Chief Editor:

Arvind kumar

Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural Uni., Jhansi, U.P., INDIA

Frequency:Bi-monthly

Indexing:

BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossR...

FIELD EVALUATION OF FUNGICIDES AND BOTANICALS AGAINST POWDERY MILDEW OF MUNGBEAN

A.P. Suryawanshi, A.G. Wadje, D.B. Gawade, T.S. Kadam, A.K. Pawar

Affiliations

¹Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Latur-413 512, India.

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Suryawanshi A.P., Wadje A.G., Gawade D.B., Kadam T.S., Pawar A.K. (2025). FIELD EVALUATION OF FUNGICIDES AND BOTANICALS AGAINST POWDERY MILDEW OF MUNGBEAN. Agricultural Science Digest. 29(3): 209-211. doi: .

ABSTRACT

All the treatments significantly reduced powdery mildew intensity and increased the test
weight and seed yield of mungbean over unsprayed control. Karathane 48 EC (@ 0.1%) was
most effective, recording least mean powdery mildew intensity (15.14%) and highest grain yield
(1425 kg/ha) and test weight (58.00 g). The second and third best effective fungicides were
Contaf (@ 0.1%) and Calixin (@ 0.1%), which recorded mean disease intensity of 18.43 and
18.99 per cent, respectively and were at par. Botanical NSKE and plain water also recorded
comparatively minimum disease intensity of 33.47 and 32.51 per cent, respectively over unsprayed
control (54.65%). Cost benefit ratio showed that all the treatments were economical although
Sulfex was most economical with C : B ratio of 1:21.11 followed by botanical NSKE (1:12.76),
Contaf (1:7.83), plain water (1:7.61) and Calixin (1:7.28).

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Banyal, D.K. and Rana, S.K. (2003). J. Mycol. Pl. Pathol. 33(2):302-304.
Das, S.R. and Narain, A. (1990). Indian Phytopath. 43(1):100-101.
Gupta, S.K. and Sharma, H.R. (2004). Pl. Dis. Res. 19(2):190-191.
Kappor, A.S. and Thakur, B.R. (1997). Indian Phytopath. 50(1):115-118.
Kunti, J.P. et al. (2002). J. Mycol. Pl. Pathol. 32(1):103-105.
Mayee, C.D. and Datar, V.V. (1986). Bull. I. MAU, Parbhani PP:74.
McKineey (1923). J. agric. Res. 26:195-218.
Sharma, I.M. (1991). Indian Phytopath. 44:133-134.
Shetty, T.A.S. et. al. (1996). Curr. Res. 25(1):14-15.
Shrivastava, L.S. (1996). J. Hill. Res. 9(2):296-298.
Singh, A. et. al. (2002). J. Mycol. Pl. Pathol. 32(2):286.
Singh, A. and Sirohi, A. (2003). Pl. Dis. Res. 18(1):63-64.
Singh, V.P. and Prithiviraj,B. (1997). Physiol. and mol. Pl. Pathol. 51(3):181-194.
Sone, S.K. et. al. (1999). Indian Phytopath. 52(2):138-141.
Vijaya, M. (2004). J. Mycol. Pl. Pathol. 34(2):604-605.

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.