Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Science Digest, volume 26 issue 1 (march 2006) : 11 - 14

BULB YIELD AND QUALITY OF ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.) AS AFFECTED BY APPLICATION RATES OF NITROGEN AND POTASSIUM FERTILIZER

Susheel Kumar, Sushant*, C.P. Tiwari**, Vinay Singh
1Department of Agriculture Chemistry and Soil Science, R. B. S. College, Bichpuri, Agra - 282 004, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Kumar Susheel, Sushant*, Tiwari** C.P., Singh Vinay (2024). BULB YIELD AND QUALITY OF ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.) AS AFFECTED BY APPLICATION RATES OF NITROGEN AND POTASSIUM FERTILIZER. Agricultural Science Digest. 26(1): 11 - 14. doi: .

ABSTRACT

A field experiment was conducted during winter of 2000–2001 to find out the effect of application of N and K levels on onion bulb yield, quality of crop and the uptake of nutrients by the crop. Treatment consisted four nitrogen and potassium levels 0, 50, 100 and 150 kg ha−1. The bulb yield was significantly higher at 150 kg N ha−1 it increased to the tune of 27.40 per cent, respectively over control, however, it significantly increased with the application of potassium at 100 kg K2O with the 14.85 per cent over control. Similarly dry matter yield, protein per cent and N, P, K, S contents as well as uptake of N, P, K and S were increased significantly over control with the application of 150 kg N ha−1 but in the case of 150 kg ha−1K2O application results were found to be non significant.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Beibl, R. (1958). International Potash Institute Berne/Switzerland, pp. 169-222.
    2. Chaurasia, S.N.S and Singh, K.P. (1993). Haryana J. Hort. Sci., 22(4): 307-310.
    3. Das, B.C. and Dhyani, K.C. (1956). Phyton., 6: 47-56.
    4. Gowda, P.H.R. et al. (1990). J. Potassium Res., 6(2): 79-81.
    5. Nakashgir, G.H. et al. (1996). J. Potassium Res., 12: 326-329.
    6. Pandey, V.B. et al. (1991). Recent Advance Conference held on 28-31 January 1989 at New Delhi, India, 231-234.
    7. Pramanik, K.K. et al. (1999). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 69: 126-128.
    8. Rana, D.S. and Sharma, R.P. (1994). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 64: 223-226.
    9. Roy, K. and Srivaslava, V.C. (1996). J. Potassium Res., 12: 367-381.
    10. Vol. 26, No. 1, 2006 13
    11. Ruiz, S.R. (1985). Agriculture Techica., 45(2): 153-158, Hort. Abst., 55: 9462.
    12. Sarvanan, A. and Nambisan, K.M.P. (1994). Madras Agric. J., 81: 434-436.
    13. Sharma, R.C. et al. (1976). Indian J. Agron., 21: 341-348.
    14. Sinha, S.K. (1978). In: Potassium in Soils and Crops (Sekhon, G.S. ed.) Potash Research Institute of India, Gurgaon, Haryana, India pp. 223-240.
    15. Skglay, E.O. (1976). Mahatma Agricultural Experimental Station, Research Report 88.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)