J. Bot., 5: 102-106.
    20. Singh, C. (1989). Acta. Bot. Indica, 17: 68-75.
    21. Singh, C. and Murthy, Y.S. (1987). Acta. Bot. Indica, 15: 206-212.
    22. Singh, K. et al. (1991). Indian J. Plant Physiol., 34: 137-142.
    23. Sobolev, A.M. and Dubko, L.A. (1985). Fiziol. Rast. (Mosc), 32: 196-198.
    24. Thakur, C. (1989). Acta. Bot. Indica, 17: 187-191.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)