Chief EditorArvind kumar
Print ISSN 0253-150X
Online ISSN 0976-0547
NAAS Rating 5.52
SJR 0.156

Frequency :

Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)

Indexing Services :

BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Submit

Agricultural Science Digest, volume 28 issue 3 (september 2008) : 216 - 218

RESPONSE OF AMARANTHUS VARIETIES TO DIFFERENT TIME OF PLANTING

D.M. Panchbhai, V.L. Argade, V.N. Dod, P.D. Peshattiwar

Affiliations

¹College of Horticulture, Dr. Panjab Rao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapath, Akola-444 104, India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Panchbhai D.M., Argade V.L., Dod V.N., Peshattiwar P.D. (2024). RESPONSE OF AMARANTHUS VARIETIES TO DIFFERENT TIME OF PLANTING. Agricultural Science Digest. 28(3): 216 - 218. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The experiment was carried out during summer season of 2005-06. The treatments comprised of four planting time i.e. 2nd January, 17th January, 2nd February and 17th February and four varieties viz., Local, Pusa Kirti, Pusa Kiran and Chhoti Chaulai. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with three replications. The results of the investigation indicated that, plant height and number of leaves and total yield per hectare were maximum in third date of planting time
(2nd February) and variety Pusa Kiran.

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Martin-de-Troiani et al. (2001): Revista Lientifica Agropecyaria. 5:17-22.
Pal, S. et al. (2003): South-Indian Hort. 51:249-253.
Sant La, et al. (2003): Haryana J. Hort. Sci. 32(3-4):272-275.
Satish, Siyag; et al. (2002): Annl. Agric. Biol. Res. 7(1):31-34.
Sealy, R.I. et al. (1990): Advances in New Crops Proceedings of the First National Symposium New, Crops
Research, Development, Economics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, 23-26 Oct, 1983: 396-398.
Singh, J.N. et al. (2000): Haryana J. Hort.Sci. 29(3-4):225-228.
Srinivasan Venkatareddy, et al. (2000): Seed Res. 28(2):131-135.
Whitehead, W.F. et al. (2002): Hort. Sci. 37(5):773-77.

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reviewed By

Share options

Editorial Board

View all (0)

RESPONSE OF AMARANTHUS VARIETIES TO DIFFERENT TIME OF PLANTING

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Reviewed By

In this Article

APC

Publish With US

Become a Reviewer/Member

Open Access

Products and Services

Support and Policies

Editorial Board