Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 28 issue 3 (september 2008) : 165 - 169

GENETIC VARIABILITY, HERITABILITY AND GENETIC ADVANCE FOR QUANTITATIVE TRAITS IN SORGHUM GERMPLASM

Y.N. Warkad, N.R. Potdukhe, A.M. Dethe*, P.A. Kahate, R.R. Kotgire
1Department of Agricultural Botany, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola-444 104, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Warkad Y.N., Potdukhe N.R., Dethe* A.M., Kahate P.A., Kotgire R.R. (2024). GENETIC VARIABILITY, HERITABILITY AND GENETIC ADVANCE FOR QUANTITATIVE TRAITS IN SORGHUM GERMPLASM. Agricultural Science Digest. 28(3): 165 - 169. doi: .
Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance were studied in sixty-four sorghum germplasm accessions collected from various districts of Vidarbha region. Significant genetic variability was observed among the genotypes studied. Highest PCV and GCV values were observed for dry fodder yield per plant followed by earhead breadth and length, grain yield per plant, stem girth and 1000 seed weight. In the present investigation, high heritability accompanied with high genetic advance over mean was observed for the characters- grain and dry fodder yield, stem girth, earhead length and breadth, suggesting the influence of additive genes and provides scope for selection. Also, high value of heritability alongwith low genetic advance over mean were observed for the characters days to maturity and number of leaves per plant indicating that variability is mainly due to the non-additive gene effects and hence heterosis breeding can be fruitfully exploited in improving such characters.
    1. Amirthadevarathinam, A. et al.(1990). Madras Agric. J. 77(9-12): 462-464.
    2. Burton, G.W. (1951). Agron. J. 43: 409-417.
    3. Can, N.K. et al. (1998). J. Faculty Aguic. Lexushu Univ. (Japan) 43(1-2): 25-30.
    4. Dadheech, A. et al. (1999). Crop Res. 18(3): 409-411.
    5. Geleta, N. et al. (2005). Crop Res. 30(3): 439-445.
    6. Johnson, H.W. et al. (1955) Agron. J. 47: 314-318.
    7. Kishore N. and Singh L.N. (2005). Crop Res. 29(2): 252-258.
    8. Kumar, R. and Singh K.D. (1986). Form. Sci. J. 1(1-2): 40-51.
    9. Lush, J.L. (1949). Biometrical Studies in Plant Breeding. Kalyani Publ., New Delhi.
    10. Narkhede, B.N. et al. (2000). J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ. 25(3): 300-302.
    11. Sankarapandian, R. et al.(1996). Madras Agric. J. 83(10): 625-628.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)